Application of fractal method for quantifying fault geometry

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Sukmono
Author(s):  
Alexey Andreev ◽  
Leonid Nefediev ◽  
Yury Nefedyev ◽  
Natalya Demina ◽  
Sergey Demin
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 232 ◽  
pp. 111300
Author(s):  
Xiaogang Song ◽  
Nana Han ◽  
Xinjian Shan ◽  
Chisheng Wang ◽  
Yingfeng Zhang ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 301 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 78-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuo-En Ching ◽  
Kaj M. Johnson ◽  
Ruey-Juin Rau ◽  
Ray Y. Chuang ◽  
Long-Chen Kuo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 103824
Author(s):  
Bin Wang ◽  
Bobo Li ◽  
Jianhua Li ◽  
Zheng Gao ◽  
Jiang Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinji Yamashita ◽  
Yuji Yagi ◽  
Ryo Okuwaki ◽  
Kousuke Shimizu ◽  
Ryoichiro Agata ◽  
...  

AbstractWe developed a flexible finite-fault inversion method for teleseismic P waveforms to obtain a detailed rupture process of a complex multiple-fault earthquake. We estimate the distribution of potency-rate density tensors on an assumed model plane to clarify rupture evolution processes, including variations of fault geometry. We applied our method to the 23 January 2018 Gulf of Alaska earthquake by representing slip on a projected horizontal model plane at a depth of 33.6 km to fit the distribution of aftershocks occurring within one week of the mainshock. The obtained source model, which successfully explained the complex teleseismic P waveforms, shows that the 2018 earthquake ruptured a conjugate system of N-S and E-W faults. The spatiotemporal rupture evolution indicates irregular rupture behavior involving a multiple-shock sequence, which is likely associated with discontinuities in the fault geometry that originated from E-W sea-floor fracture zones and N-S plate-bending faults.


Author(s):  
Michel Bouchon ◽  
Hayrullah Karabulut ◽  
Mustafa Aktar ◽  
Serdar Özalaybey ◽  
Jean Schmittbuhl ◽  
...  

Summary In spite of growing evidence that many earthquakes are preceded by increased seismic activity, the nature of this activity is still poorly understood. Is it the result of a mostly random process related to the natural tendency of seismic events to cluster in time and space, in which case there is little hope to ever predict earthquakes? Or is it the sign that a physical process that will lead to the impending rupture has begun, in which case we should attempt to identify this process. With this aim we take a further look at the nucleation of two of the best recorded and documented strike-slip earthquakes to date, the 1999 Izmit and Düzce earthquakes which ruptured the North Anatolian Fault over ∼200 km. We show the existence of a remarkable mechanical logic linking together nucleation characteristics, stress loading, fault geometry and rupture speed. In both earthquakes the observations point to slow aseismic slip occurring near the ductile-to-brittle transition zone as the motor of their nucleation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document