scholarly journals Some Results on Modular Forms — Subgroups of the Modular Group Whose Ring of Modular Forms is a Polynomial Ring

Author(s):  
Eiichi Bannai ◽  
Masao Koike ◽  
Akihiro Munemasa ◽  
Jiro Sekiguchi
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (05) ◽  
pp. 1111-1152
Author(s):  
Cameron Franc ◽  
Geoffrey Mason

This paper studies modular forms of rank four and level one. There are two possibilities for the isomorphism type of the space of modular forms that can arise from an irreducible representation of the modular group of rank four, and we describe when each case occurs for general choices of exponents for the [Formula: see text]-matrix. In the remaining sections we describe how to write down the corresponding differential equations satisfied by minimal weight forms, and how to use these minimal weight forms to describe the entire graded module of holomorphic modular forms. Unfortunately, the differential equations that arise can only be solved recursively in general. We conclude the paper by studying the cases of tensor products of two-dimensional representations, symmetric cubes of two-dimensional representations, and inductions of two-dimensional representations of the subgroup of the modular group of index two. In these cases, the differential equations satisfied by minimal weight forms can be solved exactly.


2009 ◽  
Vol 05 (05) ◽  
pp. 845-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARVIN KNOPP ◽  
GEOFFREY MASON

We make a detailed study of the generalized modular forms of weight zero and their associated multiplier systems (characters) on an arbitrary subgroup Γ of finite index in the modular group. Among other things, we show that every generalized divisor on the compact Riemann surface associated to Γ is the divisor of a modular form (with unitary character) which is unique up to scalars. This extends a result of Petersson, and has applications to the Eichler cohomology.


2013 ◽  
Vol 09 (07) ◽  
pp. 1765-1788 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOSE GIMENEZ

We prove the Eichler cohomology theorem for vector-valued modular forms of large integer weights on the full modular group.


1985 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 39-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Good

The study of modular forms has been deeply influenced by famous conjectures and hypotheses concerningwhere T(n) denotes Ramanujan's function. The fundamental discriminant Δ is a cusp form of weight 12 with respect to the modular group. Its associated Dirichlet seriesdefines an entire function of s and satisfies the functional equationThe most penetrating statements that have been made on T(n) and LΔ(s)are:Of these four problems only A1 has been established so far. This was done by Deligne [1] using methods from algebraic geometry and number theory. While B1 trivially holds with ε > 1/2, it was established in [2] for every ε>1/3. Serre [12] proved A2 for a positive proportion of the integers and Hafner [5] showed that LΔ has a positive proportion of its non-trivial zeros on the line σ=6. The proofs of the last three results are largely analytic in nature.


1985 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 57-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl-Bernhard Gundlach

The classical generalizations (already investigated in the second half of last century) of the modular group SL(2, ℤ) are the groups ГK = SL(2, o)(o the principal order of a totally real number field K, [K:ℚ]=n), operating, originally, on a product of n upper half-planes or, for n=2, on the product 1×− of an upper and a lower half-plane by(where v(i), for v∈K, denotes the jth conjugate of v), and Гn = Sp(n, ℤ), operating on n={Z∣Z=X+iY∈ℂ(n,n),tZ=Z, Y>0} byNowadays ГK is called Hilbert's modular group of K and Гn Siegel's modular group of degree (or genus) n. For n=1 we have Гℚ=Г1= SL(2, ℤ). The functions corresponding to modular forms and modular functions for SL(2, ℤ) and its subgroups are holomorphic (or meromorphic) functions with an invariance property of the formJ(L, t) for fixed L (or J(M, Z) for fixed M) denoting a holomorphic function without zeros on ) (or on n). A function J;, defined on ℤK×or ℤn×n to be able to appear in (1.3) with f≢0, has to satisfy certain functional equations (see below, (2.3)–(2.5) for ГK, (5.7)–(5.9) for Гn) and is called an automorphic factor (AF) then. In close analogy to the case n=1, mainly AFs of the following kind have been used:with a complex number r, the weight of J, and complex numbers v(L), v(M). AFs of this kind are called classical automorphic factors (CAP) in the sequel. If r∉ℤ, the values of the function v on ГK (or Гn) depend on the branch of (…)r. For a fixed choice of the branch (for each L∈ГK or M∈Гn) the functional equations for J, by (1.4), (1.5), correspond to functional equations for v. A function v satisfying those equations is called a multiplier system (MS) of weight r for ГK (or Гn).


1995 ◽  
Vol 138 ◽  
pp. 179-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernhard Runge

In this paper we compute dimension formulas for rings of Siegel modular forms of genus g = 3. Let denote the main congruence subgroup of level two, the Hecke subgroup of level two and the full modular group. We give the dimension formulas for genus g = 3 for the above mentioned groups and determine the graded ring of modular forms with respect to .


1977 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 371-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.R. Aggarwal ◽  
M.K. Agrawal

Let p be a rational prime and Qp be the field of p–adic numbers. Jean-Pierre Serre [Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 350, 191–268 (1973)] had defined p–adic modular forms as the limits of sequences of modular forms over the modular group SL2(Z). He proved that with each non-zero p–adic modular form there is associated a unique element called its weight k. The p–adic modular forms having the same weight form a Qp–vector space.The object of this paper is to obtain a basis of p–adic modular forms and thus to know precisely all p–adic modular forms of a given weight k. The dimension of such modular forms as a Qp–vector space is countably infinite.


1978 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl-Bernhard Gundlach

It is well known that the number Ak(m) of representations of a positive integer m as the sum of k squares of integers can be expressed in the formwhere Pk(m) is a divisor function, and Rk(m) is a remainder term of smaller order. (1) is a consequence of the fact thatis a modular form for a certain congruence subgroup of the modular group, andwithwhere Ek(z) is an Eisenstein series and is a cusp form (as was first pointed out by Mordell [9]). The result (1) remains true if m is taken to be a totally positive integer from a totally real number field K and Ak(m) is the number of representations of m as the sum of k squares of integers from K (at least for 2|k, k>2, and for those cases with 2+k which have been investigated). then are replaced by modular forms for a subgroup of the Hilbert modular group with Fourier expansions of the form (10) (see section 2).


2011 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 671-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
ERNST-ULRICH GEKELER

Let Γ = GL (2, 𝔽q[T]) be the Drinfeld modular group, which acts on the rigid analytic upper half-plane Ω. We determine the zeroes of the coefficient modular forms aℓk on the standard fundamental domain [Formula: see text] for Γ on Ω, along with the dependence of |aℓk(z)| on [Formula: see text].


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document