Which Version of the General Health Questionnaire Should be Used in Community Studies?

1983 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. W. Burvill ◽  
M. W. Knuiman

Literature pertinent to the use of the various versions of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) is briefly surveyed. The literature indicates that the 60-item version has the highest reliability and validity coefficients, the lowest misclassification rate, and the highest sensitivity and specificity. Using data from a previously published community survey in Perth using the 60-item GHQ, comparisons are made between use of the 60-, 30-, 20- and 12-item versions, including community prevalence rates, simultaneous identification of cases, disagreement rates and patterns of community rates with age. The 60-item version gives the lowest prevalence rates. It is argued that the 60-item GHQ is probably the best as it gives the lowest misclassification rates, the smallest standard error of estimated prevalence rates and allows measurement of certain subscales not contained within the shorter versions.

1989 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen R. Winefield ◽  
Robert D. Goldney ◽  
Anthony H. Winefield ◽  
Marika Tiggemann

General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) results are given for a large (N = 1013) sample of South Australian young people (average age 19.6 years), to compare the usefulness of the 12-, 28-, and 30-item forms of the GHQ. Internal reliabilities are generally adequate and the Likert scoring method produces significant correlations with psychological measures such as self-esteem. the case-prevalence rate using the binary scoring method was comparable with other studies, but misclassification rates were unacceptably high when DSM-Ill Axis I diagnosis was used as the criterion for the presence of any psychiatric disorder.


1983 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 349-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Banks

SYNOPSISValidity coefficients of the 30-item, 28-item and 12-item versions of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) were determined by comparison with the Present State Examination (PSE) in a sample of 200 17-year-olds. The PSE classified 7 people (3·5%) as cases, although only 47% were identified as free of symptoms. Misclassification rates, sensitivity and specificity values are presented for different cutting scores for the three versions of the GHQ. The GHQ-28 had superior values, especially with a cutting score of 5/6; the GHQ-12 with a 2/3 cutting score also had acceptable values. All versions of the GHQ correlated highly with the PSE Index of Definition and total scores, providing support for the treatment of GHQ scores as a continuous variable in this kind of population. Correlations between sub-scales of the GHQ-28 give further evidence for a general factor and the relative independence of the social dysfunction sub-scale.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 573-590
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Moreta-Herrera ◽  
Daniela Bonilla ◽  
Erika Ruperti-Lucero ◽  
Daniel Gavilanes-Gómez ◽  
Joselyn Zambrano-Estrella ◽  
...  

Objective: To analyse the internal structure of the 28-item version of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28), as well as its reliability and validity in relation to other variables in a sample of Ecuadorian university students. Method: Instrumental design with confirmatory factor analysis using weighted least square mean and variance adjusted (WLSMV) estimator, reliability and convergence and discrimination validity of the GHQ-28. Sample: 495 students (56.6% women), between 18 to 35 years old (M = 24.1 years; SD = 2.1), from three universities (59.6% public) in Ecuador. Results: The bifactor model of the GHQ-28 test has an adequate fit with χ2 = 357.81; p > .05; df = 322; χ2/df = 1.11; CFI = .991; TLI = .989; SRMR = .059; RMSEA = .015 [.000 – .023]; ωH = .93; ECV = .90; PUC = .78. The GHQ-28 is reliable and in terms of convergent validity, it correlates significantly and negatively with mental health, assessed by MHC-SF, and it is discriminant between risk and non-risk cases. Conclusion: The GHQ-28 bifactor model is replicable in Ecuadorian college students.


2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Friedrich ◽  
R Alexandrowicz ◽  
N Benda ◽  
G Cerny ◽  
J Wancata

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document