Missing Data in Experiments: Challenges and Solutions
Missing data is a common feature of experimental datasets. Standard methods used by psychology researchers to handle missingness rely on unrealistic assumptions, invalidate random assignment procedures, and bias estimates of effect sizes. In this tutorial, we describe different classes of missing data typically encountered in experimental datasets, and we discuss how each of them impacts researchers' causal inferences. We provide concrete guidelines for handling each class of missingness, focusing on two methods that make realistic assumptions: i) Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) for mild instances of missingness, and ii) Double Sampling and Bounds for severe instances of missingness. After reviewing the reasons why these methods increase the accuracy of researchers' estimates of effect sizes, we provide lines of R code that researchers may use in their own analyses.