Paroxetine Hydrochloride

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-15
Author(s):  
Daiva Kazlauskienė ◽  
Guoda Kiliuvienė ◽  
Palma Nenortienė ◽  
Giedrė Kasparavičienė ◽  
Ieva Matukaitytė

By conducting the toxicological analysis it is meaningful to determine the analytical system that could identify simultaneously several medicinal preparations quickly and precisely. The purpose of this work was to create and validate the method of thin-layer chromatography that would be suitable to separate the components of antidepressant mixture (amitriptyline hydrochloride, paroxetine hydrochloride, sertraline hydrochloride, fluvoxamine maleate and buspirone hydrochloride) and to identify them. The system was validated with regard to the sensitivity, repetition of data, resistance and particularity. The solvent systems with potential of high separation of components in their mixture were created: acetonitrile, methanol, ammonia solution 25 percent (85:10:5); acetonitrile, methanol, ammonia solution 25 percent (75:20:5); dichlormethane, 1,4-dioxane, ammonia solution 25 percent (50:45:5); dichlormethane, 1,4-dioxane, ammonia solution 25 percent (42:55:3); trichlormethane, 1,4-dioxane, ammonia solution 25 percent (25:70:5); trichlormethane, 1,4-dioxane, ammonia solution 25 percent (60:36:4). One of the most suitable solvent systems for separation of the analyzed mixture (sertraline, amitriptyline, paroxetine, buspirone, fluvoxamine) was determined – acetonitrile, methanol, ammonia solution 25 percent (85:10:5). When this solvent system was used, the average Rf values of the analyzed compounds differed the most. Validation was conducted – the relative standard deviation (RSD, percent) of the average Rf value of the analyzed compounds varied from 0,6 to 1,8 percent and did not exceed the permissible error of 5 percent. The sensitivity of methodology was determined by assessing the intensity of the mixture’s spots on the chromatographic plate. The detection limit of buspirone was 0,0012 µg; sertraline – 0,0008 µg; amitriptyline – 0,0004 µg; fluvoxamine – 0,0004 µg; paroxetine – 0,0008 µg. The resistance of results to the changed conditions – it was determined that when the amounts of the solvents acetonitrile and methanol were increased or decreased to two milliliters, the average Rf values of the analyzed compounds did not change statistically significantly


Pharmaceutics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao Yang ◽  
Zhengwei Huang ◽  
Xuan Zhang ◽  
Jinyuan Li ◽  
Ying Huang ◽  
...  

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the main contributors to disability and suicide mortality globally. Paroxetine hydrochloride (PHH) is the most potent antidepressant used for MDD treatment. Due to its reduced side effects PAXIL® CR is a widely-used controlled-release formulation of PHH. However, the complicated double-layer production of PAXIL® CR faces the risk of layer separation. In this study, PHH enteric coating single layer controlled-release tablets (PHH-EC-SLTs) were designed as a simplified substitution of PAXIL® CR through a rational formulation screening. The optimized PHH-EC-SLTs showed similar release behaviors in vitro to PAXIL® CR and the release profiles corresponded to a zero-order release model (R2 = 0.9958). Polymer matrix erosion was the main release mechanism, according to the fitting exponents n > 1 in the Korsmeyer-Pappas model. Crucial pharmacokinetic parameters including peak-reaching time (Tmax), peak concentration (Cmax) and the area under the blood level-time curve (AUC0-48) of PHH-EC-SLTs and PAXIL® CR had no significant difference (p > 0.05) and the relative bioavailability (F = 97.97%) of PHH-EC-SLTs demonstrated their similar pharmacokinetic profiles in vivo. In view of avoiding layer separation risk and simplifying the preparation processing, the self-made PHH-EC-SLTs could be considered as a safe and economic alternative to PAXIL® CR.


2016 ◽  
Vol 72 (a1) ◽  
pp. s355-s355
Author(s):  
László Fábián ◽  
M. Fátima Pina ◽  
Sarah J. Day ◽  
Annabelle Baker ◽  
Chiu C. Tang ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 827-830
Author(s):  
Julie A. Frisolone ◽  
Monica Ruiz ◽  
Bruce J. Schwartz

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Stearns ◽  
C. Isaacs ◽  
J. Rowland ◽  
J. Crawford ◽  
M.J. Ellis ◽  
...  

ChemInform ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. no-no
Author(s):  
Srinivas Gangula ◽  
Naveen Kumar Kolla ◽  
Chandrasekar Elati ◽  
Ashok Dongamanti ◽  
Rakeshwar Bandichhor

2005 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 860-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guobin Ren ◽  
Jingkang Wang ◽  
Guizhi Li

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document