scholarly journals Can Hounsfield Unit Density Accurately Predict Recurrent Cholestatoma in Previously Operated Ears?

Keyword(s):  
Urology ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garrick Motley ◽  
Neal Dalrymple ◽  
Christine Keesling ◽  
Joseph Fischer ◽  
William Harmon

Author(s):  
Andrew L. Thompson ◽  
Jayme C. Kosior ◽  
David J. Gladstone ◽  
Julia J. Hopyan ◽  
Sean P. Symons ◽  
...  

Purpose:The computed tomogram angiography (CTA) ‘spot sign’ describes foci of intralesional enhancement associated with hematoma expansion in primary intracerebral hemorrhage patients. A consistent radiological definition is required for two proposed recombinant Factor VIIa trials planning patient dichotomization according to ‘spot sign’ presence or absence. We propose radiological criteria for diagnosis of the CTA ‘spot sign’ and describe different morphological patterns.Material and Methods: A prospective cohort of 36 consecutive patients presenting with primary intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) were enrolled in a multicenter collaborative study, and have been included for the present analysis. Three reviewers analyzed the CTA studies in a blinded protocol. Analysis of specific ICH and ‘spot sign’ features was performed including prevalence, number, size, location, morphology and Hounsfield unit density.Results:Twelve of thirty-six patients (33%) demonstrated a total of 19 enhancing foci consistent with the CTA ‘spot sign’. Mean maximal axial ‘spot sign’ dimension was 3.7±2.2 mm and mean density was 216±57.7 HU. No significant differences in age or blood pressure (p=0.7), glucose (p=0.9), INR/PTT (p=0.3 and 0.4) or hematoma location (p=0.3) were demonstrated between patients with or without the ‘spot sign’. Consensus definition and classification criteria for the CTA ‘spot sign’ are proposed.Conclusion:The ‘spot sign’ is defined as spot-like and/or serpiginous foci of enhancement, within the margin of a parenchymal hematoma without connection to outside vessels. The ‘spot sign’ is greater than 1.5 mm in maximal dimension and has a Hounsfield unit density at least double that of background hematoma density.


2019 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 397-401
Author(s):  
Abdussamet Batur ◽  
Ulku Kerimoglu ◽  
Huseyin Ataseven

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 426-426
Author(s):  
Dianne E. Sacco ◽  
Patricio Gargollo ◽  
Gupta Rajiv ◽  
Ijad Madisch ◽  
Ronald Arellano ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay Shah ◽  
Justyn Huang

BACKGROUND Computed tomographic coronary angiogram (CTCA) is a non-invasive test with a negative predictive value of nearly 100% for the detection of coronary artery study. While diagnostic yield of a dedicated CTCA with bubble contrast is not yet evaluated OBJECTIVE To assess the diagnostic performance of injected bubble contrast and ability to measure difference in hounsfield units and use it as a "negative contrast" in computed tomographic METHODS This is a single center, single patient study. Baseline acquisition of a non-contrast CT scan was acquired to get hounsfield unit count in the aorta and pulmonary artery- (Calcium scan protocol) 1.4 mGy (19.5 mGy/cm). Secondly, Echo contrasts (Definity) - 5mls was injected and an echocardiogram confirmed filling in the aortic region. Finally, bubble contrast (1ml air, 8mls water and 1mls blood was drawn up and agitated through a 3 way tap) - was injected, a timing run was initiated to calculate for the bubbles to opacity the pulmonary artery. The same scan protocol was used– 1.4 mGy (19.5 mGy/cm). RESULTS Hounsfield units’ difference in the aorta and pulmonary artery from baseline compared to echo contrast and bubble contrast were not significant. CONCLUSIONS We believe this is the first ever recorded case to use bubbles as CT contrast. While results were not significant, secondary to small volume of bubbles injected. Further research needs to be implemented to assess clinical difference with amount of bubbles and volume required. CLINICALTRIAL Single centre study


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document