Methodological issues in evidence-based evaluation of treatment for recurrent miscarriage

2007 ◽  
pp. 269-282
2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Simnett ◽  
Elizabeth Carson ◽  
Ann Vanstraelen

SUMMARY We present a comprehensive review of the 130 international archival auditing and assurance research articles that were published in eight leading accounting and auditing journals for 1995–2014. In order to support evidence-based international standard setting and regulation, and to identify what has been learned to date, we map this research to the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board's (IAASB) Framework for Audit Quality. For the areas that have been well researched, we provide a summary of the findings and outline how they can inform standard setters and regulators. We also observe a significant evolution in international archival research over the 20 years of our study, as evidenced by the measures of audit quality, data sources used, and approaches used to address endogeneity concerns. Finally, we identify some challenges in undertaking international archival auditing and assurance research and identify opportunities for future research. Our review is of interest to researchers, practitioners, and standard setters/regulators involved in international auditing and assurance activities.


2021 ◽  
pp. 108876792110469
Author(s):  
Lynn A. Addington

Over the past 25 years, homicide researchers have largely ignored older adults. This pattern continues even in light of the ongoing demographic shift associated with the aging baby boomer generation. This article reflects on the current state of the literature and discusses areas in need of attention. Future research needs can be categorized into substantive and methodological issues. The insights gained by exploring these topics can generate nuanced explanations for fatal violence against older adults and support future evidence-based prevention policies.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Channing Burks ◽  
Mary D Stephenson ◽  
Danny J Schust

The objective of this review is to highlight central issues relating to recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), including use of updated terminologies, updated criteria for initiating an RPL evaluation, and an evidence-based standard diagnostic evaluation. RPL is a condition characterized by repeated spontaneous demise of pregnancy. It is a multifactorial disorder that affects approximately 5% of couples in the general population who are trying to have a child. RPL should be defined as two or more pregnancy losses at any gestational age; these do not necessarily need to be consecutive. As 50 to 70% of pregnancy losses of less than 10 weeks gestational age are due to random numeric chromosome errors, we recommend chromosome testing of miscarriage tissues with the second and all subsequent miscarriages less than 10 weeks gestational age. If the second pregnancy loss is “unexplained,” meaning that the chromosome content is euploid (46,XX of pregnancy origin, 46,XY, or a balanced structural chromosomal rearrangement), then an RPL diagnostic evaluation is indicated. Despite a comprehensive evaluation, approximately 40% of couples with RPL will not have a specific etiologic factor identified. In these couples, as with all couples experiencing RPL, empirical management with close monitoring and supportive care during the first trimester is associated with encouraging subsequent live birth rates.   This review contains 10 figures, 5 tables and 57 references Key words: factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss, idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss, miscarriage chromosome testing, nonvisualized pregnancy loss, pregnancy of unknown location, recurrent miscarriage, recurrent pregnancy loss


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document