Ottoman Legal Practice and Non-Judicial Actors in Seventeenth-Century Istanbul

Author(s):  
Hadi Hosainy
1992 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muriel Nazzari

A seventeenth-century inhabitant of São Paulo once remarked that Indians were “the most profitable property in this land.” Legally, however, Indians were not property at all, for the crown explicitly prohibited their enslavement. During most of the seventeenth century, the settlers of São Paulo complied with the letter of the law and did not officially give their Indian servants any monetary value, and though they often sold them, the sales were known to be illegal and were not usually recorded in public documents, such as the documents used for this study, inventários, settlements of estates. By the end of the century, however, local judges were openly allowing the monetary appraisal of Indians and their subsequent sale was duly recorded in inventários and other court processes.


A collection of papers recently purchased by the Society ii brings to light some interesting information about the ancestors of Sir Joseph Banks, P.R.S. from 1778 to 1820. The family appears originally to have come from Yorkshire. In the first half of the seventeenth century Robert Banks was a man of substance in Giggleswick. He had two sons—Joseph and Hamond. The former, born in 1665, was articled in 1681 to Thomas Chappell, attorney, of Sheffield ; of the latter nothing is known. Joseph Banks I built up a flourishing legal practice, and in the sixteen/nineties (the exact date is not known) went to live at Scofton in Nottinghamshire. In 1701 he was appointed steward of the manors of the Lady Mary Howard of W orksop; and he is later found acting in a similar capacity for the Duchess of Newcastle. W ith a good deal of pride he records in 1703 how he ‘ had the Duchess of Norfolk and her retinue at my house/ He sat as a member of Parliament for Grimsby from 1714/5 to 1721/2, and for Totnes from 1721/2 to 1727. A bout 1708 Joseph Banks I began to consider the purchase of an estate in Lincolnshire, and he eventually decided to buy Revesby Abbey, an old Cistercian foundation which was then in a ruinous state. The masons were put to work, the old abbey thoroughly reconstructed, and in 1713 the Banks’ possessions were taken there 'by sea.'


1963 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jozef Cohen
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-253
Author(s):  
Wu Huiyi ◽  
Zheng Cheng

The Beitang Collection, heritage of a seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Jesuit library in Beijing now housed in the National Library of China, contains an incomplete copy of Pietro Andrea Mattioli’s commentary on an Italian edition of Pedanius Dioscorides's De materia medica (1568) bearing extensive annotations in Chinese. Two hundred odd plant and animal names in a northern Chinese patois were recorded alongside illustrations, creating a rare record of seventeenth-century Chinese folk knowledge and of Sino-Western interaction in the field of natural history. Based on close analysis of the annotations and other contemporary sources, we argue that the annotations were probably made in Beijing by one or more Chinese low-level literati and Jesuit missionaries during the first two decades of the seventeenth century. We also conclude that the annotations were most likely directed at a Chinese audience, to whom the Jesuits intended to illustrate European craftsmanship using Mattioli’s images. This document probably constitutes the earliest known evidence of Jesuits' attempts at transmitting the art of European natural history drawings to China.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document