scholarly journals Outcomes following surgical management of vagus nerve stimulator–related infection: a retrospective multi-institutional study

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Hirotaka Hasegawa ◽  
Jamie J. Van Gompel ◽  
W. Richard Marsh ◽  
Robert E. Wharen ◽  
Richard S. Zimmerman ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVESurgical site infection (SSI) is a rare but significant complication after vagus nerve stimulator (VNS) placement. Treatment options range from antibiotic therapy alone to hardware removal. The optimal therapeutic strategy remains open to debate. Therefore, the authors conducted this retrospective multicenter analysis to provide insight into the optimal management of VNS-related SSI (VNS-SSI).METHODSUnder institutional review board approval and utilizing an institutional database with 641 patients who had undergone 808 VNS-related placement surgeries and 31 patients who had undergone VNS-related hardware removal surgeries, the authors retrospectively analyzed VNS-SSI.RESULTSSixteen cases of VNS-SSI were identified; 12 of them had undergone the original VNS placement procedure at the authors’ institutions. Thus, the incidence of VNS-SSI was calculated as 1.5%. The mean (± standard deviation) time from the most recent VNS-related surgeries to infection was 42 (± 27) days. Methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus was the usual causative bacteria (58%). Initial treatments included antibiotics with or without nonsurgical procedures (n = 6), nonremoval open surgeries for irrigation (n = 3), generator removal (n = 3), and total or near-total removal of hardware (n = 4). Although 2 patients were successfully treated with antibiotics alone or combined with generator removal, removal of both the generator and leads was eventually required in 14 patients. Mild swallowing difficulties and hoarseness occurred in 2 patients with eventual resolution.CONCLUSIONSRemoval of the VNS including electrode leads combined with antibiotic administration is the definitive treatment but has a risk of causing dysphagia. If the surgeon finds dense scarring around the vagus nerve, the prudent approach is to snip the electrode close to the nerve as opposed to attempting to unwind the lead completely.

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 110193
Author(s):  
Arthur Chyan ◽  
Sangeeta Kumaraswami ◽  
Suryanarayana Pothula

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 83-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandi Lam ◽  
Yimo Lin ◽  
Daniel J. Curry ◽  
Gaddum D. Reddy ◽  
Peter C. Warnke

2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 383-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoaki Tanaka ◽  
Elizabeth A. Thiele ◽  
Joseph R. Madsen ◽  
Blaise F. Bourgeois ◽  
Steven M. Stufflebeam

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hinaesh Upadhyay ◽  
Sushanth Bhat ◽  
Divya Gupta ◽  
Martha Mulvey ◽  
Sue Ming

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Will P. Rodgers ◽  
Andrew J. Durnford ◽  
Fenella J. Kirkham ◽  
Andrea Whitney ◽  
Mark A. Mullee ◽  
...  

Object Interrater reliability as measured by the kappa (κ) statistic is a widely used and valuable tool to measure the robustness of a scoring system. Seizure frequency reduction is a central outcome measure following vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). A specific VNS scoring system has been proposed by McHugh, but its interrater reliability has not been tested. The authors assessed its interrater reliability and compared it with that of the Engel and International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) systems. Methods Using the Engel, ILAE, and McHugh scoring systems, 3 observers independently rated the medical records of children who had undergone vagus nerve stimulator implantation between January 2001 and April 2011 at the Southampton University Hospital. The interrater agreements were then calculated using the κ statistic. Results Interrater reliability for the McHugh scale (κ0.693) was very good and was superior to those of the Engel (κ0.464) and ILAE (κ0.491) systems for assessing outcome in patients undergoing VNS. Conclusions The authors recommend considering the McHugh scoring system when assessing outcomes following VNS.


2022 ◽  
pp. 373-375
Author(s):  
John M. Stern ◽  
Noriko Salamon

Author(s):  
Christopher M. Carosella ◽  
David F. Smith ◽  
Kathleen M. Sarber ◽  
Michele Turner ◽  
Thomas J. Dye

AbstractVagus nerve stimulator (VNS)-associated sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is a poorly understood side effect of VNS treatment. We present a patient with VNS-associated SDB who underwent sleep laboratory VNS titration, evaluation by drug-induced sleep endoscopy, and treatment including adenotonsillectomy and positive airway pressure therapy. This case is unique as it is the first to document, in real time, the inverse correlation of VNS current with airflow. This case offers unique insights into mechanisms and treatment of VNS-associated SDB, and a novel approach in its management. Most importantly, this case highlights the need for collaboration between physicians managing epilepsy with VNS and those managing sleep.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document