scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Methylene Blue Dye and Methylene Blue with Radioactive Tracer in Breast Cancer Sentinel Node Mapping

2004 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-108
Author(s):  
Jun Horiguchi ◽  
Yukio Koibuchi ◽  
Takashi Yoshida ◽  
Kotaro Iijima ◽  
Daisuke Takata ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Bayu Brahma ◽  
Rizky I. Putri ◽  
Lenny Sari ◽  
Ramadhan Karsono ◽  
Denni J. Purwanto ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 184 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter D Blessing ◽  
Alan J Stolier ◽  
Stephen C Teng ◽  
John S Bolton ◽  
George M Fuhrman

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 4841-4853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huang Li ◽  
Zhang Jun ◽  
Ge Zhi-Cheng ◽  
Qu Xiang

Objective This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological factors of the false negative rate (FNR) and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) mapping with 1% methylene blue dye (MBD) alone, and to examine how to reduce the FNR in patients with breast cancer. Methods A total of 365 patients with invasive breast carcinoma who received axillary lymph node dissection after SLNB were retrospectively analyzed. SLNB was performed with 2 to 5 mL of 1% MBD. We studied the clinicopathological factors that could affect the FNR of SLNB. Results The identification rate of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) was 98.3% (359/365) and the FNR of SLNB was 10.4% (16/154). Multivariate analysis showed that the number of dissected SLNs and metastatic lymph nodes were independent predictive factors for the FNR of SLNB. The FNR in patients with 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 SLNs was 23.53%, 15.79%, 3.85%, and 1.79%, respectively. Conclusions SLNB mapping with MBD alone in patients with breast cancer can produce favorable identification rates. The FNR of SLNB decreases as the number of SLNs rises. Because of side effects of searching for additional SLNs and the FNR, removal of three or four SLNs may be appropriate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document