Efficacy of anterior odontoid screw fixation in elderly patients with Type II odontoid fractures

2000 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
James S. Harrop ◽  
Gregory J. Przybylski ◽  
Alexander R. Vaccaro ◽  
Kennedy Yalamanchili

Object Type II odontoid fractures are the most common trauma-related dens fracture. Although Type III odontoid fractures have a high union rate when external immobilization is applied, Type II fractures are associated with high rates of nonunion, particularly in elderly patients and those with posteriorly displaced fractures or fractures displaced by more than 6 mm. Because elderly patients may not also tolerate external immobilization in a halo vest, alternative techniques should be explored to identify a method for managing these higher-risk patients. In this study the authors examine the efficacy of anterior odontoid screw fixation in a high-risk group of 10 elderly patients (> 65 years of age) treated for Type II odontoid fractures. Methods A retrospective review of all patients with Type II odontoid fractures treated at two institutions between September 1997 and March 2000 was performed. Demographic data, neurological examination, fracture type and degree of displacement, treatment method, and outcome data were examined at discharge. Ten patients older than 65 years who had sustained a trauma-related odontoid fracture and had undergone an anterior odontoid screw placement procedure were retrospectively reviewed. Fracture displacement (mean 6.6 mm) was observed in all but one patient, and in seven there were posteriorly displaced fractures. Seven were successfully treated with anterior screw fixation and external orthosis alone; in one patient in whom poor intraoperative screw purchase had been observed, the fracture healed after undergoing halo vest therapy. Only one patient was shown to develop a nonunion requiring a subsequent posterior fusion procedure. Conclusions Odontoid screw fixation can be safely performed in elderly patients, and frequent bone union is demonstrated. However, osteopenia may preclude adequate screw fixation in some patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 1858-1863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendrik Kohlhof ◽  
Ulrich Seidel ◽  
Sven Hoppe ◽  
Marius J. Keel ◽  
Lorin M. Benneker

2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 651-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Nourbakhsh ◽  
Runhua Shi ◽  
Prasad Vannemreddy ◽  
Anil Nanda

Object The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the criteria described in the literature as the indications for surgery for acute Type II odontoid fractures. Methods The authors searched the PubMed database for studies in which the fusion rate of acute Type II odontoid fractures following external immobilization (halo vest or collar) or surgery (posterior C1–2 fusion or anterior screw fixation) was reported. The only studies included reported the fusion rate for either 1) groups of patients whose age was either more or less than a certain age range (45–55 years); or 2) groups of patients with a fracture displacement of either more or less than a certain odontoid fracture displacement (4–6 mm) or the direction of displacement (see Methods section of text for more details). A meta-analysis in which the random effect model was used was conducted to analyze the data. Results There was a statistically significantly higher fusion rate for operative management compared with external immobilization (85 vs 60%, p = 0.01) for the patients > 45–55 years. However, the overall fusion rate was > 80% for the patients whose age was < 45–55 years, regardless of treatment modality, and no significant differences were observed between surgically and nonsurgically treated patients (89 and 81%, respectively; p = 0.29). The result of operation (overall fusion rate 89%) was superior to external immobilization (44%) when the fracture was posteriorly displaced (p < 0.001), but for anteriorly displaced fractures, the results of operative and nonoperative management were identical (p = 0.15). The overall fusion rate of operative management of both anteriorly and posteriorly displaced fractures proved to be > 85%, and no statistically significant difference was observed (p = 0.50). For all degrees of displacement (either > or < 4–6 mm) the operation proved to provide significantly better results than conservative treatment. The fusion rate of conservatively treated fractures with < 4–6 mm displacement was significantly better than in fractures with > 4–6 mm displacement (76 vs 41%, p = 0.002). Conclusions Operative treatment (posterior C1–2 fixation or anterior screw fixation) provides a better fusion rate than external immobilization for acute odontoid Type II fractures, although in certain situations, such as anterior displacement of the fracture and for younger (< 45–55 years of age) patients, conservative management (halo vest or collar immobilization) can be as effective as surgery. Operative management is recommended in older patients, in cases of posterior displacement of the fracture, and when there is displacement of > 4–6 mm.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Leitner ◽  
C. I. Brückmann ◽  
M. M. Gilg ◽  
G. Bratschitsch ◽  
P. Sadoghi ◽  
...  

Purpose. Anterior screw fixation has become a popular surgical treatment method for instable odontoid fractures. Screw loosening and migration are a rare, severe complication following anterior odontoid fixation, which can lead to esophagus perforation and requires revision operation. Methods. We report a case of screw loosening and migration after anterior odontoid fixation, which perforated the esophagus and was excreted without complications in a 78-year-old male patient. Results. A ventral dislocated anterior screw perforated through the esophagus after eight years after implantation and was excreted through the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. At a 6-month follow-up after the event the patient was asymptomatic. Conclusion. Extrusion via the GI tract is not safe enough to be considered as a treatment option for loosened screws. Some improvements could be implemented to prevent such an incident. Furthermore, this case is a fine example that recent preoperative imaging is mandatory before revision surgery for screw loosening.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Preci Hamilton ◽  
Peyton Lawrence ◽  
Christian Valentin Eisenring

Abstract Odontoid fractures constitute the commonest cervical spinal fracture in the elderly. There are varied management approaches with paucity of robust evidence to guide decision-making. We review the case of a 92-years-old man with traumatic Grauer type II B odontoid fracture treated with anterior cannulated screw fixation. Postoperatively, he was noted to have dysphagia due to a zenker’s diverticulum. Further history revealed repair of a zenker’s diverticulum ~40 years prior. Cervical spine images and video fluoroscopy demonstrated a recurrent zenker’s diverticulum. After re-excision of the recurrent zenker’s diverticulum his dysphagia resolved. This unique case describes dysphagia due to recurrent zenker’s diverticulum presenting after anterior cannulated screw fixation for type II B odontoid fracture. The dysphagia was diagnosed and treated in close collaboration with speech and language therapists and otorhinolaryngologist. This underscores the importance of holistic approach to the elderly patient with odontoid fractures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document