Comparative Evaluation of Intraoperative Cytology and Histopathology in Ovarian Neoplasms

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 467-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Shahid ◽  
Sufian Zaheer ◽  
Aysha Mubeen ◽  
Khaliqur Rahman ◽  
Rana K. Sherwani

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1630-1634
Author(s):  
Karishma Malla Vaidya ◽  
Bigya Shrestha ◽  
Runa Jha ◽  
Binit Shrestha ◽  
Aasiya Rajbhandari ◽  
...  

Background: Touch/ imprint cytology has been utilized for intraoperative evaluations of tumors to complement frozen sections in order to reach diagnosis prior to histopathology diagnosis. The main aim of this study is to find role of touch imprint in determining histopathology diagnosis of ovarian neoplasm. Materials and Methods: All together one hundred three cases were evaluated using both touch/imprint and histopathology diagnosis. The histopathology diagnoses consisted of Benign (n=85), borderline (n=4), and malignant (n=12). Touch imprint cytology consists of Negative for malignancy (n=90), Positive for malignancy (n=11) and inadequate (n=2). Inadequate smear was excluded from the study. Results: Both touch / imprint cytology were able to diagnose benign and malignant ovarian neoplasm. Out of 103 cases, in cytology showed 89.1% patients were negative and 10.9% patients were positive. Histopathology shows 84.2% of benign ovarian neoplasm, 3.9% borderline neoplasm and 11.9% of malignant. Diagnostic accuracy of touch/ imprint was 99% with sensitivity 100% and specificity was 91.67%. Positive predictive value was 98.89% and negative predictive value was 100%. Conclusion: Touch/ imprint cytology examination is simple, rapid and useful test in evaluation of ovarian neoplasms. It plays very important role in preliminary intraoperative diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangita Bohara ◽  
Shyama Jain ◽  
Nita Khurana ◽  
DarilinM Shangpliang ◽  
Swapnil Agarwal ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 362-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna M. Risberg ◽  
Robyn M. Cox

A custom in-the-ear (ITE) hearing aid fitting was compared to two over-the-ear (OTE) hearing aid fittings for each of 9 subjects with mild to moderately severe hearing losses. Speech intelligibility via the three instruments was compared using the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) test. The relationship between functional gain and coupler gain was compared for the ITE and the higher rated OTE instruments. The difference in input received at the microphone locations of the two types of hearing aids was measured for 10 different subjects and compared to the functional gain data. It was concluded that (a) for persons with mild to moderately severe hearing losses, appropriately adjusted custom ITE fittings typically yield speech intelligibility that is equal to the better OTE fitting identified in a comparative evaluation; and (b) gain prescriptions for ITE hearing aids should be adjusted to account for the high-frequency emphasis associated with in-the-concha microphone placement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document