Stock Price Dynamics of China: What Do the Asset Markets Tell Us About the Chinese Utility Function?

2014 ◽  
Vol 50 (sup3) ◽  
pp. 77-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yum K. Kwan ◽  
Jinyue Dong
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Hanlei Hu ◽  
Zheng Yin ◽  
Weipeng Yuan

In financial markets with volatility uncertainty, we assume that their risks are caused by uncertain volatilities and their assets are effectively allocated in the risk-free asset and a risky stock, whose price process is supposed to follow a geometric G-Brownian motion rather than a classical Brownian motion. The concept of arbitrage is used to deal with this complex situation and we consider stock price dynamics with no-arbitrage opportunities. For general European contingent claims, we deduce the interval of no-arbitrage price and the clear results are derived in the Markovian case.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e82771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Liu ◽  
Jianrong Wei ◽  
Jiping Huang
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 128-136
Author(s):  
K. V. Gusev ◽  
Roman I. Dzerjinsky ◽  
P. A. Palamarchuk

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (21) ◽  
pp. 8989
Author(s):  
Ming-Chu Chiang ◽  
I-Chun Tsai

In this paper, we infer that when no excess monetary liquidity exists, people tend to invest available capital in assets associated with a high return or low risk. However, when excess monetary liquidity occurs, capital may successively boost asset markets, and the stock market wealth is thus likely to spill into housing markets, resulting in bubbles in these two markets and therefore in the unsustainable development of both the housing and stock markets. This paper uses relevant data from the United Kingdom from January 1991 to March 2020 to verify whether excess monetary liquidity is a crucial factor determining the relationship between the housing and stock markets. Continuous and structural changes are found to exist between housing price and stock price returns. This paper employs the time-varying coefficient method for estimation and determines that the influence of stock price returns on housing returns is dynamic, and an asymmetrical effect can occur according to whether excess monetary liquidity exists. An excessively loose monetary policy increases asset prices and can thus easily result in a mutual rise in asset markets. By contrast, when excess monetary liquidity does not exist, capital transfer among markets can prevent autocorrelation during excessive market investment and thereby aggravate market imbalance.


2003 ◽  
Vol 116 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 225-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail Chernov ◽  
A. Ronald Gallant ◽  
Eric Ghysels ◽  
George Tauchen

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 2221-2270 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVIDE PETTENUZZO ◽  
RICCARDO SABBATUCCI ◽  
ALLAN TIMMERMANN

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 520-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Chur Chao ◽  
Shih-Wen Hu ◽  
Meng-Yi Tai ◽  
Vey Wang

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. e51666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianrong Wei ◽  
Jiping Huang
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document