Huck, G.J., & Goldsmith, J.A. Ideology and Linguistic Theory: Noam Chomsky and the Deep Structure Debates. London: Routledge, 1995Huck, G.J., & Goldsmith, J.A. Ideology and Linguistic Theory: Noam Chomsky and the Deep Structure Debates. London: Routledge, 1995. Pp. 186.

Author(s):  
Susanne Carroll
1998 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 766
Author(s):  
John N. Green ◽  
Geoffrey J. Huck ◽  
John A. Goldsmith

Language ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 406
Author(s):  
Julia S. Falk ◽  
Geoffrey J. Huck ◽  
John A. Goldsmith

Volumes about language teaching and language acquisition have been coming out ever since Noam Chomsky had leveled at structural linguistic theory. Books have been written about the approaches and methods of teaching a language. But the Undenying fact is that those volumes have failed to suggest an obvious impact on the listener. Though we have traditional methods such as “Audio lingual method” and “situational language teaching method”, none has brought the desired result..


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-187
Author(s):  
Javier Arias

The present paper constitutes a brief advance of much longer and more detailed ongoing work on the concept of “trace” in contemporary linguistic theory, particularly in syntax. It is commonly believed that the idea was coined by Noam Chomsky. However, we already detect its use, with a very accurate value, in the early work of Zellig Harris on mathematical linguistics or, to be more precise, on mathematical structures of language. In its origins, rather than being an index responsible for marking the location occupied by a unit previous to its syntactic movement (which always takes the form of fronting ), the trace was the result of a matrix product between n-adic functions. Thus, in Harris the trace is primarily a concept anchored in matrix calculus, or, put it differently, an algebraic notion. Chomsky’s notion, on its turn, is closely related with the LISP programming language. This text seeks to provide a preliminary analysis of the conceptual complexity implied in the concept of trace, which linguists should become aware of, for otherwise they will be doomed to be entangled in misunderstandings unfruitful to our discipline for decades to come.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-301
Author(s):  
Conor Barry

Abstract This essay explores the use of the notions of grammar and governmentality in the work of Michel Foucault and Noam Chomsky. The goal is to exhibit the contrast but also mutual influence of these thinkers. Chomsky places his own linguistic theory in what he calls a tradition of Cartesian linguistics. Foucault’s presents an archaeology of general grammar in the French Classical Era. Chomsky and Foucault equally posit principles of governmentality. Both differ in terms of what they think the study of language brings to our understanding of ethical and political freedom. Governmental structure and grammatical structure, for Foucault, are always conventional, rather than essential – merely expressions of power dynamics. For Chomsky, the innate and natural human universality implied by underlying structures, in contrast, intimates a path to freedom from governmental coercion and oppression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document