scholarly journals Results on sociological survey of healthcare specialists and consumers about their opinion on reforms of psychiatric service in Moscow, conducted in 2010–2017

Author(s):  
Anton Valerevich Masyakin

Relevance. Since 2010, in Moscow a plan for the reorganization of the psychiatric service is carried out. In accordance with the WHO plans, reforms is including the reduction of inpatient types of care and expansion of the outpatient unit. Aim. The analysis of the specialists and users opinions of mental health service on its reform. Materials and methods. Specialists and users of mental health services opinions survey regarding the ongoing changes was conducted (900 respondents). Results. Most respondents gave a positive assessment of the reforms. Interviewees believe that reform was necessary, optimization of the number of psychiatric beds and expansion of community-based care were justified, the formation of territorial associations was appropriate, and that the quality of psychiatric care, the work of clinics and day hospitals, the amount of care provided by dispensaries, the territorial availability of outpatient psychiatric care, the availability of outpatient facilities, and the number of places in day hospitals increased. According to the survey, reorganization of the psychiatric service first of all should include the development of psychosocial rehabilitation and psychotherapy, a decrease in the level of hospitalizations, the development of inpatient technologies and continuity in the provision of care. According to respondents, the mental health service needed to improve funding and develop outpatient care. Conclusion: Respondents positively assess the mental health service reforms in Moscow. The psychiatric service reorganization should include the development of psychosocial rehabilitation and psychotherapy, reduction hospitalizations level, inpatient technologies and continuity care provision development. According to respondents, the mental health service needs to improve the funding and development of outpatient care.

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tambri Housen ◽  
Shabnum Ara ◽  
Akmal Shah ◽  
Showkat Shah ◽  
Annick Lenglet ◽  
...  

Abstract Background An extensive body of research exists looking at the level of psychological distress in populations affected by political conflict. Recommended response to psychological distress in humanitarian crises is still based on frameworks for interventions developed in western/European contexts including psychological first aid, counselling and group therapy. While there is growing, but limited, evidence that culturally modified interventions can lead to reduction in symptoms of psychological distress in conflict affected populations, there is a need to understand mental health help-seeking behaviour and mental health service needs from the perspective of affected communities. Methods This study employed a qualitative exploratory research design based on principles of grounded theory. A combination of convenience and snowball sampling was used to recruit 186 adults from the general population to 20 focus group discussions; 95 men, median age 40 years, interquartile range (IQR): 27–48 years and 91 women, median age 40 years IQR: 32–50 years. Trained Kashmiri facilitators used a semi-structured interview guide to ascertain community perceptions on mental illness, help-seeking and service needs from the perspective of communities in the Kashmir Valley. Content analysis of transcripts resulted in the identification of seven overarching themes. Results Common locally recognized symptoms of psychological distress were synonymous with symptoms listed in the Hopkins Symptoms Checklist (HSCL-25) and the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ). Protracted political insecurity was highlighted as a major perceived cause of psychological distress in communities. Mental health help-seeking included traditional/spiritual healers in combination with practitioners of western medicine, with access highlighted as the main barrier. Divergent views were expressed on the effectiveness of treatment received. Participants’ expressed the need for investment in mental health literacy to improve the community’s capacity to recognize and support those suffering from psychological distress. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate the universality of symptoms of psychological distress whilst simultaneously highlighting the importance of recognizing the cultural, spiritual and contextual framework within which psychological distress is understood and manifest. Co-constructed models of community based mental health services are needed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orion Mowbray ◽  
Joseph P. Ryan ◽  
Bryan G. Victor ◽  
Gregory Bushman ◽  
Clayton Yochum ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Khan ◽  
M. Kashif ◽  
L. Wilson ◽  
M. McCauley ◽  
E. Roche

ObjectivesThe objective of the paper was to survey patients’ preference in relation to a continuity, or split, model of inpatient consultant care in the Louth Mental Health Service.MethodsA written survey was administered to all patients attending the Louth Mental Health Service over a 2-week period. Participants were asked for their preferred model of care and clinical information was obtained from their clinical notes.ResultsIn total, 149 patients completed the survey questionnaire and 103 respondents (69%) indicated a preference for a continuity model of inpatient consultant psychiatric care. There was a trend for those who reported a past experience of inpatient hospitalisation to indicate a preference for the continuity model (76% v. 61%, respectively, χ2 3.67, p=0.056).ConclusionsPatients indicate a preference for a continuity model of inpatient psychiatric care and this is important to consider in service planning. More research is needed to evaluate if any model of consultant care is associated with better patient outcomes.


2001 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
John S. Lyons ◽  
Dana Royce Baerger ◽  
Peter Quigley ◽  
Joel Erlich ◽  
Eugene Griffin

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona M. Shattell ◽  
Desmina Hamilton ◽  
Sharon S. Starr ◽  
Courtney J. Jenkins ◽  
Norma Angelica Hinderliter

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document