Testing Spatial Transferability of Activity-Based Travel Forecasting Models

Author(s):  
John L. Bowman ◽  
Mark Bradley

This paper reports results from the second phase of a two-phase FHWA-sponsored project to test and demonstrate empirically the transferability of activity-based model (ABM) systems between regions. With data obtained from the 2008–2009 National Household Travel Survey, researchers estimated ABMs simultaneously for 13 metropolitan regions in seven U.S. states. Statistical tests were used to test transferability, including tests of regional differences in the model coefficients, likelihood ratio tests of model equivalence, and transferability indexes, which measure the degree of model differences. In addition, differences in prediction sensitivity between locally estimated and transferred models were tested. The project overall found evidence in favor of transferability. It also found that parameters associated with land use, logsum accessibilities, and travel time and cost caused the biggest problems with transferability. Finally, the study found that transferring within a state or between regions with similar urban density improves transferability. This paper presents the data, models, and testing methods used in the project and includes details of all tests and results related to the improved transferability associated with model transfers from regions within the same state or with similar urban density. The conclusion of the study was that agencies considering transfer of an ABM from another region would do well to find a region within the same state or with similar urban density that has a model that is well supported by a large household travel survey data set.

Author(s):  
Ryland Lu

This paper addresses academic discourse that critiques urban rail transit projects for their regressive impacts on the poor and proposes bus funding as a more equitable investment for urban transit agencies. The author analyzed data from the 2012 California Household Travel Survey on transit trips in Los Angeles County. The author cross-tabulated data on the modal breakdown of transit trips by household income category and on the breakdown of household income associated with trips by bus and rail transit modes. The author also comparatively evaluated the speed of trips (as a ratio of miles per hour) taken by rail and by bus by low-income households in the county. The author found convincing evidence that, on average, trips low-income households made by rail transit covered a greater distance per hour than trips taken by bus transit, but that trips made on the county’s bus rapid transit services with dedicated rights-of-way had a higher mean speed than those taken by rail. Moreover, the mode and income cross-tabulations indicate that rail transit projects only partially serve low-income households’ travel needs. To the extent that equitable transit planning entails minimizing the disparities in access, both rail and bus rapid transit projects can advance social justice if they are targeted at corridors where they can serve travel demand by low-income, transit dependent households.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 100820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna K. Porter ◽  
Eleftheria Kontou ◽  
Noreen C. McDonald ◽  
Kelly R. Evenson

Urban Science ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Conway ◽  
Deborah Salon ◽  
David King

The advent of ridehailing services such as Uber and Lyft has expanded for-hire vehicle travel. We use data from the 2017 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) to investigate the extent of this expansion in the United States. We report changes in the for-hire vehicle market since ridehailing services became available and statistically estimate the determinants of ridehailing use. From 2009–2017, the for-hire vehicle market share doubled. While for-hire vehicles still only account for 0.5% of all trips, the percent of all Americans who use ridehailing in any given month is nearly 10%. Within the for-hire vehicle market, this trend of growth has not been uniformly distributed across demographic groups or geographies; it has been greater in mid-sized and large cities, and among younger individuals and wealthier households. This suggests that understanding the equity implications of ridehailing is an important avenue for research. Multivariate analysis provides evidence that both transit and nonmotorized transport use are correlated with ridehailing use, that ridehailing has a negative relationship with vehicle ownership, and that residents of denser areas have higher ridehailing use. Given the rapid growth of ridehailing, it has become important for cities to include for-hire vehicles in their planning going forward. These NHTS data provide a starting point, but more detailed and frequent data collection is needed to fully understand this many-faceted, rapidly-changing market.


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 335-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Christopher Zegras ◽  
Menghan Li ◽  
Talip Kilic ◽  
Nancy Lozano-Gracia ◽  
Ajinkya Ghorpade ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 383-393
Author(s):  
Olivier Richard ◽  
Mathieu Rabaud

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document