Aspects of femoral neck anteversion

1988 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 689-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Høiseth ◽  
O. Reikerås ◽  
E. Fønstelien
2021 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 144-149
Author(s):  
Jessie Mackay ◽  
Pam Thomason ◽  
Morgan Sangeux ◽  
Elyse Passmore ◽  
Kate Francis ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 133 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 36-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goran Cobeljic ◽  
Zoran Bajin ◽  
Zoran Vukasinovic ◽  
Aleksandar Lesic ◽  
Momirka Vukicevic

INTRODUCTION Medial rotation deformity of the hip is a problem to patients who are handicapped by cerebral palsy but able to walk, because the knees point inward during gait (?kissing patellae") and cause falls and frequent injuries. Knees and ankles are subject to stress and, therefore, they assume compensating positions. Lower legs assume position of valgus and external rotation, whereas feet rotate either inwards or outwards. Secondary deformities make gait more difficult and cause rapid tear of footwear. AIM The purpose of the paper was to retrospectively analyze the effects of transposition of the gluteus medius and minimus muscles, a procedure introduced for the first time in our country in order to correct the deformity. A new method of binding the muscles by wire was described. There had been no previous experience with this method. METHOD This operation was indicated in patients with spastic form of cerebral palsy, who were able to walk, who had difficulties in gait and whose lateral rotation was less than 10? along with the medial rotation of over 70? of the hip on the side of the deformity. Additional prerequisite for the operation was the absence of flexion contracture of more than 15? of either the hip or the knee on the side of deformity, as there is possibility of aggravation of the flexion hip deformity due to transposed gluteal muscles (now in front of the hip joint). Fifteen hips of 10 patients were operated on. Five patients were operated on bilaterally at one time. The average age was 8 (6-12) years. The majority of patients, 8 (80%) were aged between 6 and 8. The average follow-up was 5 years (3-8). The assessment of the results was based on the comparison of rotational abilities of both hips before and after the operation (in unilateral and bilateral deformities), as well as on individual complaints before and after the operation. In patients with unilateral deformity, their ?healthy" hips were the control hips. The analysis of the femoral neck anteversion before and after operation was performed. RESULTS Average values of medial and lateral rotation of the deformed hips before operation exhibited significant statistical difference when compared to control hips. The difference of average values of rotatory movements of control and operated hips was not statistically significant after operation. The difference of average preoperative values of the femoral neck anteversion in hips with deformity was statistically significant (49.40?4.63? compared to 32.8?3.1G). Postoperative average values of anteversion in operated and control hips were not statistically significant. The difference between average preoperative (49.40?4.63?) and postoperative (35.80?7.66?) values of the femoral neck anteversion was statistically significant. Excellent results were achieved in 5 (50%) patients, i.e. 8 (53.3%) hips; good results were achieved in 3 (30%) patients, i.e. 5 (33.3%) hips; poor result in 2 (20%) patients, i.e. 2 (13.3%) hips. All 5 patients who had undergone surgery of both hips had symmetric outcome. Three patients had excellent results, while two had good results. Patients with excellent and good results (80% of patients, 86.6% of hips) showed neither weakening of the operated hip abduction nor pelvic instability (positive Trendelenburgh hip test). No complications were recorded postoperatively. CONCLUSION Transposition of gluteal muscles can be recommended in patients under 10 years of age as there is still a chance for their femoral neck to change orientation, to decrease the anteversion and thus to achieve long-lasting effect. Fixation of transposed muscles by wire proved to be effective.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine M. Harper ◽  
Adam D. Sylvester ◽  
Robert K. McAfee ◽  
Siobhán B. Cooke

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. S54
Author(s):  
M. Sangeux ◽  
C. Harris ◽  
L. Donnan ◽  
H.K. Graham

2014 ◽  
Vol 96-B (12) ◽  
pp. 1586-1593 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Li ◽  
Y. Wang ◽  
J. K. Oni ◽  
X. Qu ◽  
T. Li ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 895-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeon Soo Lee ◽  
Seung Hoon Oh ◽  
Jong Keun Seon ◽  
Eun Kyoo Song ◽  
Taek Rim Yoon

1988 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 689-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Høiseth ◽  
O. Reikerås ◽  
E. Fønstelien

Although the general definition of femoral neck anteversion seems to be accepted, the details vary substantially and some measuring methods are based on anatomic prerequisites that are lacking. This may be a cause of inconsistent and incorrect determinations. An anatomic study was therefore performed. Only small differences were found between two neck axes and different methods for delineating the axes. Inconsistent use of the shaft axis gave substantial variations. The long axis of the femoral shaft was, however, not shown to be a source of substantial error. The variation between three different knee axes was substantial. The cross section of the femoral neck was found to be radially asymmetric. Therefore, a precise and unequivocal neck centre cannot be made by any combination of bi-plane projections of the neck.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document