scholarly journals Quality of medical care in Russia

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 383-387
Author(s):  
G. В. Nazarenko

The system of providing medical care belongs to the sphere of economic activity referred to as «range of services» in Russia.The main criterion in the provision of services is the receipt of the final intended effect, which fully satisfies the customer of this service. If the final intended effect is not achieved, then this service cannot be considered as completed.In medical care, there is no final guaranteed result. The purpose of providing medical care is the very process of its provision.The intended result of treatment cannot be guaranteed, but the provider of medical care is obliged to apply all their experience and knowledge to achieve the most useful effect for the patient.Russian legislation provides for the evaluation of the quality of medical care based on the final effect. This approach to solving the issue of medical care improvement quality does not allow the healthcare in Russia to adequately develop since the main emphasis is placed on the administrative command system of control and motivation of doctors to their work. The openness of the medical community to the society leads to an inadequate evaluation of the inevitable medical failures, complications and problems in the field of medical treatment. The absence of medical practice institution in Russia and the prevalence of hired labor of doctors deprive the medical community of one of the main criteria for the development of medicine — the discretion, provided personal responsibility before a patient. In fact, it is impossible to receive high quality medical care under circumstances where a physician is only a hired "addition" to the material and technical base of a medical institution.The solution to the above problems can be found on condition of separating healthcare in Russia into a special sphere of economic activity with its own legal determination, structure, management, legislation. It is necessary to isolate medical community from society as much as possible, to limit free access to special information for public inspection and non-expert accusations. We should rely on the development of medical practice in the country as it fullestly reflects doctor's competence independent on the will of the employer.

Author(s):  
K.P. Topalov ◽  
◽  
Ye.K. Skoromets ◽  

The article analyzes 249 expert opinions on the quality of medical care from the standpoint of the responsibility of medical workers for their professional activities. The principles of moral responsibility for medical workers are outlined.


2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (11) ◽  
pp. 2421-2426
Author(s):  
Olena S. Shcherbinska ◽  
Gennadiy O. Slabkiy ◽  
Viktoria Y. Bilak-Lukyanchuk

The aim is to determine the types of medical services that family doctors should provide to women during pregnancy and in the postpartum period and the competencies they should have to provide these services and the most acceptable ways to acquire them. Materials and methods: During the study, the method of expert assessment, statistical method and method of structural and logical analysis were used. 50 obstetricians and gynaecologists who provide women with outpatient care and 50 family doctors acted as independent experts in the study. Results: The types of medical services that family doctors should provide to women during pregnancy and in the postpartum period and the competencies that they should have to ensure the provision of these services were determined by experts. The most acceptable ways to acquire the necessary competencies, as well as the benefits and risks of providing these services at the primary level of health care were designated. Conclusions: The implementation of the proposed types of medical care by family doctors will increase the availability and quality of medical care for women during pregnancy and in the postpartum period.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 4-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. V. Kakturskiy ◽  
O. V. Zayratyants

Purpose of research: To study methodological, organizational and normative problems of comparison of final clinical and pathological-anatomical diagnoses in the Russian Federation on the basis of a review of domestic and foreign publications.Abstract: Clinical and anatomical comparisons remain the most important function of quality control of medical and diagnostic work. Cases of divergence of diagnoses should be the subject of professional discussion in the medical community with the adoption of appropriate administrative measures to address deficiencies in the provision of medical care. Currently, there is no adequate regulatory regulation of the issue of comparison of clinical and pathological-anatomical diagnoses. This gives rise to many problems, including the subjectivism of the pathologist in the interpretation of the actions of the clinician, the permanent threat of criminal liability of medical workers for misdiagnosis. Penalties for discrepancies in diagnoses imposed by the Сompulsory Health Insurance Fund lead to an artificial underestimation of the divergence of diagnoses in medical organizations and to incorrect statistical accounting. The underestimation of the role of comorbid diseases and the lack of clear norms of their use in the diagnosis create difficulties in the correct assessment of the disease tanatogenesis, limits the analysis of morbidity and mortality for multiple reasons and entails the loss of some of the available information. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 9-15
Author(s):  
Morozov S.P. ◽  
◽  
Vladzymyrskyy A.V. ◽  
Varyushin M.S. ◽  
Aronov A.V. ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 62-69
Author(s):  
S. S. BUDARIN ◽  

The article reveals methodological approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of the use of resources of medi-cal organizations in order to improve the availability and quality of medical care based on the application of the methodology of performance audit; a methodological approach to the use of individual elements of the efficiency audit methodology for evaluating the performance of medical organizations and the effectiveness of the use of available resources is proposed.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agustin Lara-Esqueda ◽  
Sergio A Zaizar-Fregoso ◽  
Violeta M Madrigal-Perez ◽  
Mario Ramirez-Flores ◽  
Daniel A Montes-Galindo ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Diabetes Mellitus is a worldwide health problem and the leading cause of premature death with increasing prevalence over time. Usually, along with it, Hypertension presents and acts as another risk factor that increases mortality risk. Both diseases impact the country's health while also producing an economic burden for society, causing billions of dollars to be invested in their management. OBJECTIVE The present study evaluated the quality of medical care for patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HBP), and both pathologies (DM+HBP) within a public health system in Mexico, according to the official Mexican standard for each pathology. METHODS 45,498 patients were included from 2012 to 2015. All information was taken from the electronic medical records database, exported as anonymized data for research purposes. Each patient record was compared against the standard to test the quality of medical care. RESULTS Glycemia with hypertension goals reached 29.6% in DM+HBP, 48.6% in DM, and 53.2% in HBP. The goals of serum lipids were reached by 3% in DM+HBP, 5% in DM, and 0.2% in HBP. Glycemia, hypertension, and LDL cholesterol reached 0.04%. 15% of patients had an undiagnosed disease of diabetes or hypertension. Clinical follow-up examinations reached 20% for foot examination and clinical eye examination in the whole population. Specialty referral reached 1% in angiology or cardiology in the whole population. CONCLUSIONS Goals for glycemic and hypertension reached 50% in the overall population, while serum lipids, clinical follow-up examinations, and referral to a specialist were deficient. Patients who had both diseases had more consultations, better control for hypertension and lipids, but inferior glycemic control. Overall, quality care for DM and/or HBP has not been met according to the standards. While patients with DM and HBP do not have a current standard to evaluate their own needs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document