scholarly journals Fostering Clinical–Research Partnerships to Advance Physiotherapy Practice: The Role of an Innovative Neuro-Rehabilitation Clinic

2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth L. Inness ◽  
Mark Bayley ◽  
Louis Biasin ◽  
Karen Brunton ◽  
Cynthia J. Danells ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Sourav Bhattacharjee

In this second Expert Perspective video with Sourav Bhattacharjee of the University College Dublin, Sourav discusses how nanomedicine is being used in clinical research, with particular emphasis on the role of nanomedicine and nanotechnology in cancer treatment.


Author(s):  
Elizabeth Biswell R ◽  
Michael Clark ◽  
Michela Tinelli ◽  
Gillian Manthorpe ◽  
Joanne Neale ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-456
Author(s):  
James R Rogers ◽  
Hollis Mills ◽  
Lisa V Grossman ◽  
Andrew Goldstein ◽  
Chunhua Weng

Abstract Scientific commentaries are expected to play an important role in evidence appraisal, but it is unknown whether this expectation has been fulfilled. This study aims to better understand the role of scientific commentary in evidence appraisal. We queried PubMed for all clinical research articles with accompanying comments and extracted corresponding metadata. Five percent of clinical research studies (N = 130 629) received postpublication comments (N = 171 556), resulting in 178 882 comment–article pairings, with 90% published in the same journal. We obtained 5197 full-text comments for topic modeling and exploratory sentiment analysis. Topics were generally disease specific with only a few topics relevant to the appraisal of studies, which were highly prevalent in letters. Of a random sample of 518 full-text comments, 67% had a supportive tone. Based on our results, published commentary, with the exception of letters, most often highlight or endorse previous publications rather than serve as a prominent mechanism for critical appraisal.


2004 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ihor Gussak ◽  
Jeffrey Litwin ◽  
Robert Kleiman ◽  
Scott Grisanti ◽  
Joel Morganroth

2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Chester ◽  
ED Kennedy ◽  
S Hynd ◽  
DR Matthews

2018 ◽  
Vol 128 (6) ◽  
pp. 1823-1829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsa Magro ◽  
Jean-Christophe Gentric ◽  
André Lima Batista ◽  
Marc Kotowski ◽  
Chiraz Chaalala ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe management of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) remains controversial. The Treatment of Brain AVMs Study (TOBAS) was designed to manage patients with bAVMs within a clinical research framework. The objective of this study was to study trial feasibility, recruitment rates, patient allocation to the various management groups, and compliance with treatment allocation.METHODSTOBAS combines two randomized care trials (RCTs) and a registry. Designed to be all-inclusive, the study offers randomized allocation of interventional versus conservative management to patients eligible for both options (first RCT), a second RCT testing the role of preembolization as an adjunct to surgery or radiotherapy, and a registry of patients managed using clinical judgment alone. The primary outcome of the first RCT is death from any cause or disabling stroke (modified Rankin Scale score > 2) at 10 years. A pilot phase was initiated at one center to test study feasibility, record the number and characteristics of patients enrolled in the RCTs, and estimate the frequency of crossovers.RESULTSAll patients discussed at the multidisciplinary bAVM committee between June 2014 and June 2016 (n = 107) were recruited into the study; 46 in the randomized trials (23 in the first RCT with 21 unruptured bAVMs, 40 in the second RCT with 17 unruptured bAVMs, and 17 in both RCTs), and 61 patients in the registry. Three patients crossed over from surgery to observation (first RCT).CONCLUSIONSClinical research was successfully integrated with normal practice using TOBAS. Recruitment rates in a single center are encouraging. Whether the trial will provide meaningful results depends on the recruitment of a sufficient number of participating centers.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02098252 (clinicaltrials.gov)


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 1622363
Author(s):  
Memduh Sahin ◽  
Aylin Yetim ◽  
Fehmi Ates

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document