A persistent paradox: Drug law and policy in Canada

1999 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia G. Erickson
Keyword(s):  
AJIL Unbound ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 301-306
Author(s):  
Álvaro Santos

Drug policy in the American hemisphere is in flux. After decades whereby a prohibitionist regime reigned supreme and proposing alternatives was taboo, several countries have begun to reconsider policy, particularly in the case of marijuana. International law has been instrumental in building the legal and institutional regime of prohibition, and it has remained largely impervious to critiques of its disastrous consequences. Indeed, when it comes to drug law and policy, international law has been part of the problem. Nevertheless, countries in the Americas have begun to adopt innovative strategies that also embrace international obligations. In this essay, I examine the failures of the law and order paradigm behind prohibition. I then analyze legal reforms in the Americas as motivated by three different perspectives: 1) human rights, 2) public health and 3) political economy. Each one offers a powerful challenge to prohibition but relies on different assumptions and offers different transformative potential.


2002 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenz Böllinger

Drug use and drug control are theoretically — in terms of both social psychology and sociology — viewed as complementary components of a complex social and historical interaction process. Subsequently historical and other evidence is presented to substantiate the theoretical hypotheses. This lays the ground for the presentation and interpretation of the actual drug control system in Germany and the European Union. Again some theoretical hypotheses and their empirical grounding are presented concerning the logic of development trends. In the final part, the evolution of drug laws and their implementation are viewed. Recent developments can be regarded as taking place in stages based on certain changeable paradigms: the abstinence paradigm, the medicalization paradigm and the acceptance paradigm. For the time being there seems to be a slow transition from the first to the latter, implying that elements of all three are presently active in a diversity of policies and strategies, differing between states and regions of the German federal state and the European Union as well as between different levels of drug policy and drug care.


1988 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-37
Author(s):  
Alex Wodak
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document