scholarly journals A Clinical Evaluation of Circulating MiR-106a and Raf-1 as Breast Cancer Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 3513-3520
Author(s):  
Elham Ahmed Mohmmed ◽  
Wafaa Shousha ◽  
Abeer El-Saiid ◽  
Shimaa Ramadan
2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 398-401
Author(s):  
Maha Imam Ahmed Ismail ◽  
◽  
* Manal Basyouni Ahmed * Manal Basyouni Ahmed ◽  
Muneera Al-Sheeha

Breast Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Belén Giorello ◽  
Ayelén Matas ◽  
Pablo Marenco ◽  
Kevin Mauro Davies ◽  
Francisco Raúl Borzone ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 56 (18) ◽  
pp. 5995-6008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neha Bhooshan ◽  
Maryellen Giger ◽  
Darrin Edwards ◽  
Yading Yuan ◽  
Sanaz Jansen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
xixun zhang

Abstract Backgroud: Breast cancer (BC) is an aggressive cancer with a high percentage recurrence and metastasis. As one of the most common distant metastasis organ in breast cancer, lung metastasis has a worse prognosis than that of liver and bone. Therefore, it’s important to explore some potential prognostic markers associated with the lung metastasis in breast cancer for preventive treatment. Methods: In our study, transcriptomic data and clinical information of breast cancer patients were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Co-expression modules was built by Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to find out the royalbule modules which is significantly associated with lung metastasis in breast cancer. Then, co-expression genes were analyzed for functional enrichment. Furthermore, the prognostic value of these genes was assessed by GEPIA Database and Kaplan-Meier Plotter. Results: Results showed that the hub genes, LMNB and CDC20, were up-regulated in breast cancer and indicated worse survival. Therefore, we speculate that these two genes play crucial roles in the process of lung metastasis in breast cancer, and can be used as potential prognostic markers in lung metastasis of breast cancer. Conclusion: Collectively, our study identified two potential key genes in the lung metastasis of breast cancer, which might be applied as the prognostic markers of the precise treatment in breast cancer with lung metastasis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 1041-1048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Smith ◽  
Denise Yardley ◽  
Howard A. Burris ◽  
Richard De Boer ◽  
Dino Amadori ◽  
...  

Purpose The Letrozole (Femara) Versus Anastrozole Clinical Evaluation (FACE) study compared the efficacy and safety of adjuvant letrozole versus anastrozole in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor (HR) –positive and node-positive early breast cancer (eBC). Methods Postmenopausal women with HR-positive and node-positive eBC were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant therapy with either letrozole (2.5 mg) or anastrozole (1 mg) once per day for 5 years or until recurrence of disease. Patients were stratified on the basis of the number of lymph nodes and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status. The primary end point was 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), and the key secondary end points were overall survival and safety. Results A total of 4,136 patients were randomly assigned to receive either letrozole (n = 2,061) or anastrozole (n = 2,075). The final analysis was done at 709 DFS events (letrozole, 341 [16.5%]; anastrozole, 368 [17.7%]). The 5-year estimated DFS rate was 84.9% for letrozole versus 82.9% for anastrozole arm (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.07; P = .3150). Exploratory analysis showed similar DFS with letrozole and anastrozole in all evaluated subgroups. The 5-year estimated overall survival rate was 89.9% for letrozole versus 89.2% for anastrozole arm (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.17; P = .7916). Most common grade 3 to 4 adverse events (> 5% of patients) reported for letrozole versus anastrozole were arthralgia (3.9% v 3.3%, and 48.2% v 47.9% for all adverse events), hypertension (1.2% v 1.0%), hot flushes (0.8% v 0.4%), myalgia (0.8% v 0.7%), dyspnea (0.8% v 0.5%), and depression (0.8% v 0.6%). Conclusion Letrozole did not demonstrate significantly superior efficacy or safety compared with anastrozole in postmenopausal patients with HR-positive, node-positive eBC.


2012 ◽  
Vol 72 (9) ◽  
pp. 2428-2439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamar Geiger ◽  
Stephen F. Madden ◽  
William M. Gallagher ◽  
Juergen Cox ◽  
Matthias Mann

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document