Head injury in Germany: A population-based prospective study on epidemiology, causes, treatment and outcome of all degrees of head-injury severity in two distinct areas

Brain Injury ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1491-1504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eckhard Rickels ◽  
Klaus von Wild ◽  
Paul Wenzlaff
1984 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 697-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Fife ◽  
Janine Jagger

✓ Several recent population-based studies of the incidence of head injury have identified cases by screening hospitalized patients. This method assumes a close relationship between severity of head injury and overall injury severity, since it is the latter that determines hospital admission. Thus, a patient whose overall injury severity is high will be admitted to the hospital regardless of the degree of his head injury. Similarly, since a patient's outcome status after treatment depends on his response to all his injuries, studies of the prognosis of various types of head injury also assume a close relationship between head injury severity and overall injury severity. The present study examines the relationship between brain injury severity and overall injury severity in a series of hospitalized head-injured patients with evidence of actual or probable brain trauma. Among these patients, brain injury severity was closely related to overall injury severity. Head injury severity and head and neck injury severity were also closely related to overall injury severity. For all other body regions, injury severity was not closely related to overall injury severity in this group of patients.


Brain Injury ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (13-14) ◽  
pp. 1648-1653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pål Rønning ◽  
Per Ole Gunstad ◽  
Nils-Oddvar Skaga ◽  
Iver Arne Langmoen ◽  
Knut Stavem ◽  
...  

BMC Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ola Skaansar ◽  
Cathrine Tverdal ◽  
Pål Andre Rønning ◽  
Karoline Skogen ◽  
Tor Brommeland ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ageing is associated with worse treatment outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI). This association may lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy that affects treatment efficacy. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the role of treatment bias in patient outcomes by studying the intensity of diagnostic procedures, treatment, and overall 30-day mortality in different age groups of patients with TBI. Methods Included in this study was consecutively admitted patients with TBI, aged ≥ 15 years, with a cerebral CT showing intracranial signs of trauma, during the time-period between 2015–2018. Data were extracted from our prospective quality control registry for admitted TBI patients. As a measure of management intensity in different age groups, we made a composite score, where placement of intracranial pressure monitor, ventilator treatment, and evacuation of intracranial mass lesion each gave one point. Uni- and multivariate survival analyses were performed using logistic multinomial regression. Results A total of 1,571 patients with TBI fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median age was 58 years (range 15–98), 70% were men, and 39% were ≥ 65 years. Head injury severity was mild in 706 patients (45%), moderate in 437 (28%), and severe in 428 (27%). Increasing age was associated with less management intensity, as measured using the composite score, irrespective of head injury severity. Multivariate analyses showed that the following parameters had a significant association with an increased risk of death within 30 days of trauma: increasing age, severe comorbidities, severe TBI, Rotterdam CT-score ≥ 3, and low management intensity. Conclusion The present study indicates that the management intensity of hospitalised patients with TBI decreased with advanced age and that low management intensity was associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality. This suggests that the high mortality among elderly TBI patients may have an element of treatment bias and could in the future be limited with a more aggressive management regime.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. e59-e66
Author(s):  
Janet S. Dufek ◽  
Nancy A. Ryan-Wenger ◽  
Jeffrey D. Eggleston ◽  
Kyle C. Mefferd

1996 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 494-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan M. Haltiner ◽  
Nancy R. Temkin ◽  
H. Richard Winn ◽  
Sureyya S. Dikmen

AbstractThis study examined the relationship of posttraumatic seizures and head injury severity to neuropsychological performance and psychosocial functioning in 210 adults who were prospectively followed and assessed 1 year after moderate to severe traumatic head injury. Eighteen percent (n = 38) of the patients experienced 1 or more late seizures (i.e., seizures occurring 8 or more days posttrauma) by the time of the 1-year followup. As expected, the head injured patients who experienced late posttraumatic seizures were those with the most severe head injuries, and they were significantly more impaired on the neuropsychological and psychosocial measures compared to those who remained seizure free. However, after the effects of head injury severity were controlled, there were no significant differences in neuropsychological and psychosocial outcome at 1 year as a function of having seizures. These findings suggest that worse outcomes in patients who develop posttraumatic seizures up to 1 year posttrauma largely reflect the effects of the brain injuries that cause seizures, rather than the effect of seizures. (JINS, 1996, 2, 494–504.)


2013 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 1074-1080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zane B. Perkins ◽  
Marc D. Wittenberg ◽  
Daniel Nevin ◽  
David J. Lockey ◽  
Ben O’Brien

Brain Injury ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 479-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Green ◽  
Martin L. Rohling ◽  
Grant L. Iverson ◽  
Roger O. Gervais

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document