scholarly journals Intestinal Infarction in COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Series

2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-90
Author(s):  
Maryam Sarkardeh ◽  
Amin Dalili ◽  
Naser Tayyebi Meibodi ◽  
Mostafa Izanlu ◽  
Seyed Javad Davari-Sani ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Marconato ◽  
Giulia Nezi ◽  
Giovanni Capovilla ◽  
Lucia Moletta ◽  
Nicola Baldan ◽  
...  

Abstract Mesenteric vein thrombosis (MVT) is a rare condition, often misdiagnosed due to its vague and misleading clinical presentation. It can cause intestinal infarction, peritonitis, and consequently necessitate bowel resection. CT scanning with intravenous contrast enhancement is the gold standard for its diagnosis. Radiologists have an important role in defining the extent of thrombosis and identifying any signs of intestinal infarction influencing the decision whether or not to operate. In patients with no clinical signs of peritonitis or radiological evidence of intestinal infarction, the treatment can be exclusively medical, based on full anticoagulation (initially with low molecular weight heparin, followed by vitamin K antagonists or direct acting oral-anticoagulants). The duration of medical treatment depends on radiological evidence of resolution of thrombosis and the identification of pro-coagulant risk factors.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 202-203
Author(s):  
Mireya Perez-Guzman ◽  
Alfredo Nava de la Vega ◽  
Arturo Pena Velarde ◽  
Tania Raisha Torres Victoria ◽  
Froylan Martinez-Sanchez ◽  
...  

VASA ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grotenhermen

Background: To investigate the hypothesis that cases of arteritis similar to thromboangiitis obliterans (TAO) and associated with the use of cannabis were caused by cannabis or THC (dronabinol), or that cannabis use is a co-factor of TAO. Patients and methods: A systematic review on case reports and the literature on so-called cannabis arteritis, TAO, and cardiovascular effects of cannabinoids was conducted. Results: Fifteen reports with 57 cases of an arteritis associated with the use of cannabis and two additional case series of TAO, in which some patients also used cannabis, were identified. Clinical and pathological features of cannabis-associated arteritis do not differ from TAO and the major risk factor of TAO, tobacco use, was present in most, if not in all of these cases. The proposed pathophysiological mechanisms for the development of an arteritis by cannabis use are not substantiated. Conclusions: The hypothesis of cannabis being a causative factor or co-factor of TAO or an arteritis similar to TAO is not supported by the available evidence. The use of the term “cannabis arteritis” should be avoided until or unless more convincing scientific support is forthcoming.


2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilie Thomas ◽  
Joaquin Poundja ◽  
Alain Brunet ◽  
Jacques Tremblay

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Schumacher ◽  
Felix Betzler ◽  
Robert Miller ◽  
Clemens Kirschbaum ◽  
Andreas Ströhle
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document