scholarly journals Answer Set Programming in a Nutshell

10.29007/tmt3 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Eiter
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Common Sense ◽  
Transitive Closure ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Sat Solving ◽  
Common Sense Reasoning ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Basic Concepts ◽  
Answer Set

Answer Set Programming (ASP) has emerged in the recent years as a powerful paradigm for declarative problem solving, which has its roots in knowledge representation and non-monotonic logic programming. Similar to SAT solving, the basic idea is to encode solutions to a problem in the models of a non-monotonic logic program, which can be computed by reasoning engines off the shelf. ASP is particularly well-suited for modeling and solving problems which involve common sense reasoning or transitive closure, and has been fruitfully applied to a growing range of applications. Among the latter are also problems in testing and verfication, for which efficient core fragments of ASP that embrace Datalog haven been exploited. This talk gives a brief introduction to ASP, covering the basic concepts, some of its properties and features, and solvers. It further addresses some applications in the context of verification and recent developments in ASP, which bring evaluation closer to other formalisms and logics.

scholarly journals Grounding and Solving in Answer Set Programming

AI Magazine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 25-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Kaufmann ◽  
Nicola Leone ◽  
Simona Perri ◽  
Torsten Schaub
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Propositional Logic ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
Answer Set

Answer set programming is a declarative problem solving paradigm that rests upon a workflow involving modeling, grounding, and solving. While the former is described by Gebser and Schaub (2016), we focus here on key issues in grounding, or how to systematically replace object variables by ground terms in a effective way, and solving, or how to compute the answer sets of a propositional logic program obtained by grounding.

scholarly journals A Case for Query-driven Predicate Answer Set Programming

10.29007/ngm2 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gopal Gupta ◽  
Elmer Salazar ◽  
Kyle Marple ◽  
Zhuo Chen ◽  
Farhad Shakerin
Keyword(s):  
Logic Programming ◽  
Common Sense ◽  
Automated Reasoning ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Stable Model ◽  
Common Sense Reasoning ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Full Power ◽  
Programming Systems ◽  
Answer Set

Answer Set Programming (ASP) has emerged as a successful paradigm for developing intelligent applications. ASP is based on adding negation as failure to logic programming under the stable model semantics regime. ASP allows for sophisticated reasoning mechanisms that are employed by humans to be modeled elegantly. We argue that being able to model common sense reasoning as used by humans is critical for success of automated reasoning. We also argue that extending answer programming systems to general predicates is critical to realizing the full power of ASP. Goal-directed predicate ASP systems are needed to make the ASP technology practical for building large, scalable knowledge-based applications.

scholarly journals Towards automated integration of guess and check programs in answer set programming: a meta-interpreter and applications

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 23-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
THOMAS EITER ◽  
AXEL POLLERES
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Polynomial Hierarchy ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Complete Problems ◽  
Polynomial Size ◽  
Disjunctive Logic Programs ◽  
Np Complete ◽  
Answer Set

Answer set programming (ASP) with disjunction offers a powerful tool for declaratively representing and solving hard problems. Many NP-complete problems can be encoded in the answer set semantics of logic programs in a very concise and intuitive way, where the encoding reflects the typical “guess and check” nature of NP problems: The property is encoded in a way such that polynomial size certificates for it correspond to stable models of a program. However, the problem-solving capacity of full disjunctive logic programs (DLPs) is beyond NP, and captures a class of problems at the second level of the polynomial hierarchy. While these problems also have a clear “guess and check” structure, finding an encoding in a DLP reflecting this structure may sometimes be a non-obvious task, in particular if the “check” itself is a co-NP-complete problem; usually, such problems are solved by interleaving separate guess and check programs, where the check is expressed by inconsistency of the check program. In this paper, we present general transformations of head-cycle free (extended) disjunctive logic programs into stratified and positive (extended) disjunctive logic programs based on meta-interpretation techniques. The answer sets of the original and the transformed program are in simple correspondence, and, moreover, inconsistency of the original program is indicated by a designated answer set of the transformed program. Our transformations facilitate the integration of separate “guess” and “check” programs, which are often easy to obtain, automatically into a single disjunctive logic program. Our results complement recent results on meta-interpretation in ASP, and extend methods and techniques for a declarative “guess and check” problem solving paradigm through ASP.

A Roadmap on Updates

2009 ◽  
pp. 2261-2267
Author(s):  
Fernando Zacarías Flores ◽  
Dionicio Zacarías Flores ◽  
Rosalba Cuapa Canto ◽  
Luis Miguel Guzmán Muñoz
Keyword(s):  
Standard Model ◽  
Logic Programming ◽  
Structural Properties ◽  
Relational Databases ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Central Issue ◽  
The Standard Model ◽  
Answer Set

Updates, is a central issue in relational databases and knowledge databases. In the last years, it has been well studied in the non-monotonic reasoning paradigm. Several semantics for logic program updates have been proposed (Brewka, Dix, & Knonolige 1997), (De Schreye, Hermenegildo, & Pereira, 1999) (Katsumo & Mendelzon, 1991). However, recently a set of proposals has been characterized to propose mechanisms of updates based on logic and logic programming. All these mechanisms are built on semantics based on structural properties (Eiter, Fink, Sabattini & Thompits, 2000) (Leite, 2002) (Banti, Alferes & Brogi, 2003) (Zacarias, 2005). Furthermore, all these semantic ones coincide in considering the AGM proposal as the standard model in the update theory, for their wealth in properties. The AGM approach, introduced in (Alchourron, Gardenfors & Makinson, 1985) is the dominating paradigm in the area, but in the context of monotonic logic. All these proposals analyze and reinterpret the AGM postulates under the Answer Set Programming (ASP) such as (Eiter, Fink, Sabattini & Thompits, 2000). However, the majority of the adapted AGM and update postulates are violated by update programs, as shown in(De Schreye, Hermenegildo, & Pereira, 1999).

scholarly journals A decidable subclass of finitary programs

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (4-6) ◽  
pp. 481-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
SABRINA BASELICE ◽  
PIERO A. BONATTI
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Stable Model ◽  
Unique Combination ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Trade Off ◽  
Full Support ◽  
Odd Cycles ◽  
Answer Set

AbstractAnswer set programming—the most popular problem solving paradigm based on logic programs—has been recently extended to support uninterpreted function symbols (Syrjänen 2001, Bonatti 2004; Simkus and Eiter 2007; Gebseret al. 2007; Baseliceet al. 2009; Calimeriet al. 2008). All of these approaches have some limitation. In this paper we propose a class of programs called FP2 that enjoys a different trade-off between expressiveness and complexity. FP2 is inspired by the extension of finitary normal programs with local variables introduced in (Bonatti 2004, Section 5). FP2 programs enjoy the following unique combination of properties: (i) the ability of expressing predicates with infinite extensions; (ii) full support for predicates with arbitrary arity; (iii) decidability of FP2 membership checking; (iv) decidability of skeptical and credulous stable model reasoning for call-safe queries. Odd cycles are supported by composing FP2 programs with argument restricted programs.

scholarly journals ASP (): Answer Set Programming with Algebraic Constraints

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 895-910
Author(s):  
THOMAS EITER ◽  
RAFAEL KIESEL
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Qualitative Information ◽  
Algebraic Computation ◽  
Generic Framework ◽  
Algebraic Constraints ◽  
Effective Problem ◽  
Answer Set

AbstractWeighted Logic is a powerful tool for the specification of calculations over semirings that depend on qualitative information. Using a novel combination of Weighted Logic and Here-and-There (HT) Logic, in which this dependence is based on intuitionistic grounds, we introduce Answer Set Programming with Algebraic Constraints (ASP($\mathcal A \mathcal C$)), where rules may contain constraints that compare semiring values to weighted formula evaluations. Such constraints provide streamlined access to a manifold of constructs available in ASP, like aggregates, choice constraints, and arithmetic operators. They extend some of them and provide a generic framework for defining programs with algebraic computation, which can be fruitfully used e.g. for provenance semantics of datalog programs. While undecidable in general, expressive fragments of ASP($\mathcal A \mathcal C$) can be exploited for effective problem solving in a rich framework.

scholarly journals Knowledge Forgetting in Answer Set Programming

2014 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 31-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Wang ◽  
Y. Zhang ◽  
Y. Zhou ◽  
M. Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Logic Program ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Irrelevant Information ◽  
Semantic Knowledge ◽  
Decision Problems ◽  
Stable Model ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Substitution Principle ◽  
Answer Set

The ability of discarding or hiding irrelevant information has been recognized as an important feature for knowledge based systems, including answer set programming. The notion of strong equivalence in answer set programming plays an important role for different problems as it gives rise to a substitution principle and amounts to knowledge equivalence of logic programs. In this paper, we uniformly propose a semantic knowledge forgetting, called HT- and FLP-forgetting, for logic programs under stable model and FLP-stable model semantics, respectively. Our proposed knowledge forgetting discards exactly the knowledge of a logic program which is relevant to forgotten variables. Thus it preserves strong equivalence in the sense that strongly equivalent logic programs will remain strongly equivalent after forgetting the same variables. We show that this semantic forgetting result is always expressible; and we prove a representation theorem stating that the HT- and FLP-forgetting can be precisely characterized by Zhang-Zhou's four forgetting postulates under the HT- and FLP-model semantics, respectively. We also reveal underlying connections between the proposed forgetting and the forgetting of propositional logic, and provide complexity results for decision problems in relation to the forgetting. An application of the proposed forgetting is also considered in a conflict solving scenario.

scholarly journals Minish HAT: A Tool for the Minimization of Here-and-There Logic Programs and Theories in Answer Set Programming

Proceedings ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Martin ◽  
Pedro Cabalar
Keyword(s):  
Logic Program ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Boolean Logic ◽  
Minimal Representation ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Minimization Methods ◽  
Programming Techniques ◽  
Software Implementations ◽  
Reduced Time ◽  
Answer Set

When it comes to the writing of a new logic program or theory, it is of great importance to obtain a concise and minimal representation, for simplicity and ease of interpretation reasons. There are already a few methods and many tools, such as Karnaugh Maps or the Quine-McCluskey method, as well as their numerous software implementations, that solve this minimization problem in Boolean logic. This is not the case for Here-and-There logic, also called three-valued logic. Even though there are theoretical minimization methods for logic theories and programs, there aren’t any published tools that are able to obtain a minimal equivalent logic program. In this paper we present the first version of a tool called that is able to efficiently obtain minimal and equivalent representations for any logic program in Here-and-There. The described tool uses an hybrid method both leveraging a modified version of the Quine-McCluskey algorithm and Answer Set Programming techniques to minimize fairly complex logic programs in a reduced time.

scholarly journals Optimizing Answer Set Computation via Heuristic-Based Decomposition

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (04) ◽  
pp. 603-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
FRANCESCO CALIMERI ◽  
SIMONA PERRI ◽  
JESSICA ZANGARI
Keyword(s):  
Logic Programming ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Decomposition Techniques ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Experimental Activity ◽  
Performance Of Systems ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Answer Set

AbstractAnswer Set Programming (ASP) is a purely declarative formalism developed in the field of logic programming and non-monotonic reasoning: computational problems are encoded by logic programs whose answer sets, corresponding to solutions, are computed by an ASP system. Different, semantically equivalent, programs can be defined for the same problem; however, performance of systems evaluating them might significantly vary. We propose an approach for automatically transforming an input logic program into an equivalent one that can be evaluated more efficiently. One can make use of existing tree-decomposition techniques for rewriting selected rules into a set of multiple ones; the idea is to guide and adaptively apply them on the basis of proper new heuristics, to obtain a smart rewriting algorithm to be integrated into an ASP system. The method is rather general: it can be adapted to any system and implement different preference policies. Furthermore, we define a set of new heuristics tailored at optimizing grounding, one of the main phases of the ASP computation; we use them in order to implement the approach into the ASP systemDLV, in particular into its grounding subsystemℐ-DLV, and carry out an extensive experimental activity for assessing the impact of the proposal.

A Roadmap on Updates

2011 ◽  
pp. 1370-1375
Author(s):  
Fernando Zacarías Flores ◽  
Dionicio Zacarías Flores ◽  
Rosalba Cuapa Canto ◽  
Luis Miguel Guzmán Muñoz
Keyword(s):  
Standard Model ◽  
Logic Programming ◽  
Structural Properties ◽  
Relational Databases ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Central Issue ◽  
The Standard Model ◽  
Answer Set

Updates, is a central issue in relational databases and knowledge databases. In the last years, it has been well studied in the non-monotonic reasoning paradigm. Several semantics for logic program updates have been proposed (Brewka, Dix, & Knonolige 1997), (De Schreye, Hermenegildo, & Pereira, 1999) (Katsumo & Mendelzon, 1991). However, recently a set of proposals has been characterized to propose mechanisms of updates based on logic and logic programming. All these mechanisms are built on semantics based on structural properties (Eiter, Fink, Sabattini & Thompits, 2000) (Leite, 2002) (Banti, Alferes & Brogi, 2003) (Zacarias, 2005). Furthermore, all these semantic ones coincide in considering the AGM proposal as the standard model in the update theory, for their wealth in properties. The AGM approach, introduced in (Alchourron, Gardenfors & Makinson, 1985) is the dominating paradigm in the area, but in the context of monotonic logic. All these proposals analyze and reinterpret the AGM postulates under the Answer Set Programming (ASP) such as (Eiter, Fink, Sabattini & Thompits, 2000). However, the majority of the adapted AGM and update postulates are violated by update programs, as shown in (De Schreye, Hermenegildo, & Pereira, 1999).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document