scholarly journals The indications and timing for operative management of spinal epidural abscess: literature review and treatment algorithm

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. E8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Tuchman ◽  
Martin Pham ◽  
Patrick C. Hsieh

Object Delayed or inappropriate treatment of spinal epidural abscess (SEA) can lead to serious morbidity or death. It is a rare event with significant variation in its causes, anatomical locations, and rate of progression. Traditionally the treatment of choice has involved emergency surgical evacuation and a prolonged course of antibiotics tailored to the offending pathogen. Recent publications have advocated antibiotic treatment without surgical decompression in select patient populations. Clearly defining those patients who can be safely treated in this manner remains in evolution. The authors review the current literature concerning the treatment and outcome of SEA to make recommendations concerning what population can be safely triaged to nonoperative management and the optimal timing of surgery. Methods A PubMed database search was performed using a combination of search terms and Medical Subject Headings, to identify clinical studies reporting on the treatment and outcome of SEA. Results The literature review revealed 28 original case series containing at least 30 patients and reporting on treatment and outcome. All cohorts were deemed Class III evidence, and in all but two the data were obtained retrospectively. Based on the conclusions of these studies along with selected smaller studies and review articles, the authors present an evidence-based algorithm for selecting patients who may be safe candidates for nonoperative management. Conclusions Patients who are unable to undergo an operation, have a complete spinal cord injury more than 48 hours with low clinical or radiographic concern for an ascending lesion, or who are neurologically stable and lack risk factors for failure of medical management may be initially treated with antibiotics alone and close clinical monitoring. If initial medical management is to be undertaken the patient should be made aware that delayed neurological deterioration may not fully resolve even after prompt surgical treatment. Patients deemed good surgical candidates should receive their operation as soon as possible because the rate of clinical deterioration with SEA is notoriously unpredictable. Although patients tend to recover from neurological deficits after treatment of SEA, the time point when a neurological injury becomes irreversible is unknown, supporting emergency surgery in those patients with acute findings.

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 204993611986394
Author(s):  
Anastasia Turner ◽  
Linlu Zhao ◽  
Paul Gauthier ◽  
Suzan Chen ◽  
Darren M. Roffey ◽  
...  

Background: Cervical spinal epidural abscess (CSEA) is a localized infection between the thecal sac and cervical spinal column which may result in neurological deficit and death if inadequately treated. Two treatment options exist: medical management and surgical intervention. Our objective was to analyze CSEA patient outcomes in order to determine the optimal method of treatment. Methods: An electronic literature search for relevant case series and retrospective reviews was conducted through June 2016. Data abstraction and study quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. A lack of available data led to a post hoc decision not to perform meta-analysis of the results; study findings were synthesized qualitatively. Results: 927 studies were identified, of which 11 were included. Four studies were ranked as good quality, and seven ranked as fair quality. In total, data from 173 patients were included. Mean age was 55 years; 61.3% were male. Intravenous drug use was the most common risk factor for CSEA development. Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly cultured pathogen. 140 patients underwent initial surgery, an additional 18 patients were surgically treated upon failure of medical management, and 15 patients were treated with antibiotics alone. Conclusion: The rates of medical management failure described in our review were much higher than those reported in the literature for thoracolumbar spinal epidural abscess patients, suggesting that CSEA patients may be at a greater risk for poor outcomes following nonoperative treatment. Thus, early surgery appears most viable for optimizing CSEA patient outcomes. Further research is needed in order to corroborate these recommendations.


2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 7S
Author(s):  
Isaac Karikari ◽  
Ciaran Powers ◽  
Renee Reynolds ◽  
Ankit Mehta ◽  
Robert Isaacs

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-12
Author(s):  
Sarah Hunter ◽  
Robert Cussen ◽  
Joseph F. Baker

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: The aim of this study is to identify predictive factors associated with failure of nonoperative management of spinal epidural abscess (SEA). Methods: Between January 2007 and January 2017, there were 97 patients 18 years or older treated for SEA at a tertiary referral center. Of these, 58 were initially managed nonoperatively. Details on presenting complaint, laboratory parameters, radiographic evaluation, demographics, comorbidities, and neurologic status (Frankel grades A-E) were collected. Success of treatment was defined as eradication of infection with no requirement for further antimicrobial therapy. Diagnosis of SEA was made via evaluation of imaging and intraoperative findings. Patients with repeat presentation of SEA, children, and those who were transferred for immediate surgical decompression were excluded. Results: Fifty-eight patients initially treated nonoperatively were included. Of these, 21 failed nonoperative management and required surgical intervention. The mean age was 60 years, 66% male, and 19% of Maori ethnicity. Abscess location was predominantly dorsal, and in the lumbar region (53%). Multivariate analysis identified Maori ethnicity, multifocal sepsis, and elevated white cell count as predictors of failure of nonoperative management. With 1 predictor the risk of failure was 44%. In the presence of 2 predictive variables, failure rate increased to 60%, and if all 3 variables were present, patients had a 75% risk of failure. Conclusion: Thirty-six percent of patients treated nonoperatively failed nonoperative management—the failure rate was significantly increased in patients with multifocal sepsis, in patients with elevated white cell count, and in patients of Maori ethnicity.


MedAlliance ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-63

Tuberculous spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is an uncom-mon pathology, which presents is only 2% of all SEA ca-ses. We report a rare cases of cervical-lumbar and thoracic spinal epidural tuberculous abscess occupying the spinal canal from C2–L3 and Th8–Th9 vertebrae with progressive neurological deficit. Clinical features, diagnostic and treat-ment challenges and follow-up results were presented


2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. E4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leopold Arko ◽  
Eric Quach ◽  
Vincent Nguyen ◽  
Daniel Chang ◽  
Vishad Sukul ◽  
...  

Object Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare condition that has previously been treated with urgent surgical decompression and antibiotics. Recent availability of MRI makes early diagnosis possible and allows for the nonoperative treatment of SEA in select patients. The first retrospective review of medically and surgically managed SEA was published in 1999, and since that time several other retrospective institutional reports have been published. This study reviews these published reports and compares pooled data with historical treatment data. Methods A PubMed keyword and Boolean search using (“spinal epidural abscess” OR “spinal epidural abscesses” AND [management OR treatment]) returned 429 results. Filters for the English language and publications after 1999 were applied, as the first study comparing operative and nonoperative management was published that year. Articles comparing operative to nonoperative treatment strategies for SEA were identified, and the references were further reviewed for additional articles. Studies involving at least 10 adult patients (older than 18 years) were included. Case reports, studies reporting either medical or surgical management only, studies not reporting indications for conservative management, or studies examining SEA as a result of a specific pathogen were excluded. Results Twelve articles directly comparing surgical to nonsurgical management of SEA were obtained. These articles reported on a total of 1099 patients. The average age of treated patients was 57.24 years, and 62.5% of treated patients were male. The most common pathogens found in blood and wound cultures were Staphylococcus aureus (63.6%) and Streptococcus species (6.8%). The initial treatment was surgery in 59.7% of cases and medical therapy in 40.3%. This represented a significant increase in the proportion of medically managed patients in comparison with the historical control prior to 1999 (p < 0.05). Patients with no neurological deficits were significantly more likely to be treated medically than surgically (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference overall between surgical and nonsurgical management, although several risk factors may predict failure of medical management. Conclusions . Since the first reports of nonoperative treatment of SEA, there has been a substantial trend toward treating neurologically intact patients with medical management. Nevertheless, medical therapy fails in a fair number of cases involving patients with specific risk factors, and patients with these risk factors should be closely observed in consideration for surgery. Further research may help identify patients at greater risk for failure of medical therapy.


Neurosurgery ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 716-716
Author(s):  
Kathryn Beauchamp ◽  
Bryan J. Duke ◽  
Ronald N. Baxter ◽  
Kerry E. Brega ◽  
Anna Cajade-Law ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (7) ◽  
pp. 546-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akash A. Shah ◽  
Paul T. Ogink ◽  
Sandra B. Nelson ◽  
Mitchel B. Harris ◽  
Joseph H. Schwab

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document