scholarly journals Asymmetric Effects of Monetary Shocks on Business Cycles in Iran (Approach: DSGE Model)

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (29) ◽  
pp. 133-168
Author(s):  
Bahram Sahabi ◽  
Hossein Asgharpur ◽  
Saeed Qorbani ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1069-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott J. Dressler ◽  
Erasmus K. Kersting

Equilibrium indeterminacy due to economies of scale (ES) in financial intermediation is quantitatively examined in a monetary business-cycle environment. Financial intermediation provides deposits that serve as a substitute for currency to purchase consumption, and depositing decisions are susceptible to nonfundamental shocks to confidence. The analysis considers various assumptions on nominal rigidities and the timing of deposit decisions. The results suggest that indeterminacy arises for small ES, and the resulting confidence shocks qualitatively mimic monetary shocks. A calibration exercise concludes that U.S. economic volatility from this nonfundamental source has increased over time while volatility from fundamental sources has decreased.


2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edilean Kleber da Silva Bejarano Aragón ◽  
Marcelo Savino Portugal

In this paper, we check whether the effects of monetary policy actions on output in Brazil are asymmetric. Therefore, we estimate Markov-switching models that allow positive and negative shocks to affect the growth rate of output in an asymmetric fashion in expansion and recession states. In general, results show that: i) the real effects of negative monetary shocks are larger than those of positive shocks in an expansion; ii) in a recession, the real effects of positive and negative shocks are the same; iii) there is no evidence of asymmetry between the effects of countercyclical monetary policies; and iv) it is not possible to assert that the effects of a positive (or negative) shock are dependent upon the phase of the business cycle.


2013 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 532-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Guo ◽  
Jinyan Hu ◽  
Mingming Jiang

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 361-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biao Gu ◽  
Jianfeng Wang ◽  
Jingfei Wu
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 897-921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byoung‐Kyu Min ◽  
Jangkoo Kang ◽  
Changjun Lee ◽  
Tai‐Yong Roh

2001 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles T. Carlstrom ◽  
Timothy S. Fuerst

2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (18) ◽  
pp. 2199-2208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erdinc Telatar ◽  
Mubariz Hasanov

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 2050004
Author(s):  
Ashima Goyal ◽  
Abhishek Kumar

A New Keynesian Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) model with habit persistence used to examine the US slowdown is also used to analyze the contribution of basic demand and supply shocks to the Indian slowdown. Kalman filter-based maximum likelihood estimation is undertaken with Indian output, inflation and interest rate data. First, our model based output gap tracks the statistical Hodrick–Prescott filter-based output gap well. Second, comparison of estimated parameters, impulse responses and forecast error variance decomposition between India and the US brings out the differences in policy responses, the structure of the two economies and their inflationary processes. There is a higher impact of interest rate shocks on output and inflation, and lower impact of technology shocks on output but higher on inflation in comparison to US. The former indicates monetary policy over-reaction and the latter validates a supply curve that technology shocks shift and inadequate adjustment of actual to potential output. Habit persistence is higher, markup and interest rate shocks are more volatile in India. Markup shocks play a much larger role in determination of Indian inflation again pointing to the importance of supply side factors. Third, smoothed states obtained from the Kalman filter to create counterfactual paths of output and inflation (during 2009:Q4 to 2013:Q2) in the presence of a given shock, show monetary shocks imposed significant output cost. The output gap was negative post the 2011 slowdown and in 2016.


2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzu-Yu Lin

AbstractIn this paper, we first use a structural vector autoregression model to examine whether the US economy responds asymmetrically to expansionary and contractionary monetary policies. The empirical results show that monetary policy has significant asymmetric effects on output and investment. To provide an explanation of such asymmetries, we consider a nonlinear dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model in which collateral constraints are occasionally binding over the business cycle. The nonlinear DSGE model is able to match the empirical findings that macroeconomic aggregates react asymmetrically to positive and negative monetary policy shocks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document