scholarly journals A study on false positive results of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) test: Frequency of samples considered false positives in relation to the HBsAg concentration

Kanzo ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (11) ◽  
pp. 641-646
Author(s):  
Kojiro Michitaka ◽  
Atsushi Hiraoka ◽  
Miho Tsuruta ◽  
Toshihiko Aibiki ◽  
Tomonari Okudaira ◽  
...  
1989 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 551-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
J J van den Oord ◽  
F Facchetti ◽  
C de Wolf-Peeters ◽  
V J Desmet

We report on the binding of biotin, and hence of biotinylated antibodies and lectins, to ground glass hepatocytes and liver cell membranes in chronic hepatitis B viral infection. This binding is of low affinity, and was proved to be directed at the hepatitis B surface antigen, presumably at its disulfide bonds. To avoid false-positive results, this affinity should be considered in the interpretation of immunohistochemical stainings of hepatitis B virus-infected liver tissue with biotinylated reagents.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S551-S551
Author(s):  
Joseph Klingen ◽  
Marcel Yibirin ◽  
Jessica P Hwang ◽  
Harrys A Torres

Abstract Background Accurate interpretation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) laboratory testing is paramount in avoiding inaccurate diagnosis and incorrect management that could lead to unnecessary and overtreatment. This is particularly relevant in patients with cancer where universal testing is recommended in order to avoid HBV reactivation. Hepatitis B surface antigen testing (HBsAg) positivity indicates chronic or acute HBV infection. The rates and outcomes of a false-positive HBsAg have not been established for patients with cancer. Methods Three hundred and ninety-seven patients with any type of cancer and positive HBsAg seen at MD Anderson Cancer Center from January 2016 – January 2021 were retrospectively reviewed in this study approved by the institutional review board. Cases of false-positive HBsAg were defined as those patients with a positive HBsAg but negative HBsAg quantitative, negative HBV core antibody (total Ig), and undetectable HBV DNA within 30 days of positive HBsAg testing. Serum samples from patients were tested for HBsAg using Vitros Enhanced Chemiluminescent Immunoassay (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ, USA). Data collection includes demographics, past medical history, underlying cancer and its stage, prior cancer treatment, risk factors for HBV, co-infections (hepatitis C, HIV), symptoms, liver function tests, anti-HBV treatment, and interruptions on cancer treatment. Results Out of 397 patients with a positive HBsAg, 33 were excluded as they did not meet the diagnostic criteria or have insufficient HBV data. Of them, 3 cases (0.8%) were identified as false positive HBsAg. All 3 patients were female, white, and had progressive malignancy (Table 1). No prior history of liver disease or liver function abnormalities were noted with these 3 patients. Initially, antiviral treatment was started on 1 patient which was discontinued shortly after confirmation of false-positive HBsAg. All 3 patients had additional workup and evaluation by an HBV specialist. In 2 patients, cancer treatment was canceled or delayed. Conclusion Although uncommon, cancer patients with false-positive HBsAg need further workup to avoid overtreatment and unnecessary interruptions in cancer care Disclosures Jessica P. Hwang, MD, MPH , Merck (Grant/Research Support)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document