Update on Soybean Rust in Iowa

Author(s):  
Daren S. Mueller
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Ralph von Qualen ◽  
Xiao-Bing Yang

Author(s):  
Ralph von Qualen ◽  
Xiao-Bing Yang

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 4177-4198
Author(s):  
Renato Herrig Furlanetto ◽  
Marcos Rafael Nanni ◽  
Monica Sayuri Mizuno ◽  
Luís Guilherme Teixeira Crusiol ◽  
Camila Rocco da Silva

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jhonatan Paulo Barro ◽  
Kaique S. Alves ◽  
Cláudia V. Godoy ◽  
Alfredo R. Dias ◽  
Carlos A. Forcelini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Roger Boerma ◽  
Maria J. Monteros ◽  
Bo-Keun Ha ◽  
E. Dale Wood ◽  
Daniel V. Phillips ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 107 (10) ◽  
pp. 1187-1198 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Wen ◽  
C. R. Bowen ◽  
G. L. Hartman

Dispersal of urediniospores by wind is the primary means of spread for Phakopsora pachyrhizi, the cause of soybean rust. Our research focused on the short-distance movement of urediniospores from within the soybean canopy and up to 61 m from field-grown rust-infected soybean plants. Environmental variables were used to develop and compare models including the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, zero-inflated Poisson/regular Poisson regression, random forest, and neural network to describe deposition of urediniospores collected in passive and active traps. All four models identified distance of trap from source, humidity, temperature, wind direction, and wind speed as the five most important variables influencing short-distance movement of urediniospores. The random forest model provided the best predictions, explaining 76.1 and 86.8% of the total variation in the passive- and active-trap datasets, respectively. The prediction accuracy based on the correlation coefficient (r) between predicted values and the true values were 0.83 (P < 0.0001) and 0.94 (P < 0.0001) for the passive and active trap datasets, respectively. Overall, multiple machine learning techniques identified the most important variables to make the most accurate predictions of movement of P. pachyrhizi urediniospores short-distance.


2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 1029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aguida M. A. P. Morales ◽  
Jamie A. O'Rourke ◽  
Martijn van de Mortel ◽  
Katherine T. Scheider ◽  
Timothy J. Bancroft ◽  
...  

Rpp4 (Resistance to Phakopsora pachyrhizi 4) confers resistance to Phakopsora pachyrhizi Sydow, the causal agent of Asian soybean rust (ASR). By combining expression profiling and virus induced gene silencing (VIGS), we are developing a genetic framework for Rpp4-mediated resistance. We measured gene expression in mock-inoculated and P. pachyrhizi-infected leaves of resistant soybean accession PI459025B (Rpp4) and the susceptible cultivar (Williams 82) across a 12-day time course. Unexpectedly, two biphasic responses were identified. In the incompatible reaction, genes induced at 12 h after infection (hai) were not differentially expressed at 24 hai, but were induced at 72 hai. In contrast, genes repressed at 12 hai were not differentially expressed from 24 to 144 hai, but were repressed 216 hai and later. To differentiate between basal and resistance-gene (R-gene) mediated defence responses, we compared gene expression in Rpp4-silenced and empty vector-treated PI459025B plants 14 days after infection (dai) with P. pachyrhizi. This identified genes, including transcription factors, whose differential expression is dependent upon Rpp4. To identify differentially expressed genes conserved across multiple P. pachyrhizi resistance pathways, Rpp4 expression datasets were compared with microarray data previously generated for Rpp2 and Rpp3-mediated defence responses. Fourteen transcription factors common to all resistant and susceptible responses were identified, as well as fourteen transcription factors unique to R-gene-mediated resistance responses. These genes are targets for future P. pachyrhizi resistance research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document