scholarly journals Comparison between Theoretical and Experimental Behavior of Shallow Foundation in Cohesive Soil

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 1915-1922
Author(s):  
Baraa Al-Dawoodi ◽  
Mohaned Waheed ◽  
Falah Rahil
2020 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 103556
Author(s):  
Daniel R. Panique Lazcano ◽  
Rubén Galindo Aires ◽  
Hernán Patiño Nieto

Author(s):  
R Saravanan ◽  
P Murthi ◽  
K Poongodi ◽  
G Shyam Sundar ◽  
R Gobinath

2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
G L Sivakumar Babu ◽  
Amit Srivastava ◽  
D SN Murthy

In recent years, there have been considerable advances in the characterization of soil variability and its application in geotechnical designs. It is recognized that in using reliability-based design it is necessary to consider all sources of uncertainty in the analysis and incorporate them in the geotechnical design. It is also necessary to examine the reliability-based approach in relation to deterministic approaches. In this study, cone tip resistance (qc) data obtained from a static cone penetration test on a stiff clay deposit are analyzed by using random field theory; and statistical parameters, such as the mean, variance, and autocorrelation function, are estimated in evaluating the reliability of the allowable bearing capacity of a strip footing founded on the above deposit.Key words: reliability-based design, soil variability, random field, variance, autocorrelation function, bearing capacity.


2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Olchawa ◽  
Andrzej Zawalski

Abstract Bearing capacity of cohesive soils was calculated based on PN-B-03020:1981P and Eurocode 7. Strength parameters of cohesive soil modified by the authors: shear strength in undrained conditions cu, effective cohesion c' and effective friction angle φ' were adopted for calculations acc. to Eurocode 7. Values of these parameters depend on a leading parameter - liquidity index IL. Bearing capacity was calculated for two pad foundations of a size B × L = 2.0 × 3.0 m and 1.5 × 2.0 m and for one 2.0 × 14.0 m strip foundation. The capacity calculated acc. to EC 7 was reduced by multiplying by a factor α = 0.87 to account for different bearing capacity coefficients in Polish Norms and Eurocodes. Performed calculations showed comparable bearing capacity of substratum irrespective of adopted norms EC 7 and PN for foundation pads. In all analysed cases, however, the bearing capacity of foundation strips calculated acc. to Eurocode 7 was higher than those calculated acc. to PN-B-03020:1981P. The reason is in the values and ways of accounting partial security coefficients and in differences in the values of shape coefficients used in the equation for ultimate bearing resistance of soil substratum.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. S. Arndt ◽  
M. C. Laarakker ◽  
H. A. van Lith ◽  
F. J. van der Staay ◽  
F. Ohl

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miklos Iványi ◽  
Miklos Iványi ◽  
Peter Iványi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document