Use of emergency departments and primary care visits for asthma related conditions in the 3 years following an asthma education program

2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 288-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Gaudreau ◽  
Henrik Stryhn ◽  
Carolyn Sanford ◽  
Connie Cheverie ◽  
Janette Conklin ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yee Hyung Kim ◽  
Kwang Ha Yoo ◽  
Jee-Hong Yoo ◽  
Tae-Eun Kim ◽  
Deog Kyeom Kim ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 109 (8) ◽  
pp. 991-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis-Philippe Boulet ◽  
Marie-Ève Boulay ◽  
Guylaine Gauthier ◽  
Livia Battisti ◽  
Valérie Chabot ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S200-S200
Author(s):  
Michael Hansen ◽  
Barbara Trautner ◽  
Roger Zoorob ◽  
George Germanos ◽  
Osvaldo Alquicira ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Use of antibiotics without a prescription (non-prescription use) contributes to antimicrobial resistance. Non-prescription use includes obtaining and taking antibiotics without a prescription, taking another person’s antibiotics, or taking one’s own stored antibiotics. We conducted a quantitative survey focusing on the factors that impact patients’ decisions to use non-prescription antibiotics. Methods We surveyed patients visiting public safety net primary care clinics and private emergency departments in a racially/ethnically diverse urban area. Surveys were read aloud to patients in Spanish and English. Survey domains included patients’ perspectives on which syndromes require antibiotic treatment, their perceptions of health care, and their access to antibiotics without a prescription. Results We interviewed 190 patients, 122 from emergency departments (64%), and 68 from primary care clinics (36%). Overall, 44% reported non-prescription antibiotic use within the past 12 months. Non-prescription use was higher among primary care clinic patients (63%) than the emergency department patients (39%, p = 0.002). The majority felt that antibiotics would be needed for bronchitis (78%) while few felt antibiotics would be needed for diarrhea (30%) (Figure 1). The most common situation identified “in which respondents would consider taking antibiotics without contacting a healthcare provider was “got better by taking this antibiotic before” (Figure 2). Primary care patients were more likely to obtain antibiotics without prescription from another country than emergency department patients (27% vs. 13%, P=0.03). Also, primary care patients were more likely to report obstacles to seeking a doctor’s care, such as the inability to take time off from work or transportation difficulties, but these comparisons were not statistically significant. Figure 1. Patients’ agreement that antibiotics would be needed varied by symptom/syndrome. Figure 2. Situations that lead to non-prescription antibiotic use impacted the two clinical populations differently Conclusion Non-prescription antibiotic use is a widespread problem in the two very different healthcare systems we included in this study, although factors underlying this practice differ by patient population. Better understanding of the factors driving non-prescription antibiotic use is essential to designing patient-focused interventions to decrease this unsafe practice. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


Author(s):  
Joanne Huang ◽  
Zahra Kassamali Escobar ◽  
Todd S. Bouchard ◽  
Jose Mari G. Lansang ◽  
Rupali Jain ◽  
...  

Abstract The MITIGATE toolkit was developed to assist urgent care and emergency departments in the development of antimicrobial stewardship programs. At the University of Washington, we adopted the MITIGATE toolkit in 10 urgent care centers, 9 primary care clinics, and 1 emergency department. We encountered and overcame challenges: a complex data build, choosing feasible outcomes to measure, issues with accurate coding, and maintaining positive stewardship relationships. Herein, we discuss solutions to challenges we encountered to provide guidance for those considering using this toolkit.


2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 425-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariam M. Kawafha ◽  
Loai Issa Tawalbeh

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 282-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jovan Antović

»Point-of-Care« D-Dimer TestingD-dimer testing is efficient in the exclusion of venous thromboembolism (VTE). D-dimer laboratory assays are predominantly performed in centralised laboratories in intra-hospital settings although most patients with suspected VTE are presented in primary care. On the other hand decreasing turnaround time for laboratory testing may significantly improve efficacy in emergency departments. Therefore an introduction of a rapid, easy to perform point of care (POC) assay for the identification of D-dimer may offer improvement in diagnostics flow of VTE both in primary care and emergency departments while it could also improve our diagnostic possibilities in some other severe clinical conditions (e.g. disseminated intra-vascular coagulation (DIC) and aortic aneurism (AA)) associated with increased D-dimer. Several POC D-dimer assays have been evaluated and majority of them have met the criteria for rapid and safe exclusion of VTE. In our hands three assays (Stratus, Pathfast and Cardiac) have the laboratory performance profile comparable with our routine D-dimer laboratory assay (Tinaqaunt).


2021 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 158-163
Author(s):  
Juliet S.K. Ng ◽  
Janita P.C. Chau ◽  
Aileen W.K. Chan ◽  
Jacky K.C. Lui ◽  
James W.C.H. Cheng

2005 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. S145
Author(s):  
T. Tavarkiladze ◽  
S. Kearney ◽  
K. Garrett-Szymanski ◽  
A. Khadavi ◽  
Y. Persaud ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Whitney Pollio ◽  
Emily M. Patton ◽  
Lynn S. Nichols ◽  
Deborah A. Bowers

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Gruppo di lettura di Reggio Emilia

5 days of antibiotic for uncomplicated pneumonia is enough: the non-inferiority results of the SAFER RCT The most important guidelines for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) indicate amoxicillin as the drug of first choice, however there is a lack of evidence-based indications about the duration of this therapy. This study conducted in 2 emergency departments in Canada randomized 281 children aged 6 months to 10 years with CAP without the need for hospitalization to treatment with high-dose amoxicillin for 5 days versus a traditional 10 day therapy. In terms of clinical recovery, both groups presented comparable results. In fact, the “per protocol” analysis, recommended for a “non-inferiority” design, did not formally provide this result. The exclusively clinical recruitment criteria (any investigations were optional), well reflect the reality of primary care, and the results, albeit with some limitations, suggest that in uncomplicated CAP, brief therapy should be considered in the guidelines.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document