Estimations of Porosity and Permeability Model on Carbonate Reservoir Using Cross-Plot Analysis and Acoustic Impedance Inversion in "Gandhi" Field Gumai Carbonate Formation, Sunda Basin

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandy Purwagandhi
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
George-Best Azuoko ◽  
Amobi Ekwe ◽  
Amulu Emmanuel ◽  
Ayatu Usman ◽  
Eluwa Ndidiamaka ◽  
...  

Abstract In the quest to recover by-passed hydrocarbons, extend the life of mature fields, increase hydrocarbon reserves and satiate the increasing global demand for energy, the need for robust reservoir characterization using acoustic impedance inversion continues to grow. In this study, petrophysical parameters were evaluated for two sand intervals RX2 and RX5. Detailed cross-plot analysis of robust petrophysical properties, (density, water Saturation, Lambda-rho and Mu-rho and Porosity) facilitated fluid and lithology discrimination. Well to seismic correlations and acoustic-Impedance model-based, 3-D seismic inversion was done using Hampson Russell software, while petrophysical attribute slices and event-time structure maps were extracted at two horizons - H1 and H2. Results show that RX2 is 100ft thick in Well A, ranging from 5860ft to 5960ft, and 141ft thick in Well B, ranging from 5794ft to 5935ft. Interval RX5, 71ft thick, ranges from 6447ft to 6518ft in Well A, and 88ft thick in Well B, ranging from 6447ft to 6535ft. These intervals had average densities of 2.20g/cc for RX2 and 2.23g/cc for RX5 in Well A. In well B, density values are 1.95g/cc in RX2 and 2.06g/cc for RX5. Average porosities of 25.5% and 27.5% in RX2 and RX5 respectively for Well A; 29% and 19% in RX2 and RX5 respectively for Well B were observed. Respectively, average water and hydrocarbon saturation values of 0.31Swand 0.69Shfor Well A; 0.51Swand 0.49Shfor Well B, was recorded in both intervals. From the results, the thicknesses of RX2 and RX5 conform to the standard thickness of hydrocarbon reservoirs in the study area. Furthermore, the discrimination of the reservoir contents into fluid and lithology by the cross plots, and the observations in the attribute slices indicate that the selected intervals RX2 and RX5 are viable conventional hydrocarbon reservoirs.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Tariq Kakarash ◽  
Qays M. Sadeq

Permeability and porosity are the most difficult parameters to estimate in the oil reservoir because they are varying significantly over the reservoir, especially in the carbonate formation. Porosity and permeability can only be sampled at the well location. However, porosity is easy to estimate directly from well log data, permeability is not. In addition, permeability measurements from core samples are very expensive. Carbonate reservoirs are very difficult to characterize because of their tendency to be tight and heterogeneous due to deposition and diagenetic processes. Therefore, many engineers and geologists try to establish methods to get the best characterization for the carbonate reservoir. In this study, available routine core data from three wells are used to develop permeability model based on hydraulic flow unit method (HFUM) (RQI/FZI) for cretaceous carbonate middle reservoirs of Bai Hassan oil field. The results show that the HFUM is work perfectly to characterize and predict permeability for uncored wells because R2 ≥ 0.9. It is indicating that permeability can be accurately predicted from porosity if rock type is known.


2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 179-191
Author(s):  
Diako Hariri Naghadeh ◽  
Christopher Keith Morley ◽  
Angus John Ferguson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document