scholarly journals Manual and automatic evaluation of machine translation between European languages

Author(s):  
Philipp Koehn ◽  
Christof Monz
2011 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bushra Jawaid ◽  
Daniel Zeman

Word-Order Issues in English-to-Urdu Statistical Machine Translation We investigate phrase-based statistical machine translation between English and Urdu, two Indo-European languages that differ significantly in their word-order preferences. Reordering of words and phrases is thus a necessary part of the translation process. While local reordering is modeled nicely by phrase-based systems, long-distance reordering is known to be a hard problem. We perform experiments using the Moses SMT system and discuss reordering models available in Moses. We then present our novel, Urdu-aware, yet generalizable approach based on reordering phrases in syntactic parse tree of the source English sentence. Our technique significantly improves quality of English-Urdu translation with Moses, both in terms of BLEU score and of subjective human judgments.


2017 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Martínez Garcia ◽  
Carles Creus ◽  
Cristina España-Bonet ◽  
Lluís Màrquez

Abstract We integrate new mechanisms in a document-level machine translation decoder to improve the lexical consistency of document translations. First, we develop a document-level feature designed to score the lexical consistency of a translation. This feature, which applies to words that have been translated into different forms within the document, uses word embeddings to measure the adequacy of each word translation given its context. Second, we extend the decoder with a new stochastic mechanism that, at translation time, allows to introduce changes in the translation oriented to improve its lexical consistency. We evaluate our system on English–Spanish document translation, and we conduct automatic and manual assessments of its quality. The automatic evaluation metrics, applied mainly at sentence level, do not reflect significant variations. On the contrary, the manual evaluation shows that the system dealing with lexical consistency is preferred over both a standard sentence-level and a standard document-level phrase-based MT systems.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Anand Kumar ◽  
B. Premjith ◽  
Shivkaran Singh ◽  
S. Rajendran ◽  
K. P. Soman

Abstract In recent years, the multilingual content over the internet has grown exponentially together with the evolution of the internet. The usage of multilingual content is excluded from the regional language users because of the language barrier. So, machine translation between languages is the only possible solution to make these contents available for regional language users. Machine translation is the process of translating a text from one language to another. The machine translation system has been investigated well already in English and other European languages. However, it is still a nascent stage for Indian languages. This paper presents an overview of the Machine Translation in Indian Languages shared task conducted on September 7–8, 2017, at Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, India. This machine translation shared task in Indian languages is mainly focused on the development of English-Tamil, English-Hindi, English-Malayalam and English-Punjabi language pairs. This shared task aims at the following objectives: (a) to examine the state-of-the-art machine translation systems when translating from English to Indian languages; (b) to investigate the challenges faced in translating between English to Indian languages; (c) to create an open-source parallel corpus for Indian languages, which is lacking. Evaluating machine translation output is another challenging task especially for Indian languages. In this shared task, we have evaluated the participant’s outputs with the help of human annotators. As far as we know, this is the first shared task which depends completely on the human evaluation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 1497-1506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pairui Li ◽  
Chuan Chen ◽  
Wujie Zheng ◽  
Yuetang Deng ◽  
Fanghua Ye ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilin Zhang ◽  
Zhen Weng ◽  
Wenyan Xiao ◽  
Jianyi Wan ◽  
Zhiming Chen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document