Transforaminal 360° lumbar endoscopic foraminotomy in postfusion patients: technical note and case series

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Albert E. Telfeian ◽  
Ashwin Veeramani ◽  
Andrew S Zhang ◽  
Matthew S. Quinn ◽  
Alan H. Daniels
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Visual Analog Scale Score ◽  
Technical Note ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Decompression Surgery ◽  
Foraminal Stenosis

OBJECTIVE This report describes a minimally invasive lumbar foraminotomy technique that can be applied in patients who underwent complex spine decompression procedures or in patients with severe foraminal stenosis. METHODS Awake, endoscopic decompression surgery was performed in 538 patients over a 5-year period between 2014 and 2019. Transforaminal endoscopic foraminal decompression surgery using a high-speed endoscopic drill was performed in 34 patients who had previously undergone fusions at the treated level. RESULTS At 2-year follow-up, the mean (± SD) preoperative visual analog scale score for leg pain and the Oswestry Disability Index improved from 7.1 (± 1.5) and 40.1% (± 12.1%) to 2.1 (± 1.9) and 13.6% (± 11.1%). CONCLUSIONS A minimally invasive, awake procedure is presented for the treatment of severe lumbar foraminal stenosis in patients with lumbar radiculopathy after lumbar fusion.

scholarly journals Return to Golf After Lumbar Fusion

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 280-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant D. Shifflett ◽  
Michael D. Hellman ◽  
Philip K. Louie ◽  
Christopher Mikhail ◽  
Kevin U. Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Fusion Surgery ◽  
Telephone Contact ◽  
Spinal Fusion Surgery ◽  
Lumbar Fusion Surgery

Background: Spinal fusion surgery is being increasingly performed, yet few studies have focused on return to recreational sports after lumbar fusion and none have specifically analyzed return to golf. Hypothesis: Most golfers successfully return to sport after lumbar fusion surgery. Study Design: Case series. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Methods: All patients who underwent 1- or 2-level primary lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative pathologies performed by a single surgeon between January 2008 and October 2012 and had at least 1-year follow-up were included. Patients completed a specifically designed golf survey. Surveys were mailed, given during follow-up clinic, or answered during telephone contact. Results: A total of 353 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with 200 responses (57%) to the questionnaire producing 34 golfers. The average age of golfers was 57 years (range, 32-79 years). In 79% of golfers, preoperative back and/or leg pain significantly affected their ability to play golf. Within 1 year from surgery, 65% of patients returned to practice and 52% returned to course play. Only 29% of patients stated that continued back/leg pain limited their play. Twenty-five patients (77%) were able to play the same amount of golf or more than before fusion surgery. Of those providing handicaps, 12 (80%) reported the same or an improved handicap. Conclusion: More than 50% of golfers return to on-course play within 1 year of lumbar fusion surgery. The majority of golfers can return to preoperative levels in terms of performance (handicap) and frequency of play. Clinical Relevance: This investigation offers insight into when golfers return to sport after lumbar fusion surgery and provides surgeons with information to set realistic expectations postoperatively.

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Lumbar Decompression Surgery: A Review of 2699 Cases

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256821989654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geraint Sunderland ◽  
Mitchell Foster ◽  
Sujay Dheerendra ◽  
Robin Pillay
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Lumbar Spine Surgery ◽  
Decompression Surgery ◽  
Lumbar Decompression ◽  
Patient Reported

Study Design: Retrospective case series. Objective: Despite numerous advances in the technology and techniques available to spinal surgeons, lumbar decompression remains the mainstay of degenerative lumbar spine surgery. It has proven efficacy in trials, but only limited evidence of advantage over conservative management in large scale systematic reviews. We collated data from a large surgically managed cohort to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively populated database. Patient demographics, surgical details, and patient outcomes (Spine Tango core outcome measures index [COMI]–Low Back) were collected for 2699 lumbar decompression surgeries. Results: Lumbar decompression was shown to be successful at improving leg pain (mean improvement in visual analogue scale [VAS] at 3 months = 4) and to a lesser extent, back pain (mean improvement in VAS at 3 months = 2.61). Mean improvement in COMI score was 3.15 for all-comers. Minimal clinically important improvement (MCID) in COMI score (−2 points) was achieved in 73% of patients by 2-year follow-up. Primary surgery was more effective than redo surgery: odds ratio 0.547 (95% CI 0.408-0.733, P < .001). The benefits across all outcomes were maintained for the 2-year follow-up period. Patients can be classified according to their outcome as “early responders”; achieving MCID by 3 months (61% primary vs 41% redo), “late responders”; achieving MCID by 2 years (15% vs 20%) or nonresponders (24% vs 39%). Conclusions: Lumbar decompression is effective in improving quality of life in appropriately selected patients. Patient-reported outcome measures collected routinely and collated within a registry are a powerful tool for assessing the efficacy of lumbar spine interventions and allow accurate counseling of patients perioperatively.

Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Disease with Rheumatoid Arthritis

2019 ◽  
Vol 80 (03) ◽  
pp. 162-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kutbuddin Akbary ◽  
Javier Quillo-Olvera ◽  
Guang-Xun Lin ◽  
Hyun-Jin Jo ◽  
Jin-Sung Kim
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Purpose of Study Standard treatment protocols for lumbar degenerative lesions in the setting of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion (MI-OLIF) in RA patients having degenerative lumbar spine lesions. Methods This was a retrospective hospital-based case series (evidence level 4). Eight patients with degenerative lumbar disease with significant back pain and neurologic claudication underwent MI-OLIFwith polyetheretherketone cage insertion and posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. The clinical outcomes were measured by the numerical rating scale (NRS) for back and leg pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and radiologic outcomes were studied on radiographs, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Minimum follow-up duration was 1 year. Results Mean NRS results for back and leg pain preoperatively were 6.3 and 7.1 that improved to 2.6 and 2 for back and leg pain, respectively, at last follow-up. The mean ODI scores preoperatively were 58.02 that improved to 39.06 at last follow-up. All patients had good functional outcomes, good fusion rates, and were able to continue their activities of daily living without much disability at last follow-up. Conclusion MI-OLIF in patients with symptomatic lumbar spine degenerative lesions with RA seems to provide good short-term clinical and radiologic outcomes.

scholarly journals Fully endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion using a percutaneous unilateral biportal endoscopic technique: technical note and preliminary clinical results

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. E8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Hwa Heo ◽  
Sang Kyu Son ◽  
Jin Hwa Eum ◽  
Choon Keun Park
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Technical Note ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Fusion Surgery ◽  
Lumbar Fusion Surgery ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

OBJECTIVEMinimally invasive spine surgery can minimize damage to normal anatomical structures. Recently, fully endoscopic spine surgeries have been attempted for lumbar fusion surgery. In this study, the authors performed a percutaneous unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique as a minimally invasive surgery for lumbar fusion. The purpose of this study is to present the UBE technique of fully endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) and to analyze the clinical results.METHODSPatients who were to undergo single-level fusion surgery from L3–4 to L5–S1 were enrolled. Two channels (endoscopic portal and working portal) were used for endoscopic lumbar fusion surgery. All patients underwent follow-up for more than 12 months. Demographic characteristics, diagnosis, operative time, and estimated blood loss were evaluated. MRI was performed on postoperative Day 2. Clinical evaluations (visual analog scale [VAS] for the leg and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] scores) were performed preoperatively and during the follow-up period.RESULTSA total of 69 patients (24 men and 45 women) were enrolled in this study. The mean follow-up period was 13.5 months. Postoperative MRI revealed optimal direct neural decompression after fully endoscopic fusion surgery. VAS and ODI scores significantly improved after the surgery. There was no postoperative neurological deterioration.CONCLUSIONSFully endoscopic LIF using the UBE technique may represent an alternative minimally invasive LIF surgery for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. Long-term follow-up and larger clinical studies are needed to validate the clinical and radiological results of this surgery.

scholarly journals Minimally invasive versus open lumbar spinal fusion: a matched study investigating patient-reported and surgical outcomes

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
James Mooney ◽  
Giorgos D. Michalopoulos ◽  
Mohammed Ali Alvi ◽  
Daniel Zeitouni ◽  
Andrew K. Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Spinal Fusion ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Fusion ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Incidental Durotomy

OBJECTIVE With the expanding indications for and increasing popularity of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for lumbar spinal fusion, large-scale outcomes analysis to compare MIS approaches with open procedures is warranted. METHODS The authors queried the Quality Outcomes Database for patients who underwent elective lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease. They performed optimal matching, at a 1:2 ratio between patients who underwent MIS and those who underwent open lumbar fusion, to create two highly homogeneous groups in terms of 33 baseline variables (including demographic characteristics, comorbidities, symptoms, patient-reported scores, indications, and operative details). The outcomes of interest were overall satisfaction, decrease in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and back and leg pain, as well as hospital length of stay (LOS), operative time, reoperations, and incidental durotomy rate. Satisfaction was defined as a score of 1 or 2 on the North American Spine Society scale. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in ODI was defined as ≥ 30% decrease from baseline. Outcomes were assessed at the 3- and 12-month follow-up evaluations. RESULTS After the groups were matched, the MIS and open groups consisted of 1483 and 2966 patients, respectively. Patients who underwent MIS fusion had higher odds of satisfaction at 3 months (OR 1.4, p = 0.004); no difference was demonstrated at 12 months (OR 1.04, p = 0.67). Lumbar stenosis, single-level fusion, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System grade, and absence of spondylolisthesis were most prominently associated with higher odds of satisfaction with MIS compared with open surgery. Patients in the MIS group had slightly lower ODI scores at 3 months (mean difference 1.61, p = 0.006; MCID OR 1.14, p = 0.0495) and 12 months (mean difference 2.35, p < 0.001; MCID OR 1.29, p < 0.001). MIS was also associated with a greater decrease in leg and back pain at both follow-up time points. The two groups did not differ in operative time and incidental durotomy rate; however, LOS was shorter for the MIS group. Revision surgery at 12 months was less likely for patients who underwent MIS (4.1% vs 5.6%, p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS In patients who underwent lumbar fusion for degenerative spinal disease, MIS was associated with higher odds of satisfaction at 3 months postoperatively. No difference was demonstrated at the 12-month follow-up. MIS maintained a small, yet consistent, superiority in decreasing ODI and back and leg pain, and MIS was associated with a lower reoperation rate.

Total uncinectomy of the cervical spine with an osteotome: technical note and intraoperative video

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 831-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand H. Segar ◽  
Alexander Riccio ◽  
Michael Smith ◽  
Themistocles S. Protopsaltis
Keyword(s):  
Vertebral Artery ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Thermal Injury ◽  
Technical Note ◽  
Uncinate Process ◽  
Foraminal Stenosis ◽  
Cervical Kyphosis ◽  
Kyphosis Correction ◽  
Direct Injury ◽  
High Speed Burr

Total uncinate process resection or uncinectomy is often required in the setting of severe foraminal stenosis or cervical kyphosis correction. The proximity of the uncus to the vertebral artery, nerve root, and spinal cord makes this a challenging undertaking. Use of a high-speed burr or ultrasonic bone dissector can be associated with direct injury to the vertebral artery and thermal injury to the surrounding structures. The use of an osteotome is a safe and efficient method of uncinectomy. Here the authors describe their technique, which is illustrated with an intraoperative video.

scholarly journals Minimally invasive spinopelvic “crab-shaped fixation” for unstable pelvic ring fractures: technical note and 16 case series

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akinori Okuda ◽  
Naoki Maegawa ◽  
Hiroaki Matsumori ◽  
Tomohiko Kura ◽  
Yasushi Mizutani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Pelvic Ring ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Technical Note ◽  
Pelvic Ring Fractures

scholarly journals Efficacy of threading lasso fixation in repairing partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion lesions: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun-Yu Chen ◽  
Zhan-Hao Xiao ◽  
Jian-Kun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Visual Analog Scale Score ◽  
Supraspinatus Tendon ◽  
Fixation Technique ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tendon Avulsion

Abstract Background The partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion (PASTA) lesion repair remains a topic of debate. We have performed in situ repair of PASTA lesions using a potentially viable threading lasso fixation technique. This retrospective case series aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of PASTA lesion repair using threading lasso fixation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to review this technique and its outcomes in terms of pain and upper extremity function. Methods Twenty-five patients with PASTA lesions who were treated with threading lasso fixation were reviewed. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Preoperative and follow-up data were retrospectively collected and reviewed. Clinical outcomes were assessed to evaluate the efficacy of the surgery. Results There were no postoperative complications. The average follow-up period was 25.7 (22–27) months. At the last follow-up, all patients underwent follow-up magnetic resonance imaging; only two cases showed a partially healed tendon and no case converted to full-thickness tear. Furthermore, shoulder pain decreased and mobility was recovered, with statistically significant differences in all scoring measures. Specifically, the mean visual analog scale score decreased from 5.4 ± 1.2 before surgery to 1.1 ± 0.8 at the last follow-up (t = 14.908, P < 0.01), and the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Assessment Form score improved significantly from 51.6 ± 6.4 to 89.3 ± 5.2 (t = 22.859, P < 0.01). Additionally, the mean University of California Los Angeles score improved from 17.8 ± 3.5 preoperatively to 32.3 ± 1.4 (t = 19.233, P < 0.01). Conclusions Arthroscopic repair using threading lasso fixation is a novel transtendinous technique for patients with partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion. Tendon integrity is preserved with this method, which may result in improved function. Overall, threading lasso fixation technique is an effective treatment.

Single-position prone lateral transpsoas approach: early experience and outcomes

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
S. Harrison Farber ◽  
Komal Naeem ◽  
Malika Bhargava ◽  
Randall W. Porter
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Consecutive Case ◽  
Intraoperative Radiation ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Transpsoas Approach ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Level Fusion

OBJECTIVE Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) via a transpsoas approach is a workhorse minimally invasive approach for lumbar arthrodesis that is often combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation. There has been increasing interest in performing single-position surgery, allowing access to the anterolateral and posterior spine without requiring patient repositioning. The feasibility of the transpsoas approach in patients in the prone position has been reported. Herein, the authors present a consecutive case series of all patients who underwent single-position prone transpsoas LLIF performed by an individual surgeon since adopting this approach. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of a consecutive case series of adult patients (≥ 18 years old) who underwent single-position prone LLIF for any indication between October 2019 and November 2020. Pertinent operative details (levels, cage use, surgery duration, estimated blood loss, complications) and 3-month clinical outcomes were recorded. Intraoperative and 3-month postoperative radiographs were reviewed to assess for interbody subsidence. RESULTS Twenty-eight of 29 patients (97%) underwent successful treatment with the prone lateral approach over the study interval; the approach was aborted in 1 patient, whose data were excluded. The mean (SD) age of patients was 67.9 (9.3) years; 75% (21) were women. Thirty-nine levels were treated: 18 patients (64%) had single-level fusion, 9 (32%) had 2-level fusion, and 1 (4%) had 3-level fusion. The most commonly treated levels were L3–4 (n = 15), L2–3 (n = 12), and L4–5 (n = 11). L1–2 was fused in 1 patient. The mean operative time was 286.5 (100.6) minutes, and the mean retractor time was 29.2 (13.5) minutes per level. The mean fluoroscopy duration was 215.5 (99.6) seconds, and the mean intraoperative radiation dose was 170.1 (94.8) mGy. Intraoperative subsidence was noted in 1 patient (4% of patients, 3% of levels). Intraoperative lateral access complications occurred in 11% of patients (1 cage repositioning, 2 inadvertent ruptures of anterior longitudinal ligament). Subsidence occurred in 5 of 22 patients (23%) with radiographic follow-up, affecting 6 of 33 levels (18%). Postoperative functional testing (Oswestry Disability Index, SF-36, visual analog scale–back and leg pain) identified significant improvement. CONCLUSIONS This single-surgeon consecutive case series demonstrates that this novel technique is well tolerated and has acceptable clinical and radiographic outcomes. Larger patient series with longer follow-up are needed to further elucidate the safety profile and long-term outcomes of single-position prone LLIF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document