A Prospective Comparative Study of Moderate Versus High Protein Intake for Critically Ill Patients with Acute Renal Failure

Renal Failure ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rinaldo Bellomo ◽  
John Seacombe Bapplsci ◽  
Michael Daskalakis ◽  
Michael Farmer ◽  
Christopher Wright ◽  
...  
Critical Care ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang H. Hartl ◽  
Philipp Kopper ◽  
Andreas Bender ◽  
Fabian Scheipl ◽  
Andrew G. Day ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Proteins are an essential part of medical nutrition therapy in critically ill patients. Guidelines almost universally recommend a high protein intake without robust evidence supporting its use. Methods Using a large international database, we modelled associations between the hazard rate of in-hospital death and live hospital discharge (competing risks) and three categories of protein intake (low: < 0.8 g/kg per day, standard: 0.8–1.2 g/kg per day, high: > 1.2 g/kg per day) during the first 11 days after ICU admission (acute phase). Time-varying cause-specific hazard ratios (HR) were calculated from piece-wise exponential additive mixed models. We used the estimated model to compare five different hypothetical protein diets (an exclusively low protein diet, a standard protein diet administered early (day 1 to 4) or late (day 5 to 11) after ICU admission, and an early or late high protein diet). Results Of 21,100 critically ill patients in the database, 16,489 fulfilled inclusion criteria for the analysis. By day 60, 11,360 (68.9%) patients had been discharged from hospital, 4,192 patients (25.4%) had died in hospital, and 937 patients (5.7%) were still hospitalized. Median daily low protein intake was 0.49 g/kg [IQR 0.27–0.66], standard intake 0.99 g/kg [IQR 0.89– 1.09], and high intake 1.41 g/kg [IQR 1.29–1.60]. In comparison with an exclusively low protein diet, a late standard protein diet was associated with a lower hazard of in-hospital death: minimum 0.75 (95% CI 0.64, 0.87), and a higher hazard of live hospital discharge: maximum HR 1.98 (95% CI 1.72, 2.28). Results on hospital discharge, however, were qualitatively changed by a sensitivity analysis. There was no evidence that an early standard or a high protein intake during the acute phase was associated with a further improvement of outcome. Conclusions Provision of a standard protein intake during the late acute phase may improve outcome compared to an exclusively low protein diet. In unselected critically ill patients, clinical outcome may not be improved by a high protein intake during the acute phase. Study registration ID number ISRCTN17829198


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. S186-S187
Author(s):  
W.G. Looijaard ◽  
N. Denneman ◽  
B. Broens ◽  
P.J. Weijs ◽  
H.M. Oudemans-van Straaten

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. S143
Author(s):  
W.G. Looijaard ◽  
E.A. Worner ◽  
A.E. van derVeen ◽  
P.J. Weijs ◽  
H.M. Oudemans-van Straaten

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
José Raimundo Araujo de Azevedo ◽  
Hugo César Martins Lima ◽  
Pedro Henrique Dias Brasiliense Frota ◽  
Ivna Raquel Olimpio Moreira Nogueira ◽  
Suellen Christine de Souza ◽  
...  

Abstract Background We evaluated the efficacy of high protein intake and early exercise versus standard nutrition care and routine physiotherapy on the outcome of critically ill patients. Methods We randomized mechanically ventilated patients expected to stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) for 4 days. We used indirect calorimetry to determine energy expenditure and guide caloric provision to the patients randomized to the high protein and early exercise (HPE) group and the control group. Protein intakes were 1.48 g/kg/day and 1.19 g/kg/day medians respectively; while the former was submitted to two daily sessions of cycle ergometry exercise, the latter received routine physiotherapy. We evaluated the primary outcome physical component summary (PCS) score at 3 and 6 months) and the secondary outcomes (handgrip strength at ICU discharge and ICU and hospital mortality). Results We analyzed 181 patients in the HPE (87) and control (94) group. There was no significant difference between groups in relation to calories received. However, the amount of protein received by the HPE group was significantly higher than that received by the control group (p < 0.0001). The PCS score was significantly higher in the HPE group at 3 months (p = 0.01) and 6 months (p = 0.01). The mortality was expressively higher in the control group. We found an independent association between age and 3-month PCS and that between age and group and 6-month PCS. Conclusion This study showed that a high-protein intake and resistance exercise improved the physical quality of life and survival of critically ill patients. Trial registration Research Ethics Committee of Hospital São Domingos: Approval number 1.487.683, April 09, 2018. The study protocol was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03469882, March 19,2018).


Author(s):  
José Raimundo Araújo de Azevedo ◽  
Hugo Cesar Martins Lima ◽  
Widlani Sousa Montenegro ◽  
Suellen Christine de Carvalho Souza ◽  
Ivna Raquel Olimpio Moreira Nogueira ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document