Minimally invasive anteroposterior combined surgery using lateral lumbar interbody fusion without corpectomy for treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis associated with osteoporotic vertebral collapse

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Kentaro Fukuda ◽  
Hiroyuki Katoh ◽  
Yuichiro Takahashi ◽  
Kazuya Kitamura ◽  
Daiki Ikeda
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Combined Surgery ◽  
Vertebral Collapse ◽  
Short Segment ◽  
Canal Stenosis ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Osteoporotic Vertebral Collapse ◽  
Anterior Support ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

OBJECTIVE Various reconstructive surgical procedures have been described for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) with osteoporotic vertebral collapse (OVC); however, the optimal surgery remains controversial. In this study, the authors aimed to report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of their novel, less invasive, short-segment anteroposterior combined surgery (APCS) that utilized oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and posterior fusion without corpectomy to achieve decompression and reconstruction of anterior support in patients with LSCS-OVC. METHODS In this retrospective study, 20 patients with LSCS-OVC (mean age 79.6 years) underwent APCS and received follow-up for a mean of 38.6 months. All patients were unable to walk without support owing to severe low-back and leg pain. Cleft formations in the fractured vertebrae were identified on CT. APCS was performed on the basis of a novel classification of OVC into three types. In type A fractures with a collapsed rostral endplate, combined monosegment OLIF and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) were performed between the collapsed and rostral adjacent vertebrae. In type B fractures with a collapsed caudal endplate, combined monosegment OLIF and PSF were performed between the collapsed and caudal adjacent vertebrae. In type C fractures with severe collapse of both the rostral and caudal endplates, bisegment OLIF and PSF were performed between the rostral and caudal adjacent vertebrae, and pedicle screws were also inserted into the collapsed vertebra. Preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiographical status were reviewed. RESULTS The mean number of fusion segments was 1.6. Walking ability improved in all patients, and the mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for recovery rate was 65.7%. At 1 year postoperatively, the mean preoperative Oswestry Disability Index of 65.6% had significantly improved to 21.1%. The mean local lordotic angle, which was −5.9° preoperatively, was corrected to 10.5° with surgery and was maintained at 7.7° at the final follow-up. The mean corrective angle was 16.4°, and the mean correction loss was 2.8°. CONCLUSIONS The authors have proposed using minimally invasive, short-segment APCS with OLIF, tailored to the morphology of the collapsed vertebra, to treat LSCS-OVC. APCS achieves neural decompression, reconstruction of anterior support, and correction of local alignment.

scholarly journals Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Report of Seven Cases with 12-Month Follow-Up

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jincai Yang ◽  
Chang Liu ◽  
Yong Hai ◽  
Peng Yin ◽  
Lijin Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Bone Trabeculae ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Purpose. The objective of this study was to investigate the preliminary effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PE-TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Methods. From September 2016 to June 2017, a series of seven patients consisting of six females and one male with an average age of 55.25 years (range 43–77 years) who were diagnosed with LSS were involved in this study. All patients were treated by PE-TLIF. During perioperative and follow-up period, demographic data, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified MacNab criteria were evaluated and perioperative complications were documented. Results. All patients were followed up for more than 12 months, with an average follow-up time of 15 (range 12-21) months. The mean VAS of back pain was 7.43 (range 6-8) preoperatively and 0.86 (range 0-2) at the final follow-up. The mean VAS of leg pain was 6.14 (range 4-9) preoperatively and 0.71 (range 0-1) at the final follow-up. The mean ODI was 53.57% (range 38%-63%) preoperatively and 15.57% (range 5%-26%) at the final follow-up. In three-month follow-up, continuous bone trabeculae bridging between intervertebral bodies was seen in 3 cases, and the remaining 4 cases could identify continuous bone trabeculae bridging at 6-month follow-up, reaching the standard of spinal intervertebral fusion. At the final follow-up, 4 patients were rated as excellent (4/7) and 3 patients were rated as good (3/7) according to the modified MacNab criteria. Conclusions. Our study suggested that percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion could acquire satisfactory treatment effects for the patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, even for the patient who could not afford general anesthesia.

scholarly journals Indirect decompression with lateral interbody fusion for severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: minimum 1-year MRI follow-up

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Takayoshi Shimizu ◽  
Shunsuke Fujibayashi ◽  
Bungo Otsuki ◽  
Koichi Murata ◽  
Shuichi Matsuda
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Disc Height ◽  
Decompression Surgery ◽  
Posterior Decompression ◽  
Canal Stenosis ◽  
Indirect Decompression ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Lateral Interbody ◽  
Over Time

OBJECTIVEThe use of indirect decompression surgery for severe canal stenosis remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of lateral interbody fusion (LIF) without posterior decompression in degenerative lumbar spinal spondylosis with severe stenosis on preoperative MRI.METHODSThis is a retrospective case series from a single academic institution. The authors included 42 patients (45 surgical levels) who were preoperatively diagnosed with severe degenerative lumbar stenosis on MRI based on the previously published Schizas classification. These patients underwent LIF with supplemental pedicle screw fixation without posterior decompression. Surgical levels were limited to L3–4 and/or L4–5. All patients satisfied the minimum 1-year MRI follow-up. The authors compared the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the thecal sac and the clinical outcome scores (Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] score) preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at the 1-year follow-up. Fusion status and disc height were evaluated based on CT scans obtained at the 1-year follow-up.RESULTSThe CSA improved over time, increasing from 54.5 ± 19.2 mm2 preoperatively to 84.7 ± 31.8 mm2 at 3 weeks postoperatively and to 132.6 ± 37.5 mm2 at the last follow-up (average 28.3 months) (p < 0.001). The JOA score significantly improved over time (preoperatively 16.1 ± 4.1, 3 months postoperatively 24.4 ± 4.0, and 1-year follow-up 25.7 ± 2.9; p < 0.001). The fusion rate at the 1-year follow-up was 88.8%, and disc heights were significantly restored (preoperative, 6.3 mm and postoperative, 9.6 mm; p < 0.001). Patients showing poor CSA expansion (< 200% expansion rate) at the last follow-up had a higher prevalence of pseudarthrosis than patients with significant CSA expansion (> 200% expansion rate) (25.0% vs 3.4%, p < 0.001). No major perioperative complications were observed.CONCLUSIONSLIF with indirect decompression for degenerative lumbar disease with severe canal stenosis provided successful clinical outcomes, including restoration of disc height and indirect expansion of the thecal sac. Severe canal stenosis diagnosed on preoperative MRI itself is not a contraindication for indirect decompression surgery.

scholarly journals Spino-pelvic sagittal parameters in patients with degenerative thoracolumbar kyphosis combined with lumbar stenosis syndrome

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuai Xu ◽  
Chen Guo ◽  
Yan Liang ◽  
Zhenqi Zhu ◽  
Haiying Liu
Keyword(s):  
Thoracolumbar Kyphosis ◽  
Short Segment ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Pelvic Parameters ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Sagittal Parameters ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Abstract Objective The patients diagnozed degenerative thoracolumbar kyphosis (DTLK) with lumbar spinal syndrome (LSS) were enrolled, to identify the significance of spino-pelvic parameters in this group.Methods An overall 138 (M/F=53/85) patients were enrolled with a mean follow-up of 24.6±11.1 (m). All cases were performed short-segment posterior fusion on LSS region. Radiological parameters were TLK, LL, PI, PT and SVA obtained on the X-ray. Quality of life (QOL) were evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI). Accorrding to age-related formula by Lafage, various thresholds on PI-LL, PT and SVA were determined, ensuing three pairs of normal and abnormal groups were respectively divided into based on these parameters. Results Both VAS and ODI statistically improved (P <0.001). At the endpoint, TLK decreased by a mean of 8.2±8.8° and cases got TLK-correction occupied 40.4%. The whole balance status (normal SVA) was improved compared to baseline (P=0.006), so was the ratio of matched PI-LL (P=0.002), but the ratio of normal PT and larger PT was of no significance (P=0.794). The final balance status was irrelevant to QOL whatever balance status at baseline. However, ODI in PI-LL matched group or in normal PT group were respectively less than that of abnormal groups (P=0.022 and P=0.019).Conclusions The mean TLK decreased even a short-segment fusion purely performed on LSS. QOL was related to PI-LL and PT, but not to SVA in DTLK patients.

scholarly journals Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Results of Mean 46-Month Follow-Up

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Ho Lee ◽  
H. Yener Erken ◽  
Junseok Bae
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Early Postoperative Period ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Spinal Disorders ◽  
Radiological Results ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Clinical And Radiological Results

Background. Spinal fusion has been shown to be the preferred surgical option to reduce pain, recover function, and increase quality of life in the treatment of a variety of lumbar spinal disorders. The main goal of the present study is to report our clinical experience and results of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (PELIF) applications using the expandable spacer in a single institution.Methods. We performed a retrospective review of 18 patients with >12-month follow-up who had been operated on PELIF using expandable spacer from 2001 to 2007. Their clinical and radiological data were collected and analyzed.Results. The mean follow-up period was 46 months. The mean DH before the surgery was 8.3 mm which improved to 11.4 mm at the early postoperative period and regressed to 9.3 mm at the last follow-up visit. The VAS-B, VAS-L, and ODI scores at the last follow-up showed a 54%, 72%, and 69% improvement from the preoperative period, respectively.Conclusions. The presented PELIF technique with the expandable spacer seems to be a promising surgical technique for the treatment of a variety of lumbar spinal disorders. Conversely, radiological results including disc space subsidence make the stand-alone application of the expandable spacer debatable.

Vertebroplasty-augmented short-segment posterior fixation of osteoporotic vertebral collapse with neurological deficit in the thoracolumbar spine: comparisons with posterior surgery without vertebroplasty and anterior surgery

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 612-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenzo Uchida ◽  
Hideaki Nakajima ◽  
Takafumi Yayama ◽  
Tsuyoshi Miyazaki ◽  
Takayuki Hirai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neurological Deficit ◽  
Posterior Fixation ◽  
Vertebral Collapse ◽  
Kyphotic Angle ◽  
Short Segment ◽  
Anterior Surgery ◽  
Posterior Surgery ◽  
Group B ◽  
Osteoporotic Vertebral Collapse

Object The surgical approach and treatment of thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral collapse with neurological deficit have not been documented in detail. Anterior surgery provides good decompression and solid fusion, but the surgery-related risk is relatively higher than that associated with the posterior approach. In posterior surgery, the major problem after posterior correction and instrumentation is failure to support the anterior spinal column, leading to loss of correction of kyphosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of reinforcing short-segment posterior fixation with vertebroplasty and to compare the outcome with those of posterior surgery without vertebroplasty and anterior surgery, retrospectively. Methods The authors studied 83 patients who underwent surgical treatment for a single thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral collapse with neurological deficit. Twenty-eight patients treated by posterior surgery combined with vertebroplasty (Group A), 25 patients treated by posterior surgery without vertebroplasty (Group B), and 30 patients treated by anterior surgery (Group C) were followed up for a mean postoperative period of 4.4 years. Neurological outcome, visual analog scale pain score, and radiographic results were compared in the 3 groups. Results Postoperative (4–6 weeks) and follow-up neurological outcome and visual analog scale scores were not significantly different among the 3 groups. Postoperative kyphotic angle was significantly reduced in Group B compared with Group C (p = 0.007), whereas the kyphotic angle was not significantly different among the 3 groups at follow-up. The mean ± SD loss of correction at follow-up was 4.6° ± 4.5°, 8.6° ± 6.2°, and 4.5° ± 5.9° in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. The correction loss at follow-up in Group B was significantly higher compared with Groups A and C (p = 0.0171 and p = 0.0180, respectively). Conclusions The results suggest that additional reinforcement with vertebroplasty reduces the kyphotic loss and instrumentation failure, compared with patients without the reinforcement of vertebroplasty. Vertebroplasty-augmented short-segment fixation seems to offer immediate spinal stability in patients with thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral collapse; the effect seems equivalent to that of anterior reconstruction.

scholarly journals Stand-Alone Posterior Expandable Cage Technique for Adjacent Segment Degeneration with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: A Retrospective Case Series

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 237
Author(s):  
Woo-Jin Choi ◽  
Seung-Kook Kim ◽  
Manhal Alaraj ◽  
Hyeun-Sung Kim ◽  
Su-Chan Lee
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Balance ◽  
Spinal Canal ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽  
Spinal Canal Stenosis ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis ◽  
Canal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Expandable Cages

Background and Objectives: Symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) is a common complication after spinal intervention, particularly interbody fusion. Stand-alone posterior expandable cages enable interbody fusion with preservation of the previous operation site, and screw-related complications are avoided. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the clinicoradiologic outcomes of stand-alone posterior expandable cages for ASD with LSCS. Materials and Methods: Patients with persistent neurologic symptoms and radiologically confirmed ASD with LSCS were evaluated between January 2011 and December 2016. The five-year follow-up data were used to evaluate the long-term outcomes. The radiologic parameters for sagittal balance, pain control (visual analogue scale), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and early (peri-operative) and late (implant) complications were evaluated. Results: The data of 19 patients with stand-alone posterior expandable cages were evaluated. Local factors, such as intervertebral and foraminal heights, were significantly corrected (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively), and revision was not reported. The pain level (p < 0.01) and disability rate (p < 0.01) significantly improved, and the early complication rate was low (n = 2, 10.52%). However, lumbar lordosis (p = 0.62) and sagittal balance (p = 0.80) did not significantly improve. Furthermore, the rates of subsidence (n = 4, 21.05%) and retropulsion (n = 3, 15.79%) were high. Conclusions: A stand-alone expandable cage technique should only be considered for older adults and patients with previous extensive fusion. Although this technique is less invasive, improves the local radiologic factors, and yields favorable clinical outcomes with low revision rates, it does not improve the sagittal balance. For more widespread application, the strength of the cage material and high subsidence rates should be improved.

Outcomes of 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for 2-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironobu Sakaura ◽  
Tomoya Yamashita ◽  
Toshitada Miwa ◽  
Kenji Ohzono ◽  
Tetsuo Ohwada
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Single Level ◽  
The Mean

Object A systematic review concerning surgical management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) showed that a satisfactory clinical outcome was significantly more likely with adjunctive spinal fusion than with decompression alone. However, the role of adjunctive fusion and the optimal type of fusion remain controversial. Therefore, operative management for multilevel DS raises more complicated issues. The purpose of this retrospective study was to elucidate clinical and radiological outcomes after 2-level PLIF for 2-level DS with the least bias in determination of operative procedure. Methods Since 2005, all patients surgically treated for lumbar DS at the authors' hospital have been treated using posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with pedicle screws, irrespective of severity of slippage, patient age, or bone quality. The authors conducted a retrospective review of 20 consecutive cases involving patients who underwent 2-level PLIF for 2-level DS and had been followed up for 2 years or longer (2-level PLIF group). They also analyzed data from 92 consecutive cases involving patients who underwent single-level PLIF for single-level DS during the same time period and had been followed for at least 2 years (1-level PLIF group). This second group served as a control. Clinical status was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Fusion status and sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine were assessed by comparing serial plain radiographs. Surgery-related complications and the need for additional surgery were evaluated. Results The mean JOA score improved significantly from 12.8 points before surgery to 20.4 points at the latest follow-up in the 2-level PLIF group (mean recovery rate 51.8%), and from 14.2 points preoperatively to 22.5 points at the latest follow-up in the single-level PLIF group (mean recovery rate 55.3%). At the final follow-up, 95.0% of patients in the 2-level PLIF group and 96.7% of those in the 1-level PLIF group had achieved solid spinal fusion, and the mean sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine was more lordotic than before surgery in both groups. Early surgery-related complications, including transient neurological complications, occurred in 6 patients in the 2-level PLIF group (30.0%) and 11 patients in the 1-level PLIF group (12.0%). Symptomatic adjacent-segment disease was found in 4 patients in the 2-level PLIF group (20.0%) and 10 patients in the 1-level PLIF group (10.9%). Conclusions The clinical outcome of 2-level PLIF for 2-level lumbar DS was satisfactory, although surgery-related complications including symptomatic adjacent-segment disease were not negligible.

scholarly journals Outcome of decompressive operative procedure in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis: experience of managing consecutive 25 cases

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-107
Author(s):  
Apel Chandra Saha ◽  
Md Hasan Masud ◽  
Md Abdul Haque ◽  
Mohammad Zulfiqur Haider Sarker
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Canal ◽  
Spinal Canal Stenosis ◽  
City Hospital ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis ◽  
Interventional Study ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Canal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Canal ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Background: Lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) is a common medical disorder due to degenerative changesin the middle age and older individual. In this condition, narrowing of lumbar spinal canal and nerve rootcanal leads to painful, debilitating compression of spinal nerves and blood vessels. Decompressive surgery inlumbar spinal canal stenosis is one of modern methods of treatment.The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of decompressive operative management in degenerativelumbar spinal canal stenosis. Methods: Thiswas a prospective interventional study carried out at National Institute of Traumatology andOrthopaedic Rehabilitation (NITOR) and City Hospital, Lalmatia, Dhaka from October 2012 to December2014.Total number of patients were 25 who underwent decompressive surgical procedures. Each of patientswas evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, disability by using Oswestry disability index (ODI)and ModifiedMacnab Criteria (MMC)for assessment of improvement. Results: This was a prospective interventional study carried out at National Institute Of Traumatology and OrthopaedicRehabilitation (NITOR) and City hospital, Lalmatia, Dhaka from October 2012 to December 2014. Out of 25patients, 19 patients(76%)were male and 6 patients (24%) were female, age ranged from 38-65 years with the meanage 48.50 ± 8.65 years. Sixteen (64%) patients were manual worker and 9 patients (36%) were sedentary worker.Sixteen (64%) patients had multilevel stenosis and 9 patients (36%) had single level stenosis. The mean follow upduration was 1.5 years (range: 1-3 years). Mean estimated blood loss was 150ml (range : 100-200ml), meansurgery time was 130mutes (range: 80-180min) and average hospital stay was 7 days (range: 4-10 days). Only 1patient (4%) had discitis, 1 patient (4%) had superficial wound infection and 1 patient (4%) had dural tear. AsMMC, 21 (84%) patients was poor before operation and after operation at 12 months follow up 8 patients (32%)had excellent, 12 patients (48%) had good, 4 patients (16%) had fair and 1 patient (4%) had poor functionaloutcome. Mean (SD) ODI were 75.40 (± 5.01) before operation and reduced to 8.36 (± 13.54) after operation at 3rd(12 month) follow up. Mean (SD) VAS was 7.12 (± 0.86) before operation and reduced to 1.46 (± 1.31) afteroperation at 3rd (12 month) follow up. Twenty (80%) patients had satisfactory functional outcome. Conclusion: Decompressive operation is an effective, safe and acceptable method of treatment in degenerativelumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS). Birdem Med J 2020; 10(2): 103-107

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document