Clinicopathological Study Of Cervical Cancer In Acharya Harihar Regional Cancer Centre, Cuttack

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Rupali Rajaswini ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-169
Author(s):  
Dr. Sandeep Kumar ◽  
◽  
Dr Manisha Roy ◽  
Dr Nupur Nelson ◽  
Dr. Govardhan Govardhan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 359-366
Author(s):  
Justyna Danielska ◽  
Małgorzata Moszyńska-Zielińska ◽  
Leszek Gottwald ◽  
Miłosz Wilczyński ◽  
Jacek R. Wilczyński ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110160
Author(s):  
Bernadatte Zimbwa ◽  
Peter J Gilbar ◽  
Mark R Davis ◽  
Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan

Purpose To retrospectively determine the rate of death occurring within 14 and 30 days of systemic anticancer therapy (SACT), compare this against a previous audit and benchmark results against other cancer centres. Secondly, to determine if the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), not available at the time of the initial audit, impacted mortality rates. Method All adult solid tumour and haematology patients receiving SACT at an Australian Regional Cancer Centre (RCC) between January 2016 and July 2020 were included. Results Over a 55-month period, 1709 patients received SACT. Patients dying within 14 and 30 days of SACT were 3.3% and 7.0% respectively and is slightly higher than our previous study which was 1.89% and 5.6%. Mean time to death was 15.5 days. Males accounted for 63.9% of patients and the mean age was 66.8 years. 46.2% of the 119 patients dying in the 30 days post SACT started a new line of treatment during that time. Of 98 patients receiving ICI, 22.5% died within 30 days of commencement. Disease progression was the most common cause of death (79%). The most common place of death was the RCC (38.7%). Conclusion The rate of death observed in our re-audit compares favourably with our previous audit and is still at the lower end of that seen in published studies in Australia and internationally. Cases of patients dying within 30 days of SACT should be regularly reviewed to maintain awareness of this benchmark of quality assurance and provide a feedback process for clinicians.


2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 403-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
UD Bafna ◽  
UMA Devi ◽  
KA Naik ◽  
S Hazra ◽  
N Sushma ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Manley ◽  
Andrew Last ◽  
Kenneth Fu ◽  
Stuart Greenham ◽  
Andrew Kovendy ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Nicholls ◽  
Amber Winter ◽  
Ashley Harwood ◽  
Ashley Plank ◽  
Preeti Bagga ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document