An Enigma: Outcome Measurement in Speech and Language Therapy

1999 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard L. Lapointe
2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Overton ◽  
Yvonne Wren

The ultimate aim of intervention for children with language impairment is an improvement in their functional language skills. Baseline and outcome measurement of this is often problematic however and practitioners commonly resort to using formal assessments that may not adequately reflect the child’s competence. Language sampling, transcription and analysis provide a more thorough and realistic picture of a child’s abilities but are time consuming and usually considered unfeasible in the typical clinic setting. This article reports on a pilot study in which a speech and language therapy assistant (SLTA) carried out language transcription using language analysis software. Following a brief initial training period, the SLTA carried out transcriptions on 17 language samples at two time periods. Reliability between a speech and language therapist and the assistant’s transcriptions were calculated and were found to be acceptable for the majority of measures taken. The use of software by assistants is proposed as a viable alternative for outcome measurement of naturalistic language skills.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. e100085
Author(s):  
Kathryn Moyse ◽  
Pamela Enderby ◽  
Katie Chadd ◽  
Kamini Gadhok ◽  
Mark Bedwell ◽  
...  

BackgroundEvidencing the impact of speech and language therapy interventions is challenging. The UK’s professional body for speech and language therapists (SLTs) is supporting a consistent approach to outcome measurement and analysis using Therapy Outcome Measures (TOMs).ObjectiveTo develop a digital solution for collecting TOMs data, evaluate the impact of therapeutic interventions and explore contributing factors to outcome variation across clinical areas.MethodAgile methodology was applied to software development. Organisations were recruited to provide data. Criteria were identified to exemplify outcome variability.ResultsA digital tool was developed. 21 organisations provided data on 16 356 individuals. Improvement in at least one domain of TOMs occurred in 77.1% of instances. Data for two clinical areas exemplify the tool’s effectiveness in highlighting the impact of speech and language therapy.ConclusionThis established outcomes data set can be used to evaluate the impact of speech and language therapy, and explore variation in outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document