scholarly journals Comedy of Manners in the Importance of Being Earnest

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume-3 (Issue-2) ◽  
pp. 710-711
Author(s):  
Mrs. M. Kokila ◽  
Mrs. S. Abarna ◽  
Keyword(s):  
1958 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 281
Author(s):  
W. H. Van Voris ◽  
Dale Underwood

PMLA ◽  
1915 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-78
Author(s):  
Edward Chauncey Baldwin

Every reader of the Restoration comedy of manners cannot fail to be impressed with the frequent occurrence of the character-sketch. Often this is of a typical personage having no part in the action, as when in Wycherley's Plain Dealer, Novel and Olivia together in dialogue form describe Lady Autumn, her daughter, and a fop, none of whom appears in the play. Again, one notices a marked use of the dramatic convention of making one actor describe another who is about to enter. A typical instance occurs in the scene just mentioned when Novel describes in the form of a “character,” Lord Plausible, and is interrupted by that gentleman's entrance.


1992 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-102
Author(s):  
Mary Doyle Springer

1924 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
M. Andrewes

Greek New Comedy, as we know it from references and fragmentary MSS., is the meeting-place of three confluent streams—comedy of manners, Aristophanic comedy, and tragedy. From Sicilian comedy, through Epicharmus at Syracuse and Crates and Pherecrates at Athens, it inherited certain stock stage figures, and a tradition of ‘invented’ plots and sententious speech. Old Comedy it resembled in its fun and informality and many stage conventions; and, indeed, the resemblance was so marked, in at least one of the later plays of Aristophanes, that the writer of his life, mistaking effect for cause, claimed the lost Cocalus as the original model of New Comedy. Perhaps most important of all was the influence of tragedy; and this influence may be estimated by a direct comparison between Euripides and Menander, both in the spirit and form of their plays and in the social and philosophic theories underlying them.


1987 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-152
Author(s):  
Mary Doyle Springer
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 9 (35) ◽  
pp. 267-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Carlson

This paper explores some of the many factors which affect the way in which the critical response to a production is made manifest. Using the reception of Timberlake Wertenbaker's The Love of the Nightingale and Our Country's Good as case studies, Susan Carlson contrasts the enthusiastic response to the first production of the latter play at the Royal Court, where its supposed celebration of the redemptive effects of theatricality were widely acclaimed, with the subjection of the former to the ‘atavistic guilts of male theatre reviewers’. Examining the reception of later productions – and even the West End transfer – of Our Country's Good, she proceeds to show how different theatres, companies, and senses of cultural, sexual, and national identity shaped ever-changing attitudes towards what was presumed to be the same play. Susan Carlson, whose article ‘Comic Collisions: Convention, Rage, and Order’ appeared in NTQ12 (November 1987), is Professor of English at lowa State University, and the author of Women of Grace: James's Plays and the Comedy of Manners (1985) and Women and Comedy: Rewriting the British Theatrical Tradition (1991). She is now working on issues of performance and collaboration in contemporary theatre, and writing about the work of the Omaha Magic Theatre and the playwriting of Karim Alrawi.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document