Feasibility of Landfill Gas as a Liquefied Natural Gas Fuel Source for Refuse Trucks

2008 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 613-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josias Zietsman ◽  
Muhammad Ehsanul Bari ◽  
Aaron J. Rand ◽  
Bhushan Gokhale ◽  
Dominique Lord ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
Vol 41 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 429-433
Author(s):  
V. E. Gerasimov ◽  
V. A. Peredel'skii ◽  
R. V. Darbinyan

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 605
Author(s):  
Craig Henderson ◽  
David Miller

Recent energy market trends have opened the opportunity to exploit Australian liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a cost-competitive fuel source for power projects in developing markets. Regrettably, having favourable market conditions does not automatically lend itself to projects getting sanctioned and being successful. It is fair to say that the number of projects up and running in the current market is less than expected. This paper aims to explore some of the key reasons why LNG to power projects fail to become a reality and what Australian LNG producers could do to achieve their ambition of creating new markets to sell their LNG into. The paper concludes by outlining several development approaches that are being used in industry and how Australian LNG suppliers can partake in these approaches by standing out from the crowd, framing the opportunity, aligning agreements to the capability of the technology and understanding scale and industrial ecologies.


Author(s):  
Michael E. Iden

The use of liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a line-haul locomotive fuel is not a new idea, despite recent publicity, with previous work stretching back into the 1980s. Intense publicity has been given to recent announcements about developing dual-fuel locomotive engines which can burn natural gas as the primary fuel, using diesel fuel only as a pilot fuel for gas ignition. However, developing a locomotive engine capable of using gaseous fuel may prove to be only one of five major challenges to widespread adoption of LNG as a freight railroad fuel: 1. Dual-fuel line-haul locomotives with engines which can use natural gas fuel must be developed and made available for use. 2. Natural gas fuel must be made available to dual-fuel locomotives, either onboard the locomotive itself or by using LNG tenders coupled to the locomotives. 3. LNG must be stored and available for refueling dual-fuel locomotives or their tenders at logical locations along railroad corridors where such locomotives are to be used. 4. Natural gas (from gas fields or pipelines) must be available along with liquefaction plants to convert the gas into cryogenic LNG fuel. 5. The safe operation of trains and locomotives, and safe maintenance of rolling stock, is paramount and cannot be compromised (nor should the efficiency of the rail system) should dual-fuel locomotives and LNG tenders supplant or replace conventional diesel-fueled locomotives. For LNG to become an effective large-scale freight railroad fuel, all five factors must be managed jointly and treated as a 5-legged technology system. If any one of the five “technology legs” is weak or improperly developed, the entire LNG-based system may be unsuitable in the freight railroad environment.


1999 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 539-541
Author(s):  
R. G. Amamchyan ◽  
V. A. Ignat'ev ◽  
L. E. Polyakov ◽  
O. M. Popov ◽  
V. N. Udut

Neft i gaz ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3-4 (117-1118) ◽  
pp. 125-136
Author(s):  
Kh.S. MERPEYISSOV ◽  
◽  
V.V. FINKO ◽  
V.E. FINKO ◽  
◽  
...  

For implementation of Government Decree on conversion of transport to gas fuel and provision of regions with gas supply the new field-proven technologies for liquefied natural gas production are proposed ensuring the lowest possible production cost of the product. Cost recovery for installations up to one year. Operational life of non-rotating installations is commensurate with the service life of the main gas lines. There are no analogues of such installations in world practice


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document