Efficacy analysis of one-stage posterior-only surgical treatment for thoracic spinal tuberculosis in the T4–6 segments with minimum 5-year follow-up

In recent years, with the in-depth research on spinal tuberculosis, posterior surgery alone has been praised highly by more and more surgeons due to the better correction of kyphosis, better maintenance of spinal physiological curvature, smaller surgical trauma and fewer surgical complications. However, there is currently lack of relevant reports about the efficacy of posterior surgery alone in the treatment of tuberculosis in the T4–6 segments. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical study efficacy and feasibility of one-stage posterior-only surgical treatment for thoracic spinal tuberculosis in the T4–6 segments. 67 patients with tuberculosis in T4–6 segments who underwent one-stage posterior-only surgery were included in this study. The clinical efficacy was evaluated using statistical analysis based on the data about erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), Oswestry Dability Index (ODI) score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and Cobb angle before surgery, after surgery and at the last follow-up. All patients completed fusion during the follow-up period of 6–9 months. ESR and CRP were returned to normal for all patients at 6 months follow-up. In the meanwhile, among the 27 patients combined with neurological impairment, neurological functions of 22 cases (81.48%) recovered completely at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). Cobb angle of the kyphosis was improved from preoperative 34.8 ± 10.9° to postoperative 9.6 ± 2.8°, maintaining at 11.3 ± 3.2° at the last follow-up, The ODI and VAS scores were improved by 77.10% and 81.70%, respectively. This 5-year follow-up study shows that better clinical efficacy can be achieved for tuberculosis in T4–6 segments using one-stage posterior-only approach by costotransverse debridement in combination with bone graft and internal fixation. The posterior surgical method cannot only effectively accomplish debridement, obtain satisfactory clinical results, but also well correct kyphotic deformity and maintain it.

Kyphosis After Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations

Thoracolumbar fractures change the biomechanics of the spine. Load distribution causes kyphosis by the time. Treatment of posttraumatic kyphosis is still controversial. We reviewed the literature between 2010 and 2020 using a search with keywords “thoracolumbar fracture and kyphosis.” We removed osteoporotic fractures, ankylosing spondylitis fractures, non-English language papers, case reports, and low-quality case series. Up-to-date information on posttraumatic kyphosis management was reviewed to reach an agreement in a consensus meeting of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) Spine Committee. The first meeting was conducted in Peshawar in December 2019 with WFNS Spine Committee members’ presence and participation. The second meeting was a virtual meeting via the internet on June 12, 2020. We utilized the Delphi method to administer the questionnaire to preserve a high degree of validity. We summarized 42 papers on posttraumatic kyphosis. Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar kyphosis due to unstable burst fractures can be done via a posterior only approach. Less blood loss and reduced surgery time are the main advantages of posterior surgery. Kyphosis angle for surgical decision and fusion levels are controversial. However, global sagittal balance should be taken into consideration for the segment that has to be included. Adding an intermediate screw at the fractured level strengthens the construct.

P.221 Frailty is an Important Predictor of 30-day Morbidity in Patients Treated for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Using a Posterior Surgical Approach

Background: A non-operative approach has been favoured for elderly patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis due to a perceived higher risk with surgery. However, most studies have used an arbitrary age cut-off to define “elderly.” We hypothesized that frailty is an independent predictor of morbidity after surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for years 2010 to 2018 was used. Patients who received posterior lumbar spine decompression with or without posterior fusion instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were included. The primary outcome was major complication. Secondary outcomes were readmission, reoperation, and discharge to location other than home. Logistic regression analysis was done to investigate the association between outcomes and frailty. Results: There were 15 658 patients in this study. The mean age was 62.5 years (SD 12.2). Frailty, as measured by the Modified Frailty Index-5 was significantly associated with increased risk of major complication, unplanned readmission, reoperation, and non-home discharge. Increasing frailty was associated with increasing risk of morbidity. Conclusions: Frailty is independently associated with higher risk of morbidity after posterior surgery in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. These data are of significance to clinicians in planning treatment for these patients.

Risk Factors and Management Strategies of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage Following Lumbar Posterior Surgery

Objective: To analyze the risk factors of cerebrospinal fluid leakage(CSFL) following lumbar posterior surgery and summarize the related management strategies. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 3179 patients with CSFL strategies lumbar posterior surgery in our hospital from January 2019 to December 2020. There were 807 cases of lumbar disc hemiation(LDH), 1143 cases of lumbar spinal stenosi (LSS), 1122 cases of lumbar spondylolisthesis(LS), 93 cases of lumbar degenerative scoliosis(LDS),14 cases of lumbar spinal benign tumor(LST). Data of gender, age, body mass index(BMI), duration of disease, diabete,smoking history, preoperative epidural hormone injection, number of surgical levels, surgical methods (total laminar decompression, fenestration decompression), revision surgery, extubation time, suture removal time, and complications were recorded.Results: The incidence of 115 cases with cerebrospinal fluid leakage,was 3.62% (115/3179).One-way ANOVA showed that gender, body mass index(BMI), smoking history, combined with type 2 diabetes and surgical method had no significant effect on CSFL(P >0.05). Age, type of disease, duration of disease, preoperative epidural hormone injection, number of surgical levels and revision surgery had effects on CSFL(P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that type of disease, preoperative epidural hormone injection, number of surgical levels and revision surgery were significantly affected CSFL(P<0.05), and duration of disease and age of the patients were not significantly affected CSFL (P >0.05).The extubation time of CSFL patients ranged from 7 to 11 days, with an average of 7.11±0.48 days, the extubation time of patients without CSFL was 1-3 days, with an average of 2.02±0.13 days, and there was a statistical difference between the two groups(P < 0.05).The removal time of CSFL patients was 12-14 days, with an average of 13.11±2.67 days, and the removal time of patients without CSFL was 10-14 days, with an average of 12.87±2.19 days, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Type of disease, preoperative epidural hormone injection, number of surgical levels and revision surgery were the risk factors for CSFL. Effective prevention were the key to CSFL in lumbar surgery.Once appear, CSFL can also be effectively dealt with without obvious adverse reactions after intraoperative effectively repair dural, head down, adequate drainage after operation, the high position, rehydration treatment, and other treatments.

Anterior instrumentation surgery for the treatment of Lenke type 1AR curve patterns

OBJECTIVE Previous studies have demonstrated that Lenke lumbar modifier A contains 2 distinct types (AR and AL), and the AR curve pattern is likely to develop adding-on (i.e., a progressive increase in the number of vertebrae included within the primary curve distally after posterior surgery). However, the results of anterior surgery are unknown. The purpose of this study was to present the surgical results in a cohort of patients undergoing scoliosis treatment for type 1AR curves and to compare anterior and posterior surgeries to consider the ideal indications and advantages of anterior surgery for type 1AR curves. METHODS Patients with a Lenke type 1 or 2 and lumbar modifier AR (L4 vertebral tilt to the right) and a minimum 2-year postoperative follow-up were included. The incidence of adding-on and radiographic data were compared between the anterior and posterior surgery groups. The numbers of levels between the end, stable, neutral, and last touching vertebra to the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) were also evaluated. RESULTS Forty-four patients with a mean follow-up of 57 months were included. There were 14 patients in the anterior group and 30 patients in the posterior group. The main thoracic Cobb angle was not significantly different between the groups preoperatively and at final follow-up. At final follow-up, the anterior group had significantly less tilting of the LIV than the posterior group (−0.8° ± 4.5° vs 3° ± 4°). Distal adding-on was observed in no patient in the anterior group and in 6 patients in the posterior group at final follow-up (p = 0.025). In the anterior group, no LIV was set below the end vertebra, and all LIVs were set above last touching vertebra. The LIV was significantly more proximal in the anterior group than in the posterior surgery patients without adding-on for all reference vertebrae (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to investigate the surgical results of anterior surgery for Lenke type 1AR curve patterns, and it showed that anterior surgery for the curves could minimize the distal extent of the instrumented fusion without adding-on. This would leave more mobile disc space below the fusion.

Efficacy Analysis of One-stage Posterior-only Surgical Treatment for Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis in the T4-6 Segments with Minimum 5-year Follow-up

In recent years, with the in-depth research on spinal tuberculosis, posterior surgery alone has been praised highly by more and more surgeons due to the better correction of kyphosis, better maintenance of spinal physiological curvature, smaller surgical trauma and fewer surgical complications. However, there is currently lack of relevant reports about the efficacy of posterior surgery alone in the treatment of tuberculosis in the T4-6 segments. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical study efficacy and feasibility of one-stage posterior-only surgical treatment for thoracic spinal tuberculosis in the T4-6 segments. 67 patients with tuberculosis in T4-6 segments who underwent one-stage posterior-only surgery were included in this study. The clinical efficacy was evaluated using statistical analysis based on the data about erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), Oswestry Dability Index (ODI) score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and Cobb angle before surgery, after surgery and at the last follow-up. All patients completed fusion during the follow-up period of 6–9 months. ESR and CRP were returned to normal for all patients at 6 months follow-up. In the meanwhile, among the 27 patients combined with neurological impairment, neurological functions of 22 cases (81.48%) recovered completely at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). Cobb angle of the kyphosis was improved from preoperative 34.8 ± 10.9° to postoperative 9.6 ± 2.8°, maintaining at 11.3 ± 3.2° at the last follow-up, The ODI and VAS scores were improved by 77.10% and 81.70%, respectively. This 5-year follow-up study shows that better clinical efficacy can be achieved for tuberculosis in T4-6 segments using one-stage posterior-only approach by costotransverse debridement in combination with bone graft and internal fixation. The posterior surgical method cannot only effectively accomplish debridement, obtain satisfactory clinical results, but also well correct kyphotic deformity and maintain it.

Odontoid Resorption After Posterior Occipitocervical Fusion in Rheumatoid Basilar Invagination

Background Context: Inflammatory arthritis of the cervical spine is common and begins early after the onset of rheumatoid arthritis. Atlantoaxial instability is the most common pattern followed by cranial settling or basilar invagination, with subaxial subluxation being least common. Vertical migration of the odontoid (basilar invagination) poses an increased risk of sudden death from compression of the brain stem. A combination of transoral decompression and posterior occipitocervical fusion has been described, although a single posterior approach stabilization may suffice and avoid the associated comorbidities with an anterior/posterior surgery in a high-risk rheumatoid patient. Purpose: To report a case of odontoid resorption and cervicomedullary angle improvement after occipitocervical fusion. Study Design: A retrospective case report. Methods: Radiographic analysis. Results: After posterior occipitocervical fusion alone for basilar invagination there was a reduction of cervicomedullary angle to 127 degrees at 3 years follow up. This was improved from an initial 115 degrees through odontoid remodeling. Conclusions: Basilar invagination treated with posterior alone occipitocervical stabilization may suffice in providing stability and long term decompression of the cervicomedullary junction through resorption and remodeling of the odontoid. This case study supports the viability of avoiding a transoral resection for an irreducible severely migrated odontoid.

Upper Cervical Spine Fracture-Dislocation in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis: Application of Halo Vest Before and During Posterior Surgery

Background It is a challenge to reduce and immobilize the broken “bamboo spine”, especially for the upper cervical spine, in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) before and during posterior surgery. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the case histories, operations, neurologic outcomes, follow-up data, and imaging records of 17 patients with AS and upper cervical spine fracture-dislocation who underwent surgical treatment in three clinical spine center from 2010 to 2019. A halo vest was used to reduce and immobilize fractured spinal column ends. The neurological injury was evaluated using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale score and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score before and after operation. Complications and time of bone fusion were recorded. Results Fourteen patients achieved closed anatomical reduction after halo vest application. No displacement in fracture ends and loss of reduction occurred after prone position. No patient presented with secondary neurological deterioration. All patients was performed posterior surgery. The surgery improved the ASIA grade in all patients (P < 0.001). The mean JOA score also increased significantly at last follow-up compared to preoperation (14.5 ± 2.3 vs. 9.2 ± 2.4, P < 0.01). No severe complication and death occurred. All patients reached solid bony fusion at 12-month follow-up. Conclusions Use of a halo vest before and during the operation is safe and effective in patients with AS who develop upper cervical spine fracture-dislocation. This technique makes positioning, awake nasoendotracheal intubation, nursing, and the operation more convenient. It can also provide satisfactory reduction and rigid immobilization and prevent secondary neurologic deterioration. .