scholarly journals BATS AND TERMITE NESTS: ROOSTING ECOLOGY OF Lophostoma brasiliense(CHIROPTERA: PHYLLOSTOMIDAE) IN COLOMBIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 072-080
Author(s):  
Diego A. Esquivel ◽  
Sergio Peña ◽  
Carlos Aya-Cuero ◽  
Valéria da Cunha Tavares
Keyword(s):  
1996 ◽  
Vol 74 (10) ◽  
pp. 1797-1805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarten J. Vonhof ◽  
Robert M. R. Barclay

We used radiotelemetry to examine the roost-site preferences of four species of tree-roosting bats (Eptesicus fuscus, Lasionycteris noctivagans, Myotis evotis, and M. volans) in southern British Columbia, Canada, by radio-tracking bats to their day roosts. We found a total of 21 roost trees: 14 roosts were beneath loose bark, 5 were in cavities excavated by woodpeckers, and 2 were in natural cavities. Entrance height increased with tree height, but roost entrances tended to be situated below the level of the canopy. Of the 22 tree and site variables examined, only 3 significantly discriminated between roost trees and available trees: tree height, distance to the nearest available tree, and percent canopy closure. Bats preferred tall trees associated with low percent canopy closure and a short distance to the nearest available tree. Bats roosted in western white pine, and to a lesser extent ponderosa pine and western larch, in intermediate stages of decay more often than would be expected at random. Bats switched roosts frequently. The distance between subsequent roost trees was short, suggesting a degree of fidelity to a particular group of trees or area of forest. The number of days of rain during the roosting period significantly influenced the number of days spent in a particular roost, and thus ambient conditions may restrict the frequency with which bats can switch roosts.


2011 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon J. Klug ◽  
Amy S. Turmelle ◽  
James A. Ellison ◽  
Erin F. Baerwald ◽  
Robert M. R. Barclay

Biotropica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 757-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe Chun‐Chia Huang ◽  
Elly Lestari Rustiati ◽  
Meyner Nusalawo ◽  
Tigga Kingston
Keyword(s):  

Biotropica ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 725-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Polly Campbell ◽  
Noah M. Reid ◽  
Akbar Zubaid ◽  
Adura M. Adnan ◽  
Thomas H. Kunz

Mammal Review ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme S. T. Garbino ◽  
Valéria da Cunha Tavares
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Tamika Lunn ◽  
Peggy Eby ◽  
Remy Brooks ◽  
Hamish McCallum ◽  
Raina Plowright ◽  
...  

1. Fruit bats (Family: Pteropodidae) are animals of great ecological and economic importance, yet their populations are threatened by ongoing habitat loss and human persecution. A lack of ecological knowledge for the vast majority of Pteropodid bat species presents additional challenges for their conservation and management. 2. In Australia, populations of flying-fox species (Genus: Pteropus) are declining and management approaches are highly contentious. Australian flying-fox roosts are exposed to management regimes involving habitat modification, either through human-wildlife conflict management policies, or vegetation restoration programs. Details on the fine-scale roosting ecology of flying-foxes are not sufficiently known to provide evidence-based guidance for these regimes and the impact on flying-foxes of these habitat modifications is poorly understood. 3. We seek to identify and test commonly held understandings about the roosting ecology of Australian flying-foxes to inform practical recommendations and guide and refine management practices at flying-fox roosts. 4. We identify 31 statements relevant to understanding of flying-fox roosting structure, and synthesise these in the context of existing literature. We then contribute contemporary data on the fine-scale roosting structure of flying-fox species in south-eastern Queensland and north-eastern New South Wales, presenting a 13-month dataset from 2,522 spatially referenced roost trees across eight sites. 5. We show evidence of sympatry and indirect competition between species, including spatial segregation of black and grey-headed flying-foxes within roosts and seasonal displacement of both species by little red flying-foxes. We demonstrate roost-specific annual trends in occupancy and abundance and provide updated demographic information including the spatial and temporal distributions of males and females within roosts. 6. Insights from our systematic and quantitative study will be important to guide evidence-based recommendations on restoration and management and will be crucial for the implementation of priority recovery actions for the preservation of these species into the future.


2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Villalobos-Chaves ◽  
Jendry Vargas-Murillo ◽  
Emmanuel Rojas-Valerio ◽  
Brian W. Keeley ◽  
Bernal Rodríguez-Herrera

The strong link between bats and their roosts is widely recognized as being particularly significant. Despite this, roosting ecology of bats is poorly understood and much of the basic information is still unknown. In this study, we investigated the availability and occupation patterns of four roost types (trees, caves, termite nests and tents) used by bats at Tirimbina Biological Reserve (TBR), Costa Rica. To accomplish our aim, we systematically surveyed both sides of established trails and transects, looking for understory roosts. Potential roosts were examined for bat presence in order to establish occupation. Roost availability and density were estimated using traveled distances (km) and inspected area (10 m for trees/caves and 15 m for tents/termite nests) of each trail or transect sampled. For the tent roosts, data on taxonomic information of plant modified, type of architecture, condition and construction achievement were also recorded. The area surveyed represented 45.4 % of the total area of the TBR (345 ha). Tents were the most common roost (56.6 % of all roosts, N = 223), followed by trees (24.4 %, N = 96), termite nests (18.8 %, N = 74) and caves (0.2 %, N = 1). We detected only 27 roosts occupied by bats (6.8 % of all roosts, 0.17 occupied roosts/ha). Caves showed the highest occupation rate (100 %, N = 1), followed by trees (17.7 %, N = 17), tents (3.6 %, N = 8) and termite nests (1.3 %, N = 1). We found the roosts for 10 species, representing 33.9 % of the bat fauna documented at the reserve (62 species). Density of roosts per bat species varied between 0.017-0.138 roosts/ha. Phyllostomidae was the best-represented family with Micronycteris microtis representing the most common species encountered. Four distinct tent architectures were documented. Bifid architecture was the most common (133 tents), followed by Conical (47 tents), Apical (27 tents) and Inverted Boat (16 tents). Most of the tents found were healthy (76.7 %, N = 171) and totally constructed (88.8 %, N = 198). Our study demonstrated that occupied bat roosts are difficult to find in the forest. When compared to the roost availability, the low occupation rates suggested that, at least in our study area, roosts might not be a limiting resource. Nevertheless, to confirm this hypothesis, information about fidelity and selection process of the species is fundamental for understanding to what extent these roosts meet the requirements to be inhabited or modified. Worldwide conservation efforts on bats should focus on understanding roosting ecology, especially due to anthropogenic pressures that are continuously reducing the availability of roosts, which undoubtedly contributes to the risk of extinction for specialized and sensitive species.


2019 ◽  
Vol 222 (20) ◽  
pp. jeb204024 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Boerma ◽  
José P. Barrantes ◽  
Charles Chung ◽  
Gloriana Chaverri ◽  
Sharon M. Swartz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document