Anatomic Pathology

1996 ◽  
pp. 75-88
Author(s):  
T Hodge ◽  
S Gosselin
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 237428952110068
Author(s):  
Kara S. Tanaka ◽  
Rageshree Ramachandran

In mid-March 2020, our institution removed most medical students from in-person clinical clerkships due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Department of Pathology responded by transitioning a fourth-year clinical elective to an all-remote format composed of synchronous didactics, daily clinical sign-out utilizing digital microscopy, and asynchronous learning materials. Thirty-seven medical students completed 2- or 4-week anatomic pathology electives tailored to meet their career goals and allowing them to progress toward graduation. Institutional Review Board approval was granted to survey students’ perceptions of engagement in the remote learning environment. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using a standardized school-wide end-of-rotation survey, an online survey developed by the authors, and students’ self-directed learning goals. End-of-rotation data showed the remote pathology course performed well (4.88 of possible 5) when compared to all advanced clinical clerkships (4.51, n = 156 courses), all elective rotations (4.41, n = 50 courses), and the traditional in-person pathology elective (4.73). Core strengths in the virtual environment included high educational value, flexibility of content and schedule, organization, tailoring to an individual’s learning goals, and a positive education environment. Deficits included the inability to gross surgical specimens, inadequate observation or feedback about students’ skills, and impaired social connections. Areas for improvement included requests for in-person experiences and development of themed tracks for career exploration. Many aspects of anatomic pathology appear well-suited to the remote learning environment. While the remote model may not be sufficient for students pursuing careers in pathology, it can be adapted to increase nonpathologists’ understanding of interdisciplinary clinical collaboration with pathologists.


2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 376-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott R. Owens ◽  
Ulysses G.J. Balis ◽  
David R. Lucas ◽  
Jeffrey L. Myers

Pathology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. S80-S81
Author(s):  
Nicholas Roetger ◽  
Gordon Wright

2006 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 638-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan F. Silverman ◽  
Telma C. Pereira

Abstract Similar to critical values (CVs) in clinical pathology, occasional diagnoses in surgical pathology and cytology could require immediate notification of the physician to rapidly initiate treatment. However, there are no established CV guidelines in anatomic pathology. A retrospective review of surgical pathology reports was recently conducted to study the incidence of CVs in surgical pathology and to survey the perceptions of pathologists and clinicians about CVs in surgical pathology, with a similar analysis of CVs performed in cytology. The results indicated that CVs in surgical pathology and cytology are uncommon but not rare and that there is a wide range of opinion among pathologists and between pathologists and clinicians about the need for an immediate telephone call and about the degree of urgency. It was obvious from the study that there is a lack of consensus in identifying what constitutes surgical pathology and cytology CV cases. Since the Institute of Medicine's report on medical errors, there has been an increasing number of initiatives to improve patient safety. Having guidelines for anatomic pathology CVs could enhance patient safety, in contrast to the current practice in which CV cases are managed based on common sense and on personal experience. Therefore, a discussion involving the pathology community might prove useful in an attempt to establish anatomic pathology CV guidelines that could represent a practice improvement.


2006 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 641-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia A. LiVolsi ◽  
Stanley Leung

Abstract Critical values in anatomic pathology are usually information sensitive, whereas most such values in laboratory medicine are time sensitive. However, there is an important time element in anatomic pathology as well. Pathologists should be aware that many medicolegal actions against radiologists are based on failure to communicate “abnormal” results in a timely manner. Are pathologists the next group that will be targeted? Pathologists can spend much time trying to communicate important data that will affect patient care to someone who will accept the information. This is not an efficient use of pathologists' professional time. Most important, what are our obligations to patients to communicate “critical” abnormal results to the treating physician? What results need to be so communicated? Are pathologists obliged to contact the patient directly if there is a failure to communicate the critical results to a clinician? We explore these questions to promote discussion of these important issues as they relate to pathologists' liability and to patient care.


Author(s):  
Baltasar Eduardo Lema ◽  
Alejandra Maciel
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Banks ◽  
Richard Brown ◽  
Alex Laslowski ◽  
Yvonne Daniels ◽  
Phil Branton ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 457-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicoletta Urbano ◽  
Manuel Scimeca ◽  
Elena Bonanno ◽  
Orazio Schillaci

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document