Patient satisfaction with primary care services in Lithuania

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-32
Author(s):  
Jonas Kairys ◽  
Egle Zebiene ◽  
Virginijus Sapoka
2017 ◽  
pp. 53-61
Author(s):  
Minh Tam Nguyen ◽  
Thi Hoa Nguyen

Background: Patient satisfaction is an important indicator of healthcare quality. Better satisfaction is associated with greater adherence to treatment and better health outcomes. Primary care is considered the basic structure of many healthcare systems. Evaluation of healthcare provision is essential in the ongoing assessment and consequent quality improvement of healthcare services. Objective: To describe and analyze the determinants associated with patient assessment and satisfaction in primary care. Methods: The survey was conducted with 519 households and 209 patients at 18 commune health centers. The questionnaire included sociodemographic variables, health status, and use and satisfaction with primary care services. We undertook descriptive analyses, bivariate correlations to study the relationship between levels of satisfaction and the explanatory variables for demographics, health status and health services for households and patients. Results: The majority of households and patients were satisfied with the health care services at primary health care facilities. Satisfaction of waiting time, communication and counseling by healthcare providers was high. We found significant associations between the level of satisfaction and owning health insurance card, the first contact point assigned at CHCs, the severity of illness episodes, and health condition of participants. Conclusions: The results provide evidence on factors that should be taken into account in the planning and development of health policies with respect to the quality and delivery of primary care services in order to enhancing the satisfaction of clients. Key words: consumer satisfaction, patient satisfaction, primary care, quality indicators


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Odeny ◽  
Jeremy Penner ◽  
Jayne Lewis-Kulzer ◽  
Hannah H. Leslie ◽  
Starley B. Shade ◽  
...  

HIV departments within Kenyan health facilities are usually better staffed and equipped than departments offering non-HIV services. Integration of HIV services into primary care may address this issue of skewed resource allocation. Between 2008 and 2010, we piloted a system of integrating HIV services into primary care in rural Kenya. Before integration, we conducted a survey among returning adults ≥18-year old attending the HIV clinic. We then integrated HIV and primary care services. Three and twelve months after integration, we administered the same questionnaires to a sample of returning adults attending the integrated clinic. Changes in patient responses were assessed using truncated linear regression and logistic regression. At 12 months after integration, respondents were more likely to be satisfied with reception services (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 2.71, 95% CI 1.32–5.56), HIV education (aOR 3.28, 95% CI 1.92–6.83), and wait time (aOR 1.97 95% CI 1.03–3.76). Men's comfort with receiving care at an integrated clinic did not change (aOR = 0.46 95% CI 0.06–3.86). Women were more likely to express discomfort after integration (aOR 3.37 95% CI 1.33–8.52). Integration of HIV services into primary care services was associated with significant increases in patient satisfaction in certain domains, with no negative effect on satisfaction.


2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Boltonl ◽  
Michael Mira

The objective of this study was to examine the interaction between patients' choice of care, their satisfaction with that care, and waiting time. Patient satisfaction and waiting times were recorded in three primary care settings in Sydney. The results show that patients in Australian primary care services do not like to wait, and those for whom waiting time is a determinant of choice are easier to satisfy than those for whom it is not, irrespective of the wait. Primary care services may be made be made more satisfying for consumers if consumers are better engaged in choosing their health care.


2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (04) ◽  
pp. 398-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yakup Akpinar ◽  
Hakan Demirci ◽  
Ersin Budak ◽  
Ayse Karalar Baran ◽  
Ali Candar ◽  
...  

AimTo identify the reasons why patients with minor complaints choose emergency departments (EDs) as a first contact of care and whether dissatisfaction with primary care services influences their decisions.MethodsIn this study, a self-completed survey called EUROPEP was given to 535 outpatients who were admitted to the XXXXX Hospital in Bursa and examined in the green zone in July 2015. Patients were asked about their complaints and why they preferred EDs as a first contact of care.ResultsEDs were the first contact of care in 87.8% of cases. In all, 9% of patients registered to family physicians who were working outside the city of Bursa. There was no relationship between patient satisfaction and the number of previous visits to EDs in last 12 months (P=0.09). The main reasons for admitting to the emergency services were feeling excessive pain (20.4%), perception of urgency (14.5%) and that the family doctor services were closed outside working hours (13.2%). The mean patient satisfaction with family practice offices was calculated to be 68.1%.ConclusionsThe frequency of admission to EDs as a first contact of care was extremely high in the absence of a referral system. Patients who did not have family doctors in the settlement where they live put an extra burden on the EDs. Overall, patient satisfaction with their GPs did not influence the number of visits to EDs but accessibility remains a big challenge.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document