scholarly journals Endoscopic sinus surgery training courses: Benefit and problems – a multicenter evaluation

Author(s):  
Boon Han Kevin Ng ◽  
Ing Ping Tang ◽  
Prepageran Narayanan ◽  
Andreas Leunig

Introduction: Dissection courses are important for trainees and surgeons in mastering the skills required to perform endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) which is a common surgery in otorhinolaryngology. Aim: To evaluate the benefits of ESS training courses and ways to improve training. Material and methods: In a prospective study using a structured questionnaire, participants of ESS courses in the United Kingdom, Malaysia, India and Thailand were asked on their experiences in these courses and suggestions on improving them. Results and discussion: The majority of the participants have experiences in performing ESS prior to joining the course. Infundibulotomy was considered the easiest dissection step in ESS while frontal sinus surgery was considered the most challenging by the majority of the participants. The motivation for most of the participants in joining the course is to improve their skills with almost all stating that their expectations of the course have been fulfilled with improvement of their surgical techniques, anatomical skills and on patient’s safety. Almost all the participants were satisfied with the course and would recommend attending it. Conclusions: ESS dissection courses are an integral part in the learning process of trainees in becoming a competent surgeon and for surgeons to improve their techniques. Continuous improvement should be made to ensure that the participants will benefit from attending the course.

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jodi D. Zuckerman ◽  
Sarah K. Wise ◽  
G. Aaron Rogers ◽  
Brent A. Senior ◽  
Rodney J. Schlosser ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 246-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Braun ◽  
C.S. Betz ◽  
G.J. Ledderose ◽  
M. Havel ◽  
K. Stelter ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 837-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulaziz S. Alrasheed ◽  
Lily H.P. Nguyen ◽  
Luc Mongeau ◽  
W. Robert J. Funnell ◽  
Marc A. Tewfik

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1715-1718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baran Acar ◽  
Emre Gunbey ◽  
Mehmet Ali Babademez ◽  
Hayriye Karabulut ◽  
Hediye Pinar Gunbey ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-19
Author(s):  
Yasushi Yamauchi ◽  
Juli Yamashita ◽  
Osamu Morikawa ◽  
Ryoichi Hashimoto ◽  
Masaaki Mochimaru ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Krouse ◽  
Dewey A. Christmas

The present paper compares the use of the microdebrider as a form of powered instrumentation for endoscopic sinus surgery with traditional endoscopic surgical techniques. A group of 250 patients undergoing surgery with the microdebrider was compared with a group of 225 patients undergoing traditional procedures in order to evaluate their postoperative recovery, healing, and incidence of complications. The use of the microdebrider demonstrated faster healing with less crusting than standard techniques, as well as decreased bleeding, synechia formation, lateralization of the middle turbinate, and ostial reocclusion. The microdebrider offers excellent surgical results with fewer complications and faster healing than traditional techniques in functional endoscopic sinus surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document