scholarly journals Costs of inefficient regulation: Evidence from the Bakken

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Lade ◽  
Ivan Rudik

Efficient pollution regulation equalizes marginal abatement costs across sources. We study a new flaring regulation in North Dakota and document its efficiency. We attribute most of the observed flaring reductions at new wells in the state since late 2014 to the regulation. We construct firm-specific marginal abatement cost curves and find that the same quantity of flaring reductions could have been achieved at 44% lower cost by taxing flared gas instead of imposing firm-specific requirements. Taxing flared gas at the existing public lands royalty rate would achieve 99% of the flaring reductions at 46% lower cost.

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian Wagner ◽  
Markus Amann ◽  
Jens Borken-Kleefeld ◽  
Janusz Cofala ◽  
Lena Höglund-Isaksson ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 182 ◽  
pp. 705-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera Eory ◽  
Sylvain Pellerin ◽  
Gema Carmona Garcia ◽  
Heikki Lehtonen ◽  
Ieva Licite ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
José Luis Ponz-Tienda ◽  
Andrea Victoria Prada-Hernández ◽  
Alejandro Salcedo-Bernal ◽  
Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 4335-4349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Sjöstrand ◽  
Andreas Lindhe ◽  
Tore Söderqvist ◽  
Peter Dahlqvist ◽  
Lars Rosén

Abstract As water scarcity and drought become more common, planning to avoid their consequences becomes crucial. Measures to prevent the impact of new climate conditions are expected to be extensive, costly and associated with major uncertainties. It is therefore necessary that policymakers and practitioners in both the public and private sector can compare possible mitigation measures in order to make economically rational investment decisions. For this to be successful, decision-makers need relevant decision support. This paper presents a novel approach of constructing marginal abatement cost curves for comparing water scarcity mitigation measures while taking the underlying uncertainties into account. Uncertainties in input variables are represented by probability distributions and calculations are performed using Monte Carlo simulations. This approach is applied on the island of Gotland, one of the most water-stressed parts of Sweden, to provide the first marginal abatement cost curve in Europe for water scarcity mitigation in which municipal, agricultural, industrial and household measures are compared. The results show that the agricultural measure of on-farm storage has the greatest potential to increase water availability on the island. Among municipal measures, increased groundwater extraction and desalination offer the greatest potential, although desalination is almost 25 times more costly per cubic meter. The most cost-effective measure is linked to hot water savings in the hotel industry. The approach presented provides a quantitative visualization of the financial trade-offs and uncertainties implied by different mitigation measures. It provides critical economic insights for all parties concerned and is thus an important basis for decision-making.


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 703-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrien Vogt-Schilb ◽  
Stéphane Hallegatte ◽  
Christophe de Gouvello

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (24) ◽  
pp. 242002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominic Moran ◽  
M Macleod ◽  
E Wall ◽  
V Eory ◽  
A Mcvittie ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document