scholarly journals TRANSLATIONS OF FRENCH SYMBOLIST POETS (CH.BAUDELAIRE, A.RIMBAUD) BY V. BRUSOV

2018 ◽  
pp. 330-339
Author(s):  
KARINA HOVHANNISYAN

The article considers the translations of French poetry (Ch. Baudelaire, A. Rimbaud) made by V. Brusov and by other masters of the Russian poetic translation in different periods.

Translationes ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-74
Author(s):  
Ildikó Szilágyi

Abstract The present study examines modern and contemporary French poetry from the point of view of its translation into Hungarian. Firstly, the French and Hungarian traditions of poetic translation are summarized briefly. Then the possibility of translation of “verset” (long verse), not recognized in Hungarian poetry as a modern poetic genre, is discussed. Particular attention is called to the return of several contemporary French poets to traditional versification, and to the difficulties of Hungarian translators to suggest the importance of this return. Finally, the Hungarian translation of Roubaud’s volume of poetry (Quelque chose noir) invites reflection on the constraints of Oulipo


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-178
Author(s):  
Trask Roberts

Self-translators are often granted freedoms in their translations unimaginable for standard translators. Whereas a standard translation usually prizes sameness (or invisibility as Lawrence Venuti argues), the self-translator may instead highlight difference or disruption. A burgeoning subfield of criticism has outlined the ways in which one of the most famous of these self-translators, Samuel Beckett, makes use of his role as translator to further the reach of his work beyond the constraints of a monolingual text. Whereas most of this criticism has taken aim at Beckett's prose and theater, this essay asks what can be gleaned about Beckett's translation style from his early poetry. Here I focus on Beckett's four-line, untitled poem which begins ‘je voudrais que mon amour meure’ (‘I would like my love to die’). Originally published in 1948 in the bilingual journal Transition Forty-eight, this poem would go on to be edited, translated, reedited, and retranslated over the course of nearly thirty years. The various iterations and translations of the poem are not always harmonious and instead force the reader to consider more deeply the themes of the poem and to question the role of translation. I read the poem in light of Beckett's 1934 essay ‘Recent Irish Poetry’ as well as consider it in response to W.B. Yeats' 1899 poem ‘He Wishes His Beloved Were Dead’. By situating the poem in this context, I argue that this poem is a manifestation of Beckett's argument in the essay that poetry must take into account the division between poet and object. His short poem demonstrates this division as well as that between original and translation and thus allows us a window onto his translation project at large. Considering Beckett's poetic translation permits us to consider how a complementarity of intention towards language does not necessarily entail complementary translations.


1997 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 739
Author(s):  
Andrew Rothwell ◽  
Russell King ◽  
Bernard McGuirk
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document