scholarly journals Controls of River Dynamics on Residence Time and Biogeochemical Reactions of Hydrological Exchange Flows in A Regulated River Reach

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuehang Song ◽  
Xingyuan Chen ◽  
John Zachara ◽  
Jesus Gomez-Velez ◽  
Pin Shuai ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 598 ◽  
pp. 126283
Author(s):  
Xuehang Song ◽  
Yilin Fang ◽  
Jie Bao ◽  
Huiying Ren ◽  
Zhuoran Duan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Pin Shuai ◽  
Xingyuan Chen ◽  
Xuehang Song ◽  
Glenn Hammond ◽  
John Zachara ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 2593-2612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pin Shuai ◽  
Xingyuan Chen ◽  
Xuehang Song ◽  
Glenn E. Hammond ◽  
John Zachara ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuehang Song ◽  
Xingyuan Chen ◽  
John M. Zachara ◽  
Jesus D. Gomez‐Velez ◽  
Pin Shuai ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huiying Ren ◽  
Xuehang Song ◽  
Yilin Fang ◽  
Z. Jason Hou ◽  
Timothy D. Scheibe

Hydrologic exchange between river channels and adjacent subsurface environments is a key process that influences water quality and ecosystem function in river corridors. High-resolution numerical models were often used to resolve the spatial and temporal variations of exchange flows, which are computationally expensive. In this study, we adopt Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) approaches for deriving reduced order models of hydrologic exchange flows and associated transit time distributions, with integrated field observations (e.g., bathymetry) and hydrodynamic simulation data (e.g., river velocity, depth). The setup allows an improved understanding of the influences of various physical, spatial, and temporal factors on the hydrologic exchange flows and transit times. The predictors also contain those derived using hybrid clustering, leveraging our previous work on river corridor system hydromorphic classification. The machine learning-based predictive models are developed and validated along the Columbia River Corridor, and the results show that the top parameters are the thickness of the top geological formation layer, the flow regime, river velocity, and river depth; the RF and XGB models can achieve 70% to 80% accuracy and therefore are effective alternatives to the computational demanding numerical models of exchange flows and transit time distributions. Each machine learning model with its favorable configuration and setup have been evaluated. The transferability of the models to other river reaches and larger scales, which mostly depends on data availability, is also discussed.


2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 284-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen M. Svendsen ◽  
Carl E. Renshaw ◽  
Francis J. Magilligan ◽  
Keith H. Nislow ◽  
James M. Kaste

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 2715-2730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tian Zhou ◽  
Jie Bao ◽  
Maoyi Huang ◽  
Zhangshuan Hou ◽  
Evan Arntzen ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 602-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Å. Brabrand ◽  
T. Bremnes ◽  
A. G. Koestler ◽  
G. Marthinsen ◽  
H. Pavels ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 39-54
Author(s):  
Annalisa Minelli ◽  
Gary Parker ◽  
Paolo Tacconi ◽  
Corrado Cencetti

The extreme versatility in different research fields of GRASS GIS is well known. A tool for the vertical sorting of sediments in river dynamics analysis is illustrated in this work. In particular, a GRASS GIS python module has been written which implements a forecasting sorting model by Blom&Parker (2006) to analyze river bed composition’s evolution in depth in terms of grainsize. The module takes a DEM and information relative to the bed load transport composition as input. It works in two different and consecutive phases: the first one uses the GRASS capabilities in analyzing geometrical features of the river bed along a chosen river reach, the second phase is the "numerical" one and implements the forecasting model itself, then executes statistical analyses and draws graphs, by the means of matplotlib library. Moreover, a specific procedure for the import of a laser scanner cloud of points is implemented, in case the raster DEM map is not available. At the moment, the module has been applied using flumes data from Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory (Minneapolis, MN) and some first results have been obtained, but the "testing" phase on other flume’s data is still in progress. Moreover the module has been written for GRASS 65 on a Ubuntu Linux machine, even if the debugging of a GRASS 64, Windowsversion, is also in progress. The final aim of this work is the application of the model on natural rivers, but there are still some drawbacks. First of all the need of a high resolution DEM in input, secondly the number and type of data in input (for example the bed load composition in volume fraction per each size considered) which is not easily obtainable, so the best solution is represented by testing the model on a well instrumented river reach to export in future the forecasting method to un-instrumented reaches.


Water ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tian Zhou ◽  
Maoyi Huang ◽  
Jie Bao ◽  
Zhangshuan Hou ◽  
Evan Arntzen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document