The influence of social determinants of health on single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion outcomes

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Postoperative Complication ◽  
Social Determinants Of Health ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Determinants Of Health ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Single Level

OBJECTIVE Methods of reducing complications in individuals electing to undergo anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) rely upon understanding at-risk patient populations, among other factors. This study aims to investigate the interplay between social determinants of health (SDOH) and postoperative complication rates, length of stay, revision surgery, and rates of postoperative readmission at 30 and 90 days in individuals electing to have single-level ACDF. METHODS Using MARINER30, a database that contains claims information from all payers, patients were identified who underwent single-level ACDF between 2010 and 2019. Identification of patients experiencing disparities in 1 of 6 categories of SDOH was completed using ICD-9 and ICD-10 (International Classifications of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions) codes. The population was propensity matched into 2 cohorts based on comorbidity status: those with SDOH versus those without. RESULTS A total of 10,030 patients were analyzed; there were 5015 (50.0%) in each cohort. The rates of any postoperative complication (12.0% vs 4.6%, p < 0.001); pseudarthrosis (3.4% vs 2.6%, p = 0.017); instrumentation removal (1.8% vs 1.2%, p = 0.033); length of stay (2.54 ± 5.9 days vs 2.08 ± 5.07 days, p < 0.001 [mean ± SD]); and revision surgery (9.7% vs 4.2%, p < 0.001) were higher in the SDOH group compared to patients without SDOH, respectively. Patients with any SDOH had higher odds of perioperative complications (OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.43–3.33), pseudarthrosis (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.06–1.68), revision surgery (OR 2.4, 95% CI 2.04–2.85), and instrumentation removal (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.04–2.00). CONCLUSIONS In patients who underwent single-level ACDF, there is an association between SDOH and higher complication rates, longer stay, increased need for instrumentation removal, and likelihood of revision surgery.

scholarly journals Structural Allograft Versus Synthetic Interbody Cage for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Comparison of 1-Year Outcomes From a National Database

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822094221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nandakumar Menon ◽  
Justin Turcotte ◽  
Chad Patton
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Research Network ◽  
National Database ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Single Level ◽  
Structural Allograft ◽  
Implant Selection

Study Design: Observational cohort study. Objective: To compare 1-year perioperative complications between structural allograft (SA) and synthetic cage (SC) for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a national database. Methods: The TriNetX Research Network was retrospectively queried. Patients undergoing initial single or multilevel ACDF surgery between October 1, 2015 and April 30, 2019 were propensity score matched based on age and comorbidities. The rates of 1-year revision ACDF surgery and reported diagnoses of pseudoarthrosis, surgical site infection (SSI), and dysphagia were compared between structural allograft and synthetic cage techniques. Results: A comparison of 1-year outcomes between propensity score matched cohorts was conducted on 3056 patients undergoing single-level ACDF and 3510 patients undergoing multilevel ACDF. In single-level ACDF patients, there was no difference in 1-year revision ACDF surgery ( P = .573), reported diagnoses of pseudoarthrosis ( P = .413), SSI ( P = .620), or dysphagia ( P = .529) between SA and SC groups. In multilevel ACDF patients, there was a higher rate of revision surgery (SA 3.8% vs SC 7.3%, odds ratio = 1.982, P < .001) in the SC group, and a higher rate of dysphagia in the SA group (SA 15.9% vs SC 12.9%). Conclusion: While the overall revision and complication rate for single-level ACDF remains low despite interbody graft selection, SC implant selection may result in higher rates of revision surgery in multilevel procedures despite yielding lower rates of dysphagia. Further prospective study is warranted.

scholarly journals 516: SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH IMPACT HOSPITAL LENGTH OF STAY FOR CHILDREN WITH SEVERE SEPSIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 249-249
Author(s):  
Alina West ◽  
Hunter Hamilton ◽  
Nariman Ammar ◽  
Fatma Gunturkun ◽  
Tamekia Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Social Determinants Of Health ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Determinants Of Health ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay

Leveraging social determinants of health to reduce hospital length of stay: A pilot quality improvement project to address inpatient cancer patients' barriers during the COVID 19 pandemic.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 233-233
Author(s):  
Sailaja Kamaraju ◽  
Dave Atkinson ◽  
Thomas Wetzel ◽  
Tamiah Wright ◽  
John A. Charlson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Social Determinants Of Health ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Determinants Of Health ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Discharge Process ◽  
Oncology Patients

233 Background: Prior reports from our institution demonstrated high rates of racial segregation, unfavorable social determinants of health (SDoH) in Milwaukee, WI, and statewide reports of inferior outcomes for cancer patients from minority communities. At the Medical College of Wisconsin's Cancer Center (Milwaukee, WI), during the first through last quarters of 2018-2019, cancer patients from the low socioeconomic status (SES) communities who were hospitalized to inpatient oncology units had an average length of stay (LOS) of 7.2 days compared to 5.6 days for high SES group. Under the auspices of the American Society of Clinical Oncology's Quality Training Program (QTP) initiative, we aimed to reduce the hospital LOS by 10% or less by May 2021 for inpatient oncology teams. Methods: A multidisciplinary team collaboration between the inpatient and outpatient providers was developed during this QI initiative. We examined LOS index data, payer types, and other diagnostic criteria for the oncology inpatient solid tumor service and two comparator services (bone marrow transplant, BMT; internal medicine). We generated workflow, a cause-and-effect diagram, and a Pareto diagram to determine the relevant factors associated with longer hospital LOS. Institution-wide implementation of the SDH screen project was launched to evaluate and address specific barriers to SDoH to expedite a safe discharge process during the pandemic. Results: Through one test of change (Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles 1, 2 &3), we identified the problem of extended LOS and patient-related barriers to discharge during this QI initiative. Compared to the baseline LOS, after the launch of the SDoH screen project, there was a 6.5% decrease in the inpatient average LOS for oncology patients (7.89 to 7.40days, p = 0.004),10.7% for BMT (15.96 days to14.26, p = 0.166), and 2.4% for Internal Medicine (4.61 to 4.50 to days, p = 0.131). There was a 10.0% decrease in LOS (8.07 to 7.26 days, p = < 0.001) for the three specialties combined. With collaboration from inpatient and outpatient providers, appropriate referrals were generated to address patient-specific SDH before discharge (i.e., transportation coordination, nutritional and physical therapy referrals, social worker assistance with food, and housing insecurities). Conclusions: In this pilot project, implementing SDoH screening-based-care delivery at the time of inpatient admission demonstrated a slight improvement in LOS for solid tumor oncology patients and provided timely referrals, opportunities to engage and explore the discharge facilities early on during the COVID 19 pandemic. With this preliminary data, we plan to continue to expand our efforts through a systemwide implementation of this SDoH survey both in the inpatient and outpatient settings to address cancer inequities.

scholarly journals Retrospective single-surgeon study of 1123 consecutive cases of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a comparison of clinical outcome parameters, complication rates, and costs between outpatient and inpatient surgery groups, with a literature review

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 630-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Mullins ◽  
Mirza Pojskić ◽  
Frederick A. Boop ◽  
Kenan I. Arnautović
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Outpatient Surgery ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Outcome Parameters ◽  
Outpatient Group ◽  
Significant Difference

OBJECTIVEOutpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is becoming more common and has been reported to offer advantages over inpatient procedures, including reducing nosocomial infections and costs, as well as improving patient satisfaction. The goal of this retrospective study was to evaluate and compare outcome parameters, complication rates, and costs between inpatient and outpatient ACDF cases performed by 1 surgeon at a single institution.METHODSIn a retrospective study, the records of all patients who had undergone first-time ACDF performed by a single surgeon in the period from June 1, 2003, to January 31, 2016, were reviewed. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: those who had undergone ACDF as outpatients in a same-day surgical center and those who had undergone surgery in the hospital with a minimum 1-night stay. Outcomes for all patients were evaluated with respect to the following parameters: age, sex, length of stay, preoperative and postoperative pain (self-reported questionnaires), number of levels fused, fusion, and complications, as well as the presence of risk factors, such as an increased body mass index, smoking, and diabetes mellitus.RESULTSIn total, 1123 patients were operated on, 485 (43%) men and 638 (57%) women, whose mean age was 50 years. The mean follow-up time was 25 months. Overall, 40.5% underwent 1-level surgery, 34.3% 2-level, 21.9% 3-level, and 3.2% 4-level. Only 5 patients had nonunion of vertebrae; thus, the fusion rate was 99.6%. Complications occurred in 40 patients (3.6%), with 9 having significant complications (0.8%). Five hundred sixty patients (49.9%) had same-day surgery, and 563 patients (50.1%) stayed overnight in the hospital. The inpatients were older, were more commonly male, and had a higher rate of diabetes. Smoking status did not influence the length of stay. Both groups had a statistically significant reduction in pain (expressed as a visual analog scale score) postoperatively with no significant difference between the groups. One- and 2-level surgeries were done significantly more often in the outpatient setting (p < 0.001).The complication rate was 4.1% in the outpatient group and 3.0% in the inpatient group; there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.339). Significantly more complications occurred with 3- and 4-level surgeries than with 1- and 2-level procedures (p < 0.001, chi-square test). The overall average inpatient cost for commercial insurance carriers was 26% higher than those for outpatient surgery.CONCLUSIONSAnterior cervical discectomy and fusion is safe for patients undergoing 1- or 2-level surgery, with a very significant rate of pain reduction and fusion and a low complication rate in both clinical settings. Outpatient and inpatient groups undergoing 3- or 4-level surgery had an increased risk of complications (compared with those undergoing 1- or 2-level surgery), with a negligible difference between the 2 groups. This finding suggests that these procedures can also be included as standard outpatient surgery. Comparable outcome parameters and the same complication rates between inpatient and outpatient groups support both operative environments.

Association Between Social Determinants of Health and Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Single-Level Lumbar Fusions

Spine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed I. Khalid ◽  
Samantha Maasarani ◽  
Ravi S. Nunna ◽  
Rachyl M. Shanker ◽  
Alecia A. Cherney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Determinants Of Health ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Determinants Of Health ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Single Level

scholarly journals 463. Factors of Social Determinants of Health Associated with Length of Stay in COVID-19 Patients with Multimorbidity in Southwest Georgia, United States

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S333-S334
Author(s):  
Sahand Golpayegany ◽  
Sharmon P Osae ◽  
Geren Thomas ◽  
Henry N Young ◽  
Andrés F Henao Martínez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Built Environment ◽  
Social Determinants Of Health ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Healthcare Access ◽  
Community Context ◽  
Determinants Of Health ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Economic Stability ◽  
Access And Quality

Abstract Background Previous studies have observed that multimorbidity, defined as two or more comorbidities, is associated with longer lengths of stay (LOS) and higher mortality in patients with COVID-19. In addition, inequality in social determinants of health (SDOH), dictated by economic stability, education access and quality, healthcare access and quality, neighborhoods and built environment, and social and community context have only added to disparities in morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19. However, the relationship between SDOH and LOS in COVID-19 patients with multimorbidity is poorly characterized. Analyzing the effect SDOH have on LOS can help identify patients at high risk for prolonged hospitalization and allow prioritization of treatment and supportive measures to promote safe and expeditious discharge. Methods This study was a multicenter, retrospective analysis of adult patients with multimorbidity who were hospitalized with COVID-19. The primary outcome was to determine the LOS in these patients. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the role that SDOH play in LOS. Poisson regression analyses were performed to examine associations between individual SDOH and LOS. Results A total of 370 patients were included with a median age of 65 years (IQR 55-74), of which 57% were female and 77% were African American. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 4 (IQR 2-6) with hypertension (77%) and diabetes (51%) being the most common, while in-hospital mortality was 23%. Overall, median length of stay was 7 days (IQR 4-13). White race (-0.16, 95% CI -0.27 to -0.05, p=0.003) and residence in a single-family home (-0.28, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.17, p&lt; 0.001) or nursing home/long term care facility (-0.36, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.21, p&lt; 0.001) were associated with decreased LOS, while Medicare (0.24, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.38, p=0.001) and part-time (0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.57, p=0.002) or full-time (0.25, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.38, p&lt; 0.001) employment were associated with increased LOS. Conclusion Based on our results, differences in SDOH, including economic stability, neighborhood and built environment, social and community context, as well as healthcare access and quality, have observable effects on COVID-19 patient LOS in the hospital. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document