Daily, Long-Term Intermittent Fasting for the Prevention of PSA-Recurrence in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy

Author(s):  
2000 ◽  
pp. 101-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHRISTOPHER L. AMLING ◽  
MICHAEL L. BLUTE ◽  
ERIK J. BERGSTRALH ◽  
THOMAS M. SEAY ◽  
JEFFREY SLEZAK ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 862-869 ◽  
Author(s):  
TAKAHIKO HACHIYA ◽  
YASUHIRO OKADA ◽  
NOZOMU KAWATA ◽  
DAISAKU HIRANO ◽  
TOSHIO YOSHIDA ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 193 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Gandaglia ◽  
Nazareno Suardi ◽  
Marco Bianchi ◽  
Paolo Dell'Oglio ◽  
Umberto Capitanio ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mojtaba NOUHI ◽  
Seyed Masood MOUSAVI ◽  
Alireza OLYAEEMANESH ◽  
Nasser SHAKSISALIM ◽  
Ali AKBARI SARI

Background: The present study aimed to compare the long-term clinical and functional outcomes of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy compared to the watchful waiting. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and reference lists of relevant marker studies were scrutinized from inception to Jan 2018. Two reviewers conducted data abstraction and quality assessment of included trials independently. Quality of included studies were assessed by using Cochrane checklist. Inverse-variance and Mantel-Haenszel estimates under random effects model were used to pool results as relative risks with 95% confidence interval. Heterogeneity was assessed by using I2. Results: Three randomized controlled trials with 1568 participants were included. Compared to watchful waiting, radical prostatectomy had no significant effect on all-cause mortality at 12-year follow-up. However, radical prostatectomy had significant effect on reducing prostate-cause mortality at 12-year follow-up. We found significant lower prostate-cause mortality in patients with PSA>10 and GS≥7 scores who had undergone radical prostatectomy compared with patients in watchful waiting group. In addition, younger patients undergoing surgery developed lower distant metastases rate compared to another approach. Watchful waiting had a significant effect on erectile and urinary incontinence during 2 years. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between radical prostatectomy and watchful waiting on all-cause mortality. However, the radical prostatectomy was associated with statistically lower prostate-cause mortality and metastases rates. Compared with older men, younger men experienced better clinical outcomes. Moreover, watchful waiting had better effect on reducing erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence among patients during 2 years compared to radical prostatectomy.  


Health of Man ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 0 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
С. О. Возіанов ◽  
С. М. Шамраєв ◽  
М. Д. Соснін ◽  
А. М. Леоненко ◽  
А. А. Грицаюк

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 210-210
Author(s):  
P. Sooriakumaran ◽  
T. Field ◽  
M. John ◽  
R. Leung ◽  
A. Tewari

210 Background: There are known variations in cancer survival based on race and treatment choices. We report the long-term survival probability, based on race, in 16,508 men with localized prostate cancer treated either conservatively or by radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy. Methods: We extracted survival data from tumor registries of six Cancer Research Network sites in the United States. Patients were stratified into four racial groups: Caucasians, African Americans, Hispanics, and Asians. The Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used to compare long-term survival in the three treatment groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and competing risk analysis was also performed. Results: Survival was improved for patients who underwent radical prostatectomy compared to radiotherapy or watchful waiting. This was true for all patients combined (Table) as well as for all races individually. Radiotherapy had at least equivalent survival outcomes as watchful waiting in all groups. The differences between treatments were greater for overall survival than for prostate cancer specific survival in all groups, though the extent of the differences varied by race. Conclusions: Radical prostatectomy increases survival in men with localized prostate cancer compared to both radiotherapy and watchful waiting, especially for Caucasian men. Radiotherapy was at least equivalent to watchful waiting for all races. Racial disparities in outcome may influence treatment choices for men with clinically localized prostate cancer. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]


Author(s):  
Philipp Dahm

This chapter provides a summary of the landmark PIVOT trial that randomized men with clinically localized prostate cancer from the early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era to radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting. Based on long-term follow-up, the study found that surgery provided only small reductions in disease-specific survival but caused substantial side effects. It suggested that many men with clinically localized prostate cancer fare well with watchful waiting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document