Microleakage of indirect composite inlays: An in vitro comparison with the direct technique

1992 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 295-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Percy Milleding
2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 295-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos José Soares ◽  
Leonardo Celiberto ◽  
Paula Dechichi ◽  
Rodrigo Borges Fonseca ◽  
Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins

The aim of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of direct and indirect composite inlays by stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Thirty bovine incisors were ground to obtain an incisal platform, simulating the occlusal surface of a human molar. Each tooth received two 8° proximal cavities with cervical finishing line prepared in dentine or enamel. One of the cavities was filled with Filtek Z250/Single Bond, using the direct technique, and the other was filled with with Solidex/Rely X ARC/Single Bond, using the indirect technique. The samples were stored in water at 37°C for 24 hours and placed in a 50% silver nitrate solution for 6 hours in a dark container. Next, the samples were washed under running water, immersed in a developing solution and exposed to fluorescent light for 12 hours. The teeth were then severed and evaluated for dye penetration by stereomicroscopy and SEM. There were no significant differences between the direct and indirect techniques for the cervical finishing line in enamel, but for the finishing line in dentin, the indirect technique allowed less microleakage than the direct technique. SEM analysis showed leakage similar to that observed by stereomicroscopic analysis. The use of stereomicroscopic and SEM evaluations improves microleakage analysis.


2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 563-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Gerdolle ◽  
Eric Mortier ◽  
Carole Loos-Ayav ◽  
Bruno Jacquot ◽  
Marc M. Panighi

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 682-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. S. Duquia ◽  
P. W. R. Osinaga ◽  
F. F. Demarco ◽  
L. V. Habekost ◽  
E. N. Conceição

Clinical Relevance One of the advantages reported for indirect composite restorations is the reduction of polymerization shrinkage, which could produce better marginal sealing. Although sealing of cervical enamel margins was slightly better for the indirect systems used, no difference between indirect and direct restorations was found for cervical margins in cementum/dentin.


2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 967-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulf J. Schlegel ◽  
Klaus Püschel ◽  
Michael M. Morlock ◽  
Katrin Nagel

Author(s):  
Emily Mulvany ◽  
Sara McMahan ◽  
Jiazhu Xu ◽  
Narges Yazdani ◽  
Rebecca Willits ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document